Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Score Dependability of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales Using Generalizability Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the reliability of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales, this study applied generalizability analysis with two college student samples who completed the scales at two time points. The results indicated that the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale had acceptable levels of score dependability, but that the score dependability for the other scales (the Physical Anhedonia Scale, the Perceptual Aberration Scale, and the Magical Ideation Scale) was below an acceptable level of .80. The patterns of variance components suggested that the scales’ items need improvement. Researchers can use the included tables to choose the number of items and occasions needed to get dependable score interpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. P., & Chapman, L. J. (1983). Reliability and the discrimination of normal and pathological groups. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 171, 658–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1976). Scales for physical and social anhedonia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 374–382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1978). Body-image aberration in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 399–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Miller, E. N. (1982). Reliabilities and intercorrelations of eight measures of proneness to psychosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 187–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., Kwapil, T. R., Eckblad, M., & Zinser, M. C. (1994). Putatively psychosis-prone subjects 10 years later. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 171–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. P., Chapman, L. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (1995). Scales for the measurement of schizotypy. In A. Raine, T. Lencz, & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Schizotypal personality (pp. 79–106). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski, P. M., Fernandes, L. O. L., Yee, C. M., & Miller, G. A. (1995). Ethnicity and gender in scales of psychosis proneness and mood disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 464–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, G. E., & Brennan, R. L. (1983). GENOVA [Computer software]. Iowa City: The University of Iowa, Iowa Testing Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckblad, M. L., & Chapman, L. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckblad, M. L., Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Mishlove, M. (1982). The revised social anhedonia scale. Unpublished test, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

  • Edell, W. S. (1995). The Wisconsin Psychosis-Proneness Scales. In G. A. Miller (Ed.), The behavioral high-risk paradigm in psychopathology. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, W. T., & Melby, J. N. (1999). Dependability of measurement in counseling psychology: an introduction to generalizability theory. Counseling Psychologist, 27, 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1970). A sequential system for personality scale development. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 61–96). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwapil, T. R. (1998). Social anhedonia as a predictor of the development of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 558–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwapil, T. R., Barrantes-Vidal, N., & Silvia, P. J. (2008). The dimensional structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales: factor identification and construct validity. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 444–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGlashan, T. H., Miller, T. J., Woods, S. W., Rosen, J. L., Hoffman, R. E., & Davidson, L. (2001). Structured interview for prodromal syndromes. New Haven: Yale School of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1964). Manual for use with checklist of schizotypic signs. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Meehl, P. E. (1989). Schizotaxia revisited. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 935–944.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mishlove, M., & Chapman, L. J. (1985). Social anhedonia in the prediction of psychosis proneness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 384–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, W. R. (2006). A psychometric study of the MPSI suicidal thoughts subscale. Stress, Trauma and Crisis: An International Journal, 9, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeger Halvorsen, M., Hagtvet, K. A., & Monsen, J. T. (2006). The reliability of self-image change scores in psychotherapy research: an application of generalizability theory. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 308–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated with faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beate P. Winterstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winterstein, B.P., Willse, J.T., Kwapil, T.R. et al. Assessment of Score Dependability of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales Using Generalizability Analysis. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 32, 575–585 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9181-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9181-x

Keywords

Navigation