Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ambivalence About Equality in the United States or, Did Tocqueville Get it Wrong and Why Does that Matter?

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alexis de Tocqueville believed that “democratic peoples’... passion for equality is ardent, insatiable, eternal, and invincible.” This article examines whether and under what conditions residents of the United States demonstrate such a commitment to equality. I show that at many points in history, Americans have indeed chosen to move toward greater justice and less oppression; however, there are clear limits to their passion for equality. White Americans endorse less social, political, and economic equality than do African Americans, but even the latter often resist equality for groups that they perceive to be threats, or for behaviors that threaten strong social or moral norms. The article discusses implications for political activists of these patterns of support for and resistance to greater equality, and suggests strategies for overcoming oppression and promoting justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, R., Abdel-Hady, D., Islam, T., and Marotz, K. (2004). Downward assimilation and Mexican Americans: An examination of intergenerational advance and stagnation in educational attainment. University at Albany, SUNY: Department of Sociology.

  • Associated Press (2003). Poll. February 28–March 4. 1

  • Banaszak, L. A. (1996). Why Movements Succeed or Fail: Opportunity, Culture, and the Struggle for Woman Suffrage, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J., Portney, K., and Thomson, K. (1993). The Rebirth of Urban Democracy, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2001). Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2000, Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2004). Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2002, Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles F. Kettering Foundation (1971). Attitudes Toward the Public Schools. Dayton Ohio: Kettering Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNN/U.S.A. Today (1994). Gallup, CNN, U.S.A. Today Poll. April 22–24.

  • CNN/U.S.A. Today (1999). Gallup, CNN, U.S.A. Today Poll. July 16–18.

  • Davis, J. (1997). The GSS—Capturing American attitude change. Public Perspectives 8(2): 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Smith, T., and Marsden, P. (2001). General Social Surveys, 1972–2000: Cumulative Codebook, National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M., and Popoff, R. (2004). Reparations: Justice and Greed in Black and White. Du Bois Rev. 1(1): 47–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1966 [1848]). Democracy in America, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam, S. (ed.). (1989). The Gallup/Phi Delta Kappa Polls of Attitudes Toward the Public Schools, 1969–1988, Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox News (2001). Fox News, Opinion Dynamics Poll. March 28–29.

  • Gallup Organization (1973). Gallup Poll—AIPO. Gallup Poll Monthly. August 3–6.

  • Gallup Organization (1975). Gallup Poll—AIPO. Gallup Poll Monthly. September 12–15.

  • Gallup Organization (1997). The Gallup Poll Social Audit on Black/White Relations in the United States, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Organization (2003). Blacks Lag Behind Whites in Life Satisfaction. www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr040119.asp.

  • Guinier, L., and Torres, G. (2002). The Miner’s Canary: Enlisting Race, Resisting Power, Transforming Democracy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D., and Hamilton, C. (1997). The Dual Agenda: Race and Social Welfare Policies of Civil Rights Organizations, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., and Associates (1970). Harris Survey. March, New York.

  • Harris, L., and Associates (1978). San Bernardino, California Community Survey. March, New York.

  • Hochschild, J. (1981). What’s Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, J. (1984). The New American Dilemma: Liberal Democracy and School Desegregation, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, J. (1995). Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, J. (1998). You win some, you lose some ...: Explaining the pattern of success and failure in the second reconstruction. In Keller, M., and Melnick, R. S. (eds.), Taking Stock: Policy and Governance in the Twentieth Century, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, J., and Herk, M. (1990). ‘Yes, but ... ’: Principles and caveats in American racial attitudes. In Chapman, J., and Wertheimer, A. (eds.), Nomos XXXII: Majorities and Minorities, New York University Press, New York, pp. 308–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, D. (1993). How wide the circle of the “we”? American intellectuals and the problem of the ethnos since World War II. Am. Historical Rev. 98(2): 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz, J., and Peffley, M. (2001). Racial Polarization on Criminal Justice Issues: Sources and Political Consequences of Fairness Judgements, American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennelle, B. (2001). Flying in the Face of Racism. Harvard Crimson, November 6.

  • Johnson, D. (2002). Justice or ‘Just Us?’ Perceived Racial Bias in the Criminal Justice System, Harvard University, Department of Sociology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., and Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 33(1): 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahlenberg, R. (2001). The fall and rise of school segregation. Am. Prospect. 12(9): 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manza, J., and Uggen, C. (2004). Punishment and democracy: Disfranchisement of nonincarcerated felons in the United States. Perspectives on Politics 2(3): 491–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. (1997). For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (1997). The Racial Contract, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1944). An American Dilemma, Harper and Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (1989). The Unfinished Agenda on Race in America, Vol. 1, New York.

  • National Conference for Community and Justice (2000). Taking America’s Pulse II: A Survey of Intergroup Relations, National Conference for Community and Justice, New York.

  • NBC News/Wall Street Journal (2002). Poll. July 19–21.

  • Newsweek (1997). Princeton Survey Research Associates, Newsweek Poll. June 19–20.

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, G., and Lee, C. (2004). Brown at 50: King’s Dream or Plessy’s Nightmare? Harvard University, Civil Rights Project, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. (1966). Democracy, Liberty and Property; The State Constitutional Conventions of the 1820’s, Bobbs-Merrill Co., Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, J. R. (1993). The Pursuit of Equality in American History, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (1988). Knowing Power. In Shapiro, I., and Reeher, G. (eds.), Power, Inequality, and Democratic Politics, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 17–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D., et al. (1981). Equalities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L., and Smeeding, T. (2003). Poor Kids in a Rich Country: America’s Children in Comparative Perspective, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaar, J. (1964). Some ways of thinking about equality. J. Politics 26(4): 867–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., et al. (1997). Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1997). Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2000). The significance of racial context. In Sears, D., Sidanius, J., and Bobo, L. (eds.), Racialized Politics: The Debate about Racism in America, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 118–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Time, C. N. N., and Harris Interactive (2003). Poll. February 19–20.

  • Warren, M. (2001). Dry Bones Rattling: Community Building to Revitalize American Democracy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortley, S., Hagan, J., and Macmillan, R. (1997). Just des(s)erts? The racial polarization of perceptions of criminal justice. Law Soc. Rev. 31(4): 637–676.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer L. Hochschild.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochschild, J.L. Ambivalence About Equality in the United States or, Did Tocqueville Get it Wrong and Why Does that Matter?. Soc Just Res 19, 43–62 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-9999-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-9999-2

Key Words

Navigation