Abstract
Effectiveness of functional analysis (FA) and functional communication training (FCT) on challenging behavior was assessed in three children with Angelman syndrome (AS). Analogue FA conditions were used to assess the behavioral function of the challenging behavior. FA and FCT protocols were administered in the children’s classroom and were performed by their teachers. Replacement behavior was prompted upon the onset of precursor behavior. One or more function(s) of their challenging behavior were identified and challenging behavior appeared to be escape or tangibly motivated. Making physical contact with the teacher was found to be a precursor of challenging behavior in one child. In all children, challenging behavior decreased as a function of FCT. Functional equivalence of both challenging and replacement behavior was evinced. Clinical and research implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, D., Oliver, C., Webster, P., Reid, D., Villa, D., Beaumont, S., et al. (2010). Behavioral intervention for challenging behavior in children with Angelman syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 885.
Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (2001). The picture exchange communication system. Behavior Modification, 25, 725–744.
Borrero, C. S. W., & Borrero, J. C. (2008). Descriptive and experimental analyses of potential precursors to problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 83–96.
Carr, E. G., & Durand, M. V. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
De Bildt, A. A., & Kraijer, D. W. (2003). Vineland-Z: Sociale zelfredzaamheidschaal voor kinderen en jeugdigen met een verstandelijke beperking. [Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales, Survey Form]. Leiden: PITS.
Derby, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W., DeRaad, A., Ulrich, S., Asmus, J., et al. (1997). The long-term effects of functional communication training in home settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 507–531.
Derby, M., Hagopian, L., Fisher, W. W., Richman, D., Augustine, M., Fahs, A., & Thompson, R. (2000). Functional analysis of aberrant behavior through measurement of separate response topographies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 113–117.
Didden, R., Sigafoos, J., Korzilius, H., Baas, A., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., & Curfs, L. M. G. (2009). Form and function of communicative behaviors in individuals with Angelman syndrome. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 22, 526–537.
Hagopian, L., Rooker, G., DeLeon, I., & Jessel J. (2012). Clarification of undifferentiated functional analysis outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. (in press).
Iwata, B., Dorsey, M., Slifer, K., Bauman, K., & Richman, G. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1982, 2, 3–20.
Lalande, M., & Calciano, M. A. (2007). Molecular epigenetics of Angelman syndrome. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 65, 947–960.
Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., & Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: an overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 468–488.
Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Machalicek, W., Lancioni, G., Rispoli, M., & Chan, J. M. A. (2008). Preliminary comparison of functional analysis results when conducted in contrived versus natural settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 441–445.
Lang, R., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., Didden, R., & Rispoli, M. J. (2010). Influence of assessment setting on the results of functional analyses of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 565–568.
Langdon, N. A., Carr, E. G., & Owen-DeSchryver, J. S. (2008). Functional analysis of precursors for serious problem behavior and related intervention. Behavior Modification, 32, 804–827.
Leyser, Y., & Kirk, R. (2011). Parent’s perspectives on inclusion and schooling of students with Angelman syndrome: suggestions for educators. International Journal of Special Education, 26, 1–14.
Lydon, S., Healy, O., O’Reilly, M. F., & Lang, R. (2012). Variations in functional analysis methodology: a systematic review. Journal of Physical and Developmental Disability, 24, 301–326.
Martin, N., Oliver, C., & Hall, S. (2001). Obswin: Software for the collection and analysis of observational data. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Oliver, C., Hall, S., & Murphy, G. (2005). The early development of self-injurious behavior: evaluating the role of social reinforcement. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 591–599.
Radstaake, M., Didden, R., Oliver, C., Allen, D., & Curfs, L. M. G. (2012). Functional analysis and functional communication training in individuals with Angelman syndrome. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15, 91–104.
Reeve, C. E., & Carr, E. G. (2000). Prevention of severe problem behavior in children with developmental disorders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 144–160.
Ringdahl, J. E., & Sellers, J. A. (2000). The effects of different adults as teachers during functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 247–250.
Rispoli, M. J., Franco, J. H., Van der Meer, L., Lang, R., & Camargo, S. P. H. (2010). The use of speech generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 276–293.
Sigafoos, J., & Meikle, B. (1996). Functional communication training for the treatment of multiply determined challenging behavior in two boys with autism. Behavior Modification, 20, 60–84.
Stokes, T., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior of Analysis, 10, 349–367.
Strachan, R., Shaw, R., Burrow, C., Horsler, K., Allen, D., & Oliver, C. (2009). Experimental functional analysis of aggression in children with Angelman Syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1095–1106.
Summers, J. (2012). Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with Angelman syndrome after 1 year of behavioral intervention. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. doi:10.3109/17518423.2012.676101.
Tait, K., Sigafoos, J., Woodyatt, G., O’Reily, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2004). Evaluating parent use of functional communication training to replace and enhance prelinguistic behaviours in six children with developmental and physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1241–1254.
Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: a review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 16–23.
Van der Meulen, B. F., Ruiter, S. A. J., Lutje Spelberg, H. C., & Smrkovsky, M. (2002). Bayley Scales of Infant Development—Second Edition—Dutch Version (BSID-II-NL). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Williams, C. A. (2010). The behavioral phenotype of the Angelman Syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 154C, 432–437.
Wood, B. K., Cho-Blair, K., & Ferro, J. B. (2009). Young children with challenging behavior function-based assessment and intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2, 68–78.
Acknowledgments
Gratitude goes out to all the children, parents and teachers who enabled us to perform this research in the natural environments of the children. The authors would like to thank the Angelman Foundation for funding this research.
Declaration of Interest
This research was funded by a grant from the Angelman Foundation. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radstaake, M., Didden, R., Lang, R. et al. Functional Analysis and Functional Communication Training in the Classroom for Three Children with Angelman Syndrome. J Dev Phys Disabil 25, 49–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9302-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9302-4