Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Perceptions of the Business Case for Supplier Diversity: How Socially Responsible Purchasing can ‘Pay’

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In exploring corporate perceptions of the business case for supplier diversity (SD), this paper reports on a cross-national study of large purchasing organisations (LPOs) that had introduced, or were in the process of introducing, purchasing initiatives aimed at ethnic minority businesses (EMBs). The research investigates how LPOs portray the benefits of this form of socially responsible purchasing and suggests a business case construct based on four component elements. It also highlights a number of contextual factors that appear to have shaped business case rationales. The paper concludes with a discussion of issues of cost and contingent influences affecting SD programmes and points to possible areas for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abowd, J., Milkovich, G., & Hannon, J. (1990). The effects of human resource management decisions on shareholder value. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 43, 203–236. doi:10.2307/2523580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzone, G., & Bertele, U. (1994). Exploiting Green Strategies for Competitive Advantage. Long Range Planning, 27(6), 69–81. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(94)90165-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K·B., Stone, B.A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business & Society, 41(3), 292–318. doi:10.1177/0007650302041003003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. doi:10.2307/1556363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10, 7–45. doi:10.1162/105864001300122548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M.C., & Rodrigues, L.L. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., & Logsdon, J.M. (1996). How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(96)00041-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Community Connections. 2000, Connecting SMEs with the Community: a research report on the involvement of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in community causes (BCC, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505. doi:10.2307/257850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C.R., Auskalnis, R.J., & Ketchum, C.L. (1999). Purchasing from minority business enterprises: key success factors. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(1), 28–32. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.1999.tb00053.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R. and M.M. Jennings: 2000, Purchasing’s Contribution to the Socially Responsible Management of the Supply Chain (Arizona: Centre for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Arizona State University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T.: 2003, ‹Report on Supplier Diversity’. Prepared for the Procurement Task Force, New Detroit Inc. (Available online)

  • Davis, K. 1977, ‹The case for and against business assumptions of social responsibilities’, in Carroll, A.B. (Ed), Managing Corporate Social Responsibility (Little Brown & Co, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, L. (1994). ‹The Business Case for Women’s Equality: Is the carrot Better than the Stick?’. Employee Relations, 16(8), 5–18. doi:10.1108/01425459410073915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, L. (1999). Beyond the business case: a three-pronged approach to equality action. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(1), 9–19. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.1999.tb00185.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiversityInc.Com: 2002, The Business Case for Diversity: The Proof, the Strategies and the Industries in the Front Line, 3rd Edition (Allegiant Media Inc., New Brunswick, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, M.J., & Daily, C.M.1991, Purchasing from small minority-owned firms: corporate problems, (Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies/National Association of Purchasing Management, Tempe, Arizona).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, M.J., Enz, C.A., & Daily, C.M. (1991). Purchasing from Minority Small Business. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27(2), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91. doi:10.2307/258887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.2307/258557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). ‹What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258. doi:10.2307/256324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective, (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, 13 September, 32–33, pp. 122–126.

  • Gallorotti, G. (1995). It pays to be green: the managerial incentive structure and environmentally sound strategies. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 30(4), 38–57. doi:10.1016/0022-5428(95)90004-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giunipero, L.C. (1980). Differences between Minority and Non-Minority Suppliers. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 16(1), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giunipero, L.C. (1981). Developing Effective Minority Purchasing Programs. Sloan Management Review, 22(2), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31. doi:10.1177/000765039703600102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.L. (1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014. doi:10.2307/258963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, H·C., & Verma, A. (1996). Managing workforce diversity for competitiveness: the Canadian experience. International Journal of Manpower, 17(45), 14–29. doi:10.1108/01437729610127677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T., et al. (2003). The Effects of Diversity on Business Performance: Report of the Diversity Research Network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3–21. doi:10.1002/hrm.10061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G.P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595–649. doi:10.1108/07363760110410281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00585.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.A., Barber, A.E., & Hillman, A.J. (2001). Good Deeds and Misdeeds: A Mediated Model of the Effect of Corporate Social Performance on Organizational Attractiveness. Business & Society, 40(4), 397–415. doi:10.1177/000765030104000403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (1997). Event studies in management research: theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 626–657. doi:10.2307/257056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127. doi:10.2307/259398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S., & Wright, P.M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miliken, F. J. and L.L. Martins: 1996, ‹Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Change’, Academy of Management Review April, 402–433. doi:10.2307/258667.

  • Pearson, J.N., Fawcett, S.E., & Cooper, A. (1993). ‹Challenges and Approaches to Purchasing from Minority-Owned Firms’, Entrepreneurship. Theory into Practice, 18(2), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‹The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review December, 57–68

  • Posnikoff, J. (1997). Disinvestment from South Africa: they did well by doing good. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M., & Smallbone, D. (2003). Supplier Diversity Initiatives and the Diversification of Ethnic Minority businesses in the UK. Policy Studies, 24(4), 187–204. doi:10.1080/0144287042000216117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M., Theodorakopolous, N., & Worthington, I. (2007). Policy Transfer in Practice: Implementing Supplier Diversity in the UK. Public Administration: An International Quarterly, 85(3), 779–803. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00671.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M., & Verbeke, A. (1998). Corporate Strategies and Environmental Regulations: An Organizing Framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 363–375. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097–0266(199804)19:4<363::AID-SMJ974>3.0.CO;2-H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M.V., & Fouts, P.A. (1997). A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559. doi:10.2307/257052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M., & Ram, M. (2006). ‹Supplier Diversity and Minority Business Enterprise Development: Case Study Experience of Three U.S. Multinationals’, Supply Chain Management. International Journal (Toronto, Ont.), 11(1), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D.B., & Greening, D.W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672. doi:10.2307/257057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.J. (2005). Is There a Market for Virtue? The Business case for Corporate Social Responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4), 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.A., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S·B. (2002). Responsibility: the new business imperative. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S·B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance- Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S., & Cochran, P. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769. doi:10.2307/258044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718. doi:10.2307/258977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, I., Ram, M., Boyal, H., & Shah, M. (2008). Researching the Drivers of Socially Responsible Purchasing: A Cross-National Study of Supplier Diversity Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 319–331. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9400-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & Ferris, S. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: the effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 77–83. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<77::AID-SMJ810>3.0.CO;2-R

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. 1994, Case Study Research :Design and Methods, Second Edition, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, California).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. De Montfort University, Leicester, U.K.

    Ian Worthington

Authors
  1. Ian Worthington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Worthington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worthington, I. Corporate Perceptions of the Business Case for Supplier Diversity: How Socially Responsible Purchasing can ‘Pay’. J Bus Ethics 90, 47–60 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0025-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0025-5

Key words

Search

Navigation