Abstract
Uncertainty that arises from measurement error and parameter estimation can significantly affect the interpretation of musculoskeletal simulations; however, these effects are rarely addressed. The objective of this study was to develop an open-source probabilistic musculoskeletal modeling framework to assess how measurement error and parameter uncertainty propagate through a gait simulation. A baseline gait simulation was performed for a male subject using OpenSim for three stages: inverse kinematics, inverse dynamics, and muscle force prediction. A series of Monte Carlo simulations were performed that considered intrarater variability in marker placement, movement artifacts in each phase of gait, variability in body segment parameters, and variability in muscle parameters calculated from cadaveric investigations. Propagation of uncertainty was performed by also using the output distributions from one stage as input distributions to subsequent stages. Confidence bounds (5–95%) and sensitivity of outputs to model input parameters were calculated throughout the gait cycle. The combined impact of uncertainty resulted in mean bounds that ranged from 2.7° to 6.4° in joint kinematics, 2.7 to 8.1 N m in joint moments, and 35.8 to 130.8 N in muscle forces. The impact of movement artifact was 1.8 times larger than any other propagated source. Sensitivity to specific body segment parameters and muscle parameters were linked to where in the gait cycle they were calculated. We anticipate that through the increased use of probabilistic tools, researchers will better understand the strengths and limitations of their musculoskeletal simulations and more effectively use simulations to evaluate hypotheses and inform clinical decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackland, D. C., Y. C. Lin, and M. G. Pandy. Sensitivity of model predictions of muscle function to changes in moment arms and muscle-tendon properties: a Monte-Carlo analysis. J. Biomech. 45:1463–1471, 2012.
Anderson, F. C., and M. G. Pandy. Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. J. Biomech. 34:153–161, 2001.
Anderson, F. C., S. R. Goldberg, M. G. Pandy, and S. L. Delp. Contributions of muscle forces and toe-off kinematics to peak knee flexion during the swing phase of normal gait: an induced position analysis. J. Biomech. 37:731–737, 2004.
Andrews, J. G., and S. P. Misht. Methods for investigating the sensitivity of joint resultants to body segment parameter variations. J. Biomech. 29:651–654, 1996.
Arnold, E. M., S. R. Ward, R. L. Lieber, and S. L. Delp. A model of the lower limb for analysis of human movement. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38:269–279, 2010.
Benoit, D. L., D. K. Ramsey, M. Lamontagne, L. Xu, P. Wretenberg, and P. Renström. Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 24:152–164, 2006.
Chandler, R. F., C. E. Clauser, J. T. McConville, H. M. Reynolds, and J. W. Young. Investigation of Inertial Properties of the Human Body. Ohio: AMRL-TR-74, 1975.
Chiari, L., U. D. Croce, A. Leardini, and A. Cappozzo. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. Gait Posture 21:197–211, 2005.
Croce, U. D., A. Cappozzo, and D. Kerrigan. Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37:155–161, 1999.
Curran-Everett, D. Explorations in statistics: confidence intervals. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 33:87–90, 2009.
De Groote, F., A. Van Campen, I. Jonkers, and J. De Schutter. Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors. J. Biomech. 43:1876–1883, 2010.
Delp, S. L., J. P. Loan, M. G. Hoy, F. E. Zajac, E. L. Topp, and J. M. Rosen. An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37:757–767, 1990.
Delp, S. L., A. S. Arnold, R. A. Speers, and C. A. Moore. Hamstrings and Psoas lengths during normal and crouch gait: implications for muscle-tendon surgery. J. Orthop. Res. 14:144–151, 1996.
Delp, S. L., A. S. Arnold, and S. J. Piazza. Graphics-based modeling and analysis of gait abnormalities. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 8:227–240, 1998.
Delp, S. L., F. C. Anderson, A. S. Arnold, P. Loan, A. Habib, C. T. John, E. Guendelman, and D. G. Thelen. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54:1940–1950, 2007.
Fitzpatrick, C. K., C. W. Clary, P. J. Laz, and P. J. Rullkoetter. Relative contributions of design, alignment, and loading variability in knee replacement mechanics. J. Orthop. Res. 30:2015–2024, 2012.
Fregly, B. J., J. A. Reinbolt, K. L. Rooney, K. H. Mitchell, and T. L. Chmielewski. Design of patient-specific gait modifications for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54:1687–1695, 2007.
Fregly, B. J., T. F. Besier, D. G. Lloyd, S. L. Delp, S. A. Banks, M. G. Pandy, and D. D. D’Lima. Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads. J. Orthop. Res. 30:503–513, 2012.
Friederich, J. A., and R. A. Brand. Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. J. Biomech. 23:91–95, 1990.
Gao, B., and N. N. Zheng. Investigation of soft tissue movement during level walking: translations and rotations of skin markers. J. Biomech. 41:3189–3195, 2008.
Garner, B. A., and M. G. Pandy. Estimation of musculotendon properties in the human upper limb. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31:207–220, 2003.
Goehler, C. M., and W. M. Murray. The sensitivity of endpoint forces produced by the extrinsic muscles of the thumb to posture. J. Biomech. 43:1553–1559, 2010.
Halder, A., and S. Mahadevan. Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design. New York, NY: Wiley, 2000.
Hamby, D. M. A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environ. Monit. Assess. 32:135–154, 1994.
Herzog, W., A. C. Guimaraes, M. G. Anton, and K. A. Carter-Erdman. Moment-length relations of rectus femoris muscles of speed skaters/cyclists and runners. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 23:1289–1296, 1991.
Horsman, K., H. F. J. M. Koopman, F. C. T. van der Helm, L. P. Prosé, and H. E. J. Veeger. Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. Clin. Biomech. 22:239–247, 2007.
Langenderfer, J. E., P. J. Laz, A. J. Petrella, and P. J. Rullkoetter. An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics. J. Biomech. Eng. 130:014502, 2008.
Laz, P. J., and M. Browne. A review of probabilistic analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 224:927–943, 2010.
Lerner, Z. F., W. J. Board, and R. C. Browning. Effects of an obesity-specific marker set on estimated muscle and joint forces in walking. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 46:1261–1267, 2014.
Lieber, R. L., B. Ljung, and J. Friden. Intraoperative sacromere length measurements reveal differential design of human wrist extensor muscles. J. Exp. Biol. 200:19–25, 1997.
Lloyd, D. G., and T. F. Besier. An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J. Biomech. 36:765–776, 2003.
Melchers, R. E. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. New York, NY: Wiley, 2001.
Neptune, R. R., D. J. Clark, and S. A. Kautz. Modular control of human walking: a simulation study. J. Biomech. 42:1282–1287, 2009.
Nguyen, T. C., and K. J. Reynolds. The effect of variability in body segment parameters on joint moment using Monte Carlo simulations. Gait Posture 39:346–353, 2014.
Pavol, M. J., T. M. Owings, and M. D. Grabiner. Body segment inertial parameter estimation for the general population of older adults. J. Biomech. 35:707–712, 2002.
Perry, J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. Baltimore, MD: Stack, Inc., 1992.
Rao, G., D. Amarantini, E. Berton, and D. Favier. Influence of body segments’ parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait. J. Biomech. 39:1531–1536, 2006.
Reinbolt, J. A., R. T. Haftka, T. L. Chmielewski, and B. J. Fregly. Are patient-specific joint and inertial parameters necessary for accurate inverse dynamics analyses of gait? IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54:782–793, 2007.
Scovil, C. Y., and J. L. Ronsky. Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. J. Biomech. 39:2055–2063, 2006.
Shelburne, K. B., and M. G. Pandy. Determinants of cruciate-ligament loading during rehabilitation exercise. Clin. Biomech. 13:403–413, 1998.
Silverman, A. K., and R. R. Neptune. Muscle and prosthesis contributions to amputee walking mechanics: a modeling study. J. Biomech. 45:2271–2278, 2012.
Stagni, R., A. Leardini, A. Cappozzo, M. G. Benedetti, and A. Cappello. Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results. J. Biomech. 33:1479–1487, 2000.
Thelen, D. G., and F. C. Anderson. Using computed muscle control to generate forward dynamic simulations of human walking from experimental data. J. Biomech. 39:1107–1115, 2006.
Valente, G., F. Taddei, and I. Jonkers. Influence of weak hip abductor muscles on joint contact forces during normal walking: probabilistic modeling analysis. J. Biomech. 46:2186–2193, 2013.
Van der Krogt, M. M., S. L. Delp, and M. H. Schwartz. How robust is human gait to muscle weakness? Gait Posture 36:113–119, 2012.
Vaughan, C. L., B. L. Davis, and J. C. O’Connor. Dynamics of Human Gait. Cape Town: Kiboho Publishers, 1992.
Ward, S. R., L. H. Smallwood, and R. L. Lieber. Scaling of Human Lower Extremity Muscle Architecture to Skeletal Dimensions. ISB XXth Congr. 29th Annu. Meet., 2005.
Ward, S. R., C. M. Eng, L. H. Smallwood, and R. L. Lieber. Are current measurements of lower extremity muscle architecture accurate? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467:1074–1082, 2009.
Dempster, W. E. Space Requirements of the Seated Operator. Ohio: WADC-TR-55-159, Wright Air Development, 1955.
Wesseling, M., F. de Groote, and I. Jonkers. The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait. J. Biomech. 47:596–601, 2014.
Winby, C. R., D. G. Lloyd, and T. B. Kirk. Evaluation of different analytical methods for subject-specific scaling of musculotendon parameters. J. Biomech. 41:1682–1688, 2008.
Zajac, F. E., R. R. Neptune, and S. A. Kautz. Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking. Part I: introduction to concepts, power transfer, dynamics and simulations. Gait Posture 16:215–232, 2002.
Acknowledgments
We thank Katie Thompson for her assistance in figure preparation. This work was funded in part by the Donald W. Gustafson Fellowship in Orthopaedic Biomechanics awarded by the Gustafson Family Foundation.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to report in the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Michael R. Torry oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myers, C.A., Laz, P.J., Shelburne, K.B. et al. A Probabilistic Approach to Quantify the Impact of Uncertainty Propagation in Musculoskeletal Simulations. Ann Biomed Eng 43, 1098–1111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1181-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1181-7