Skip to main content
Log in

Phenotypes of COPD in an Austrian population

National data from the POPE study

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents a major global health problem; however, there are no data regarding clinical phenotypes of these patients in Austria.

Methods

This was an analysis from the Austrian cohort of the cross-sectional Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) study, which was offered to patients with stable COPD in a real-life setting. Patients were recruited at 5 different outpatient facilities in 3 different provinces in Austria. All consecutive patients aged ≥40 years with a diagnosis of COPD confirmed by a post-bronchodilator forced expired volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio <0.7 during a stable state (≥4 weeks without exacerbation or worsening of any relevant comorbidities) were considered eligible. The primary aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of phenotypes according to predefined criteria. Secondary aims included analyses of differences in patient characteristics, symptom load, comorbidities, and pharmacological treatment.

Results

Among 283 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 49.5% were considered non-exacerbators, 21.6% were classified as exacerbators with chronic bronchitis, 21.2% exacerbators without chronic bronchitis, and 7.8% were patients with an asthma-COPD overlap. Exacerbators had significantly higher prevalence of symptoms, lower lung function and exercise capacity, and a higher prevalence of comorbidities, such as heart failure and depression, compared with the other patient phenotypes. A large majority of patients with stable COPD in this cohort received inhaled triple therapy, irrespective of exacerbation history.

Conclusions

There were significant differences in COPD outcome measures between predefined phenotypes of COPD in this study. The majority of patients with stable COPD in this Austrian population were not treated according to current COPD guidelines. While non-exacerbators appear to have been overtreated, patients with an asthma-COPD overlap appear to have been undertreated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of COPD. 2016. http://goldcopd.org/ (Created 1 Feb 2016). Accessed 26 May 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weiss G, Steinacher I, Lamprecht B, Schirnhofer L, Kaiser B, Sönnichsen A, Studnicka M. Detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care in Salzburg, Austria: findings from the real world. Respiration. 2014;87(2):136–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Firlei N, Lamprecht B, Schirnhofer L, Kaiser B, Studnicka M. The prevalence of COPD in Austria—the expected change over the next decade. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007;119(17–18):513–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli BR, Criner G, Curtis JL, Fabbri LM, Goldin JG, Jones PW, Macnee W, Make BJ, Rabe KF, Rennard SI, Sciurba FC, Silverman EK, Vestbo J, Washko GR, Wouters EF, Martinez FJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: the future of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:598–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zbozinkova Z, Barczyk A, Tkacova R, Valipour A, Tudoric N, Zykov K, Somfay A, Miravitlles M, Koblizek V. POPE study: rationale and methodology of a study to phenotype patients with COPD in Central and Eastern Europe. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:611–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J. ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Miller MR, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Wanger J. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roca J, Burgos F, Sunyer J, Saez M, Chinn S, Antó JM, Rodríguez-Roisin R, Quanjer PH, Nowak D, Burney P, Group of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. References values for forced spirometry. Eur Respir J. 1998;11:1354–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lange P, Halpin DM, O’Donnell DE, MacNee W. Diagnosis, assessment, and phenotyping of COPD: beyond FEV1. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:3–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Agustí A, Celli B. Avoiding confusion in COPD: from risk factors to phenotypes to measures of disease characterisation. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:749–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miravitlles M, Vogelmeier C, Roche N, Halpin D, Cardoso J, Chuchalin AG, Kankaanranta H, Sandström T, Śliwiński P, Zatloukal J, Blasi F. A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe. Eur Respir J. 2016;47:625–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koblizek V, Milenkovic B, Barczyk A, Tkacova R, Somfay A, Zykov K, Tudoric N, Kostov K, Zbozinkova Z, Svancara J, Sorli J, Krams A, Miravitlles M, Valipour A. Phenotypes of COPD patients with a smoking history in Central and Eastern Europe: the POPE Study. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(5):1601446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cosio BG, Soriano JB, López-Campos JL, Calle M, Soler JJ, de-Torres JP, Marín JM, Martínez C, de Lucas P, Mir I, Peces-Barba G, Feu-Collado N, Solanes I, Alfageme I. CHAIN study. Distribution and outcomes of a phenotype-based approach to guide COPD management: results from the CHAIN cohort. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e160770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pasquale MK, Sun SX, Song F, Hartnett HJ, Stemkowski SA. Impact of exacerbations on health care cost and resource utilization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with chronic bronchitis from a predominantly Medicare population. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:757–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindberg A, Sawalha S, Hedman L, Larsson LG, Lundbäck B, Rönmark E. Subjects with COPD and productive cough have an increased risk for exacerbations and death. Respir Med. 2015;109:88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinez FJ, Calverley PM, Goehring UM, Brose M, Fabbri LM, Rabe KF. Effect of roflumilast on exacerbations in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease uncontrolled by combination therapy (REACT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:857–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wedzicha JA, Singh D, Vestbo J, Paggiaro PL, Jones PW, Bonnet-Gonod F, Cohuet G, Corradi M, Vezzoli S, Petruzzelli S, Agusti A, FORWARD Investigators. Extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol in severe COPD patients with history of exacerbations. Respir Med. 2014;108(8):1153–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. GINA. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2016. http://ginasthma.org/ (Created 1 Feb 2016). Accessed 26 May 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Price DB, Baker CL, Zou KH, Higgins VS, Bailey JT, Pike JS. Real-world characterization and differentiation of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy classification. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:551–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Corrado A, Rossi A. How far is real life from COPD therapy guidelines? An Italian observational study. Respir Med. 2012;106:989–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis KJ, Landis SH, Oh YM, Mannino DM, Han MK, van der Molen T, Aisanov Z, Menezes AM, Ichinose M, Muellerova H. Continuing to confront COPD International Physician Survey: physician knowledge and application of COPD management guidelines in 12 countries. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;10:39–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Salinas GD, Williamson JC, Kalhan R, Thomashow B, Scheckermann JL, Walsh J, Abdolrasulnia M, Foster JA. Barriers to adherence to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease guidelines by primary care physicians. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:171–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Menezes AM, Landis SH, Han MK, Muellerova H, Aisanov Z, van der Molen T, Oh YM, Ichinose M, Mannino DM, Davis KJ. Continuing to confront COPD International Surveys: comparison of patient and physician perceptions about COPD risk and management. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:159–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Miravitlles M, Andreu I, Romero Y, Sitjar S, Altés A, Anton E. Difficulties in differential diagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62:e68–e75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of COPD. 2017. http://goldcopd.org/. Accessed 8 Jan 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tudoric N, Koblizek V, Miravitlles M, Valipour A, Milenkovic B, Barczyk A, Somfay A, Zykov K, Kostov K, Zbozinkova Z, Svoboda M, Sorli J, Krams A, Tkacova R. GOLD 2017 on the way to a phenotypic approach? Analysis from the Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) Cohort. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(4):1602518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff of all study centers for their cooperation in collecting the study data. The electronic case report form design and statistical analysis for sample size calculations were performed by Z. Zbozinkova, J. Jarkovsky, and M. Uher, from the Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

The sponsor of the POPE study was the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for COPD and Respiratory Epidemiology, Vienna, Austria. This research institute received an unrestricted research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim, which provided partial support for this study but had no influence on the rationale, methodology or analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arschang Valipour MD, FCCP.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A. Valipour declares that he has received a research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim for the current study. G. Reiger, R. Zwick, B. Lamprecht, C. Kähler, and O.C. Burghuber declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reiger, G., Zwick, R., Lamprecht, B. et al. Phenotypes of COPD in an Austrian population. Wien Klin Wochenschr 130, 382–389 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-018-1347-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-018-1347-7

Keywords

Navigation