Skip to main content
Log in

Why Missing Data Matter in the Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Development: Using the 4-H Study to Understand the Uses of Different Missing Data Methods

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of adolescent development rests on methodologically appropriate collection and interpretation of longitudinal data. While all longitudinal studies of adolescent development involve missing data, the methods to treat missingness that have been recommended most often focus on missing data from cross-sectional studies. The problems of missing data in longitudinal studies are not described well, there are not many statistical software programs developed for researchers to use, and there are no longitudinal empirical examples involving adolescent development that show the extent to which different missing data procedures can yield different results. Data from the first three waves of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development were used to provide such an illustration. The sample contains 2,265 participants (56.7% females) who were in Grade 5 at Wave 1, in Grade 6 at Wave 2, and in Grade 7 at Wave 3, and varied in race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, family structure, rural–urban location, and geographic region. The results showed that three missing data techniques, i.e., listwise deletion, direct maximum likelihood (DirML), and multiple imputation (MI), did not yield comparable results for research questions assessing different aspects of development (i.e., change over time or prediction effects). The results indicated also that listwise deletion should not be used. Instead, both DirML and MI methods should be used to determine if and how results change when these procedures are employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation procedure in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advance structural equation modeling (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armsden, G., & Greenberger, M. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Nesselrode, J. R. (1988). Introduction to research methods: Life-span developmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multivariate regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. W., & Kam, C. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, M. J., & Hogan, J. W. (2000). Reparameteirizing the pattern mixture model for sensitivity analysis under informative dropout. Biometrics, 56, 1241–1248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. M., Fang, G. Y., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2004). Alternative methods for handling attrition in prevention research: An illustration using data from Fast Track. Evaluation Review, 28, 434–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 87–114). Vol. 2 of Handbook of psychology (I. B. Weiner, Editor-in-Chief). New York: Wiley.

  • Graham, J. W., & Donaldson, S. I. (1993). Evaluating interventions with differential attrition: The importance of nonresponse mechanisms and use of follow-up data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 119–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., & Hofer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1996). Maximizing the usefulness of data obtained with planned missing value patterns: An application of maximum likelihood procedures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. R., & Steinberg, L. (1999). Unpacking authoritative parenting: Reassessing a multidimensional construct. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 574–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, O., & Zhou, X. H. (2007). Multiple imputation: Review of theory, implementation and software. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 3057–3077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1983). Supplementary description of the self-perception profile for children: Revision of the perceived competence scale for children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver.

  • Jelicic, H., Phelps, E., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). Use of missing data methods in longitudinal studies: The persistence of bad practices in developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1195–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. P. (1996). Indicator and stratification methods for missing explanatory variables in multiple linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(433), 222–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., & Steinberg, L. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs, G., Kenward, M. G., & Lesaffre, E. (1997). The analysis of longitudinal ordinal data with non-random dropout. Biometrika, 84, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 525–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E., Balsano, A. B., Fay, K., Peltz, J. S., Zimmerman, S., Lerner, R. M., et al. (2007). Nuances in early adolescent developmental trajectories of positive and problematic/risk behaviors: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16(2), 473–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E., Zimmerman, S., Warren, A. E. A., Jelicic, H., von Eye, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of Positive Youth Development (PYD) in early adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. L., Switzer, F. S., & Switzer, D. M. (1999). Missing data in multiple item scales: Monte Carlo analysis of missing data techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3), 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(4), 545–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schludermann, E., & Schluderman, S. (1970). Replicability of factors in children’s reports of parent behavior (CRPBI). Journal of Psychology, 76, 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinharay, S., Stern, H. S., & Russell, D. (2001). The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 317–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Small, S. A., & Kerns, D. (1993). Unwanted sexual activity among peers during early and middle adolescence: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A. (Ed.). (1990a). Statistical methods in longitudinal research. Vol. 1. Principles and structuring change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A. (Ed.). (1990b). Statistical methods in longitudinal research. Vol. 2. Time series and categorical longitudinal data. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a grant to Richard M. Lerner by the National 4-H Council. The authors thank Aline Sayer and Avron Spiro for their valuable comments. This article is based in part on a dissertation submitted by the first author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Child Development at Tufts University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Jeličić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeličić, H., Phelps, E. & Lerner, R.M. Why Missing Data Matter in the Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Development: Using the 4-H Study to Understand the Uses of Different Missing Data Methods. J Youth Adolescence 39, 816–835 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9542-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9542-5

Keywords

Navigation