Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining Parents’ Preferences for Group Parent Training for ADHD When Individual Parent Training is Unavailable

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parent training programs are considered well-established interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children as they reduce behavioral impairment, but limited parent engagement decreases service effectiveness. We used a discrete choice experiment to examine how parent preferences for group vs. individual format might influence their participation in Parent training. Parents (N = 260) seeking mental health services for children with elevated symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Ontario, Canada were participants. They preferred Individual parent training in another study and completed a discrete choice experiment composed of 30 choice tasks measuring Parent training format preference. In this paper, parents’ preferences for alternatives to Individual Parent training, specifically Group Parent training and Minimal Information options, were estimated. Specifically, this study asked “if first choice is unavailable, what is the second choice?” This question is important as many clinics may not be able to offer both group and individual therapy given state funding cuts for youth mental health services. Simulations predicted that 85.8 % of parents who initially preferred Individual Parent training would switch to Group Parent training that included step-by-step solutions to children’s emotional and behavior problems, and the possibility of feeling informed and confident. The remaining 14.2 % of parents preferred Minimal Information; these parents preferred internet services offered conveniently and timely. Findings highlight consideration of less appealing factors that families might trade for more desirable service elements in a cost-restrictive environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. Washington, DC: Author.

  • Armbruster, P., & Kazdin, A. E. (1994). Attrition in child psychotherapy. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, 16, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M., Cunningham, C., Georgiades, K., Cullen, J., Racine, Y., & Pettingill, P. (2009). The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI):2. Usefulness in screening for child and adolescent psychopathology. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 424–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brightman, R. P., Baker, B. L., Clark, D. B., & Ambrose, S. A. (1982). Effectiveness of alternative parent training formats. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 12, 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, E., Rahnev, D., & Banaji, M. (2009). Using conjoint analysis to detect discrimination: Revealing covert preferences from overt choices. Social Cognition, 27(1), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacko, A., et al. (2009). Enhancing traditional behavioral parent training for single mothers of children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38(2), 206–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, O., Momcilovic, N., Rossiter, R., Stumbles, E., & Taylor, E. (2001). A randomized trial of brief individual versus group parent training for behavior problems in children with severe learning disabilities. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P., Vinogradov, S., & Yalom, I. (2008). Group therapy. In R. E. Hales, S. Yadofsky, G. Gabbard (Eds.), The american psychiatric publishing textbook of psychiatry. 5th edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. E., Boyle, M. H., Hong, S., Pettingill, P., & Bohaychuk, D. (2009). The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 1. Rationale, development, and description of a computerized children's mental health intake and outcome assessment tool. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(4), 416–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., Bremmer, R., & Boyle, M. (1995). Large group community-based parent training programs for families of preschoolers at risk for disruptive behavior disorders: utilization, cost-effectiveness, and outcome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 1141–1159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C.E., Chen, Y., Deal, K., Rimas, H., McGrath, P., Reid, G., Lipman, E., & Corkum, P. (2013). The interim services preferences of parents waiting for children’s mental health treatment: A discrete-choice conjoint experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(6), 865–877. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9728-x.

  • Cunningham, C. E., Deal, K., Rimas, H., Gold, M., Sdao-Jarvie, K., & Boyle, M. (2008). Modeling the information transfer preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1123–1138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., Deal, K., & Chen, Y. (2010). Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. A new patient-centered approach to the assessment of health service preferences. The Patient, 3(4), 257–273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. E., Deal, K., Rimas, H., Chen, Y., Buchanan, D., & Sdao-Jarvie, K. (2009). Providing information to parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice analysis of professional preferences. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9338-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. E., Rimas, H., Chen, Y., Deal, K., McGrath, P., Lingley-Pottie, P., & Corkum, P. (2015). Modeling parenting programs as an interim service for families waiting for children’s mental health treatment. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(4) 616–629.

  • Dwight-Johnson, M., et al. (2001). Can quality improvement programs for depression in primary care address patient preferences for treatment? Medical Care, 39(9), 934–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. doi:10.1146=annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, R. B., Schulte, M. A., & Ricks, C. C. (1983). Individual versus group training for foster parents: Efficiency/effectiveness evaluations. Family Relations, 32, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honberg, R., Diehl, S., Kimball, A., Cruttadaro, D., & Fizpatrick, M. (2011). State mental health cuts: A national crisis. National Alliance on Mental Illness. Retrieved from http://www.nami.org.

  • Huber, J., Orme, B., & Miller, R. (2007). Dealing with product similarity in conjoint simulators. In A. Gustafsson, A. Hermann, F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications. 4th ed (pp. 347–352). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka, S. H., Zhang, L., & Wells, K. B. (2002). Unmet need for mental health care among U.S. children: variation by ethnicity and insurance status. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1548–1555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision-making: a users’ guide. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(8), 661–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall, A., Fristad, M., & Early, T. (2009). Factors influencing service utilization and mood symptom severity in children with mood disorders: effects of Multifamily Psychoeducation Groups (MFPGs). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 463–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalopoulos, K., Sanders, M., Turner, K., Murphy-Brennan, M., & Carter, R. (2007). Does the triple P-positive parenting program provide value for money? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 239–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & Prinz, R. (1990). Enhancement of social learning family interventions for childhood conduct disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 291–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & Prinz, R. (2003). Engagement of families for treatment of conduct problems. Behaviour Therapy, 34, 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey-Kane, E., & Prinz, R. J. (1999). Engagement in child and adolescent treatment: The role of parental cognitions and attributions. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 183–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orme, B. K. (2013). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. 3rd edn. Madison, WI: Research Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M., & Chrzan, K. (2004). Partial profile discrete choice: What’s the optimal number of attributes? (pp. 173–185). 2003 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, TX.

  • Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G. A., Gnagy, E. M., Greiner, A. R., & Hoza, B. (2005). The role of summer treatment programs in the context of comprehensive treatment for ADHD. In E. Hibbs, P. Jensen (Eds.), Psychosocial Treatments for Child and Adoelscent Disorders: Emprirically Based Strategies for Clinical Practice (pp. 377–410). Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevsner, R. (1982). Group parent training versus individual family therapy: an outcome study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13, 119–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. A., Johnson, F. R., & Maddala, T. (2002). Measuring what people value: a comparison of “attitude” and “preference” surveys. Health Services Research, 37, 1659–1679.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, W., Ogrodniczuk, J., Joyce, A., & Weideman, R. (2011). Short-term group therapies for complicated grief: Two research-based models. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Power, T., et al. (2009). An analysis of teacher investment in the context-of a family-school intervention for children with ADHD. School Mental Health, 1(3), 107–117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, D. (2006). Cognition: Exploring the science of the mind. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2003). Using discrete choice experiments to value health care: current practice and future prospects. Applied Health Economics and Policy Analysis, 2, 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M., Markie-Dadds, C., Tully, L., & Bor, W. (2000). The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 624–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, B. K., Evans, S. W., & Serpell, Z. N. (2009). Preventing failure among middle school students with ADHD: a survival analysis. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1993). Identifying program preferences through conjoint experiments: Illustrative results from a parent sample. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8(2), 124–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., & Hersen, M. (2011). Understanding research in clinical and counseling psychology. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waschbusch, D. A., Cunningham, C. E., Pelham, W. E., Rimas, H. L., Greiner, A. R., Gnagy, E. M., Waxmonsky, J., Fabiano, G., Robb, J., Burrows-MacLean, L., Scime, M., & Hoffman (2011). A discrete choice conjoint experiment to evaluate parent preferences for treatment of young, medication naïve children with with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(4), 546–561.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Stratton, C. (1984). Randomized trial of two parent training programs for families with conduct disordered children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 666–678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wymbs, F., Cunningham, C., Chen, Y., Rimas, H., Deal, K., Waschbusch, D., & Pelham, W. (2016). Examining parents’ preferences for group versus individual parent training programs versus a minimal information alternative for children with ADHD symptoms using a discrete choice conjoint experiment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45(5), 614–631.

Download references

Funding

This research was partially supported by a dissertation award from Children and Adults with ADHD (CHADD) awarded to the first author. It was also funded by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH62946) awarded to Dr. Pelham. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. This research involves human subjects and was approved by the Institutional Review Board. All participants provided informed consent before participating in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frances A. Wymbs.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wymbs, F.A., Chen, Y., Rimas, H.M. et al. Examining Parents’ Preferences for Group Parent Training for ADHD When Individual Parent Training is Unavailable. J Child Fam Stud 26, 888–904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0588-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0588-1

Keywords

Navigation