Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the spread of methamphetamine problems within California, 1980 to 2006

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction and spread of high potency methamphetamine has led to dramatic increases in drug-related problems in California. Prior research suggests that drug abuse rates are related to local demographic and economic characteristics, law enforcement activities, and sentencing practices. Methamphetamine abuse in particular has been shown to be reduced by laws regulating the raw materials needed for its production. This research models the regional effects of such laws on the spatio-temporal patterns of growth of methamphetamine-related problems across California from 1980 to 2006. Amphetamine-related arrests and hospital discharges related to amphetamine abuse/dependence were assembled for California counties over the years 1980–2006. Varying-parameter Bayesian space–time models were used to relate the implementation of major laws controlling the distribution of methamphetamine precursors to observed patterns of arrests and discharges and to allow such associations to vary by location. The models used conditionally autoregressive (CAR) Bayesian spatial priors to allow spatial correlation in estimation of county-specific growth in these measures over three distinct time periods: before the 1989 law, between the 1989 and 1997 laws, and after the 1997 law. Growth of arrests and discharges were related to demographic and economic indicators to determine geographic areas more or less susceptible to the spread of methamphetamine problems. Although both problem measures increased during all three periods, each of the precursor laws was associated with short-term reductions in the growth of arrests and discharges. Growth was greatest in central California counties prior to 1989 and increased in coastal counties in later years. From 1980 to 1989 growth was highest for counties with low incomes and high proportions of white residents, while 1989–1997 growth was highest in counties with fewer whites and more Hispanics. Growth after 1997 was not significantly associated with county characteristics. This research demonstrates that the precursor laws did suppress the growth of methamphetamine related arrests and hospital discharges. It also demonstrates specific geographic patterns in the growth of methamphetamine arrests and abuse across California during this time. Early patterns of growth were related to economic and demographic characteristics, while later patterns were not. This suggests that some counties were uniquely susceptible to the early spread of the methamphetamine epidemic, although problems eventually grew dramatically in all California counties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abellera, J., Annest, J. L., Conn, J. M., & Kohn, M (2005) How states are collecting and using cause of injury data: 2004 update to the 1997 report. National Center for Injury Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Available at http://www.cste.org/pdffiles/newpdffiles/ECodeFinal3705.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2011.

  • Anglin, M. D., Burke, C., Perrochet, B., Stamper, E., & Dawud-Noursi, S. (2000). History of the methamphetamine problem. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 32(2), 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., LaScala, E. A., Gruenewald, P. J., Freisthler, B., Treno, A., & Remer, L. (2009). Social disorganization, alcohol and other drug markets, and violence: A space-time model of community structure. In Y. F. Thomas, D. Richardson, & I. Cheung (Eds.), Geography of drug addiction (pp. 117–130). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardinelli, L., Clayton, D., Pascutto, C., Montomoli, C., Ghislandi, M., & Songini, M. (1995). Bayesian analysis of space-time variation in disease risk. Statistics in Medicine, 14(21–22), 2433–2443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2008). Regional Economic Accounts, Series CA1-3: Personal income, population, per capita personal income. U.S. Department of Commerce. Available online at http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/. Accessed on November 21, 2008.

  • Caulkins, J. (2000). Measurement and analysis of drug problems and drug control efforts. In D. Duffey (Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 391–449). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulkins, J., & Pacula, R. L. (2006). Marijuana markets: Inferences from reports by the household population. Journal of Drug Issues, 36(1), 173–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. K., & Liu, L.-M. (2003). Impacts of federal ephedrine and pseudoephedrine regulations on methamphetamine-related hospital admissions. Addiction, 98(9), 1229–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. K., & Liu, L.-M. (2005). Impacts of federal precursor chemical regulations on methamphetamine arrests. Addiction, 100(4), 479–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., & Gersh, J. H. (2000). Drug trafficking as a cottage industry. In M. Natarajan & M. Hough (Eds.), Illegal drug markets: From research to prevention policy (pp. 241–272). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, P. J. (1998). Drugs, violence, and federal funding: A research odyssey. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(9), 1915–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. D., & Backenheimer, M. (1998). Editor’s introduction: Insights into the drug-crime nexus. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(9), 1763–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICD-9-CM. (1991). In C. D. Puckett (Ed.). The educational annotation of ICD-9-CM (4th ed.). Reno, Nevada: Channel Publishing.

  • Iritani, B. J., Halfors, D. D., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Crystal methamphetamine use among young adults in the USA. Addiction, 102(7), 1102–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, C., Reber, E., Saxe, L., et al. (1998). The substance use system: social and neighborhood environments associated with substance use and misuse. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(8), 1681–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. B., Browne, W. J., & Vidal Rodeiro, C. L. (2003). Disease mapping with WinBUGS and MLwiN. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10, 325–337. WinBUGS version 1.4.3. Available at http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs/welcome.shtml.

  • Meux, E. F. (1993). How many diagnoses and procedures? Discharge Data Review, 20(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meux, E. F., Stith, S. A., & Zach, A. (1990). Report of results from the OSHPS reabstracting project: An evaluation of the reliability of selected patient discharge data July Through December 1988. Patient Discharge Data Section Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, Sacramento, CA. December 1990. 35 pages plus appendices A–I.

  • Miller, M. A. (1997). History and epidemiology of amphetamine abuse in the United States. In H. Klee (Ed.), Amphetamine misuse: International perspectives on current trends: Reading. UK: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P., & Beck, J. E. (1997). The legacy and the paradox: hidden contexts of methamphetamine use in the United States. In H. Klee (Ed.), Amphetamine misuse: International perspectives on current trends: Reading. UK: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Drug Intelligence Center. (2008). National methamphetamine threat assessment, 2009. U.S. Department of Justice. Available at http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs32/32166/32166p.pdf. Accessed on July 30, 2009.

  • National Drug Intelligence Center. (2009). Situation report: Pseudoephedrine Smurfing Fuels Surge in Large-Scale Methamphetamine Production in California. U.S. Department of Justice. Available at http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs36/36407/36407p.pdf. Accessed on August 11, 2009.

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1998). NIDA community drug alert bulletinMethamphetamine. October, 1998. Bethesda, MD: NIDA. Available at http://www.drugabuse.gov/MethAlert/MethAlert.html. Accessed August 5, 2009.

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2002). Methamphetamine abuse and addiction. NIDA research report series. NIH Publication Number 06-4210. Bethesda, MD: NIDA. Available at http://www.nida.nih.gov/researchreports/methamph/methamph.html. Accessed April 7, 2008.

  • Pennell, S., Ellett, J., Rienick, C., & Grimes J. (1999). Meth matters: Report on methamphetamine users in five Western Cities. U.S. Department of Justice Publication NCJ 176331. Available at http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/176331.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2009.

  • Rawson, R. A., Marinelli-Casey, P., Anglin, M. D., Dickow, A., Frazier, Y., Gallagher, C., et al. (2004). A multi-site comparison of psychosocial approaches for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Addiction, 99(6), 708–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian deviance, the effective number of parameters and the comparison of arbitrarily complex models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64(4), 583–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, 2004). Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), 1992–2002. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/teds02/2002_teds_rpt.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2009.

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, 2004b). Amphetamine and methamphetamine emergency department visits 1995–2002. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k4amphetamines.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2009.

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, 2006). State estimates of past year methamphetamine use. The NSDUH Report, Issue 37. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k6/statemeth/stateMeth.htm. Accessed August 4, 2009.

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, 2008). Treatment episode data set (TEDS), 1996–2006. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/teds06/teds2k6aweb508.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2009.

  • Suo, S. (2004). Unnecessary epidemic. The Oregonian, October 3, 2004. Available at http://www.house.gov/larsen/meth/press_20041003_oregonian_unnecessaryepidemic.shtml. Accessed November 12, 2009.

  • Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yacoubian, G. S. (2007). Assessing environmental prevention strategies for reducing the prevalence of associated harms of methamphetamine use. Journal of Drug Education, 37(1), 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research for and preparation of this manuscript was supported by NIDA Grant R21 DA024341 and NIAAA Center Grant P60 AA 006282 to Dr. Gruenewald, and by NIAAA grant R21 AA016632 to Dr. Waller.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William R. Ponicki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ponicki, W.R., Waller, L.A., Remer, L.R. et al. Exploring the spread of methamphetamine problems within California, 1980 to 2006. GeoJournal 78, 451–462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9428-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9428-4

Keywords

Navigation