Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pilot Study on Equivalence Between the Electronic and Paper Version of the Chinese SF-36

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aim to verify the equivalence between the paper and electronic version of Chinese SF-36 administered using the Quality-of-Life-Recorder. A crossover trial of the electronic and paper versions of the Chinese SF-36 was performed as follows: the interviewees were asked to fill out either an electronic version or a paper version firstly according to their own willingness. After at least 30 min interval, interviewees were required to complete the other version. This study used a convenience sample of medical college freshman participating in courses at the College of Medicine of Zhejiang University (China). About 100 subjects were eventually recruited and the response rate was 90.9%. The mean difference of completion time between the two versions was caused by an impact of order sequence and advantages of the electronic version over the paper version were eventually verified. At both the level of eight subscales and the level of 36 items, score equivalence was achieved between two versions. Thereby this study provided an empirical basis for the identification of the equivalence between the paper version and electronic version of the Chinese SF-36 and can be regarded as a pilot towards further investigations on how to facilitate widespread deployment of the Quality-of-Life-Recorder in Asian populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson, N. K., Acquadro, C., Alonso, J., et al. (1992). International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Quality of Life Research, 1, 349–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammentorp, J., Rasmussen, A. M., Nørgaard, B., et al. (2007). Electronic questionnaires for measuring parent satisfaction and as a basis for quality improvement. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 120–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, J. J., Caro, I., Caro, J., et al. (2001). Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation? Quality of Life Research, 10, 683–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, P. R., Stewart, M. J., Stille, F. C., et al. (1995). Electronic quality of life questionnaires: A comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Quality of Life Research, 4, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandek, B., & Ware, J. E. (1998). Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: The IQOLA project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 953–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holch, S. (2000). Practical aspects of standard measurement of quality-of-life for in-patient with an electronic quality-of-life-Recorder. Dissertation of doctoral degree of medicine of the University of ULM (in German).

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Wang, H. M., & Shen, Y. (2003). Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 259–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, M. E., & Mandel, A. R. (1994). A client-computer interface for questionnaire data. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 639–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Lu, J. F. R., et al. (1994). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32, 40–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, S. J. (1983). Crossover trial. In S. J. Pocock (Ed.), Clinical trials: A practical approach (pp. 100–123). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouwer, F., Snoek, F. J., van der Ploeg, H. M., et al. (1998). A comparison of the standard and the computerized version of the well-being questionnaire (WBQ) and the diabetics treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ). Quality of Life Research, 7, 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. M., Corry, J. R., Attewell, R., et al. (2002). A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 general health questionnaire to the standard paper version. Quality of Life Research, 11, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigle, J. (1993–1995). Quality of life: Computer assistant measurement of quality of life. In E. D. V Kunstvolle & Elektronik (Eds.), QL-Recorder Software Manual (in German).

  • Sigle, J. M. (1995). Practical aspects of quality-of-life measure: Standard measurement of quality-of-life for out-patients with an electronic quality-of-life-Recorder. Dissertation of doctoral degree of medicine of the University of ULM (in German).

  • Sigle, J., & Porzsolt, F. (1996). Practical aspects of quality-of-life measurement: Design and feasibility study of the quality-of-life recorder and the standardized measurement of quality of life in an out-patient clinic. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 22(suppl. A), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velikova, G., Wright, E. P., Cull, S. A., et al. (1999). Automated collection of quality-of-life data: A comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 998–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) 1: Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. S., Kitas, G. D., Carruthers, D. M., et al. (2002). Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: An initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. Rheumatology, 41, 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the project (grant # WKJ2006-2-016) entitled “Effect of chronic diseases and health-related quality of life on health service utilization” from the Ministry of Health, China. We strongly appreciated great help from three anonymous reviewers due to their critical comments and constructive suggestions. We are indebted to Dr. Joerg Sigle for his great help for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Social and Family Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, China

    Tianhui Chen & Lu Li

Authors
  1. Tianhui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tianhui Chen or Lu Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, T., Li, L. Pilot Study on Equivalence Between the Electronic and Paper Version of the Chinese SF-36. J Happiness Stud 11, 151–161 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9128-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9128-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation