Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colectomy for the management of colon cancer remains a controversial therapeutic option, especially when the outcomes are compared with the historically accepted survival data and recurrence rates after open surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic colon resection for invasive colon adenocarcinoma.

Methods

A total of 129 patients underwent consecutive laparoscopic colectomies for colon adenocarcinoma (between April 1992 and 2004 January) by a single surgeon at a single institution. Records were analyzed retrospectively and follow-up data was obtained. The Student t-test, Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival data were used for statistical analysis.

Results

After patients with noninvasive disease on final pathology were excluded, the study population comprised 88 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomies for invasive colon cancer with > 2 years of follow-up. Of these cases, 81 (93%) were amenable for complete follow-up at 11years (41 women and 40 men; mean age, 76 years). Mean follow-up was 61 months. There was one perioperative death (1.2%), and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 13.6%. The average number of lymph nodes harvested was 10.1 (±6). There were no port site recurrences. The Kaplan-Meier survival data were as follows for 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival, respectively stage I (n = 34) 89% and 89%; stage II (n = 22), 65% and 59%; stage III (n = 19), 72% and 67%; stages I–III combined, (n = 75), 77% and 73%.

Conclusions

For this specific cohort of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic colectomies for invasive colon adenocarcinoma, the mean follow-up was > 5 years. Overall survival and disease-free survival for stage I, II, and III colon cancer as well as for stages I–III combined are favorable and comparable to historically acceptable open colectomy survival rates. Overall survival and disease-free survival after laparoscopic colectomy for invasive colon cancer is no worse, and perhaps better than, the previously reported rates for the same procedure done by an open technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Braga A Vignali L Gianotti W Zuliani G Radaelli P Gruarin P Dellabona V DiCarlo (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome Ann Surg 236 759–767

    Google Scholar 

  2. A Chapman MD Levitt P Hewett R Woods H Sheiner GJ Maddern (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic review Ann Surg 234 590–606

    Google Scholar 

  3. InstitutionalAuthorNameClinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group (1996) ArticleTitleEarly results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group Dis Colon Rectum 39 S53–S58

    Google Scholar 

  4. ME Franklin R Ramos D Rosenthal W Schuessler (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colonic procedures World J Surg 17 51–56 Occurrence Handle8447141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. ME Franklin D Rosenthal D Abrego-Medina JP Dorman JL Glass R Norem A Diaz (1996) ArticleTitleProspective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year results Dis Colon Rectum 39 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  6. L Gellman B Salky M Edye (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted colectomy Surg Endosc 10 1041–1045 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900236 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2crgsFY%3D Occurrence Handle8881048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. ES Hughes FT McDermatt AL Polglase WR Johnson (1983) ArticleTitleTumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large bowel cancer surgery Dis Colon Rectum 26 571–572 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyB287htFQ%3D Occurrence Handle6223795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas S Delgado A Castells P Taura JM Pique J Visa (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial Lancet 359 2224–2229 Occurrence Handle12103285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D Lechaux G Trebuchet JL Le Calve (2002) ArticleTitleFive-year results of 206 laparoscopic left colectomies for cancer Surg Endosc 16 1409–1412 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nktlWktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12140622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. K Lin DM Ota (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy for cancer: an oncologic feasible option Surg Oncol. 9 127–134 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3msV2juw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11356341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. SA Lord SW Larach A Ferrara PR Williamson CP Lago MW Lube (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma:. a three-year experience Dis Colon Rectum 39 148–154 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB38znt1I%3D Occurrence Handle8620780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. JW Lumley GA Fielding M Rhodes LK Nathanson S Siu RW Stitz (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients Dis Colon Rectum. 39 155–159 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB38znt1M%3D Occurrence Handle8620781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. H Nelson N Petrelli A Carlin J Couture J Fleshman J Guillem B Miedema (2001) ArticleTitleGuidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery J Natl Cancer Inst 93 583–587 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hvFejtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11309435

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. SK Patankar SW Larach A Ferrara PR Williamson T Gallagher S DeJesus S Namyanan (2003) ArticleTitleProspective Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period Dis Colon Rectum 46 601–611 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6616-z Occurrence Handle12792435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. EH Phillips ME Franklin BJ Carroll MJ Fallas R Ramos R Rosenthal (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy Ann Surg 216 703–707 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3czjt1c%3D Occurrence Handle1466626

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reilly WT, Nelson H, Schroeder G, Wieand HS, Bolton J, O’Connell MJ (1996) Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer: a rare but perhaps underestimated problem. 39: 200–207

  17. L Stocchi H Nelson (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update J Surg Onol 68 255–267 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czoslWlug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (2003) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence – SEER 9 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2002 Sub (1973–2000), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2003, based on the November 2002 submission. Available online at: http://www.seer.cancer.gov

  19. P Vukasin AE Ortega FL Greene GD Steele AJ Simons GJ Anthone LA Weston et al. (1996) ArticleTitleWound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection: results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons laparoscopic registry Dis Colon Rectum 39 20–23

    Google Scholar 

  20. SD Wexner SM Cohen (1995) ArticleTitlePort site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy Br J Surg 82 295–298 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3Mnjs1w%3D Occurrence Handle7795990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Linda Rolnitzky for her time and her biomathematical expertise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Salky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacob, B.P., Salky, B. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates. Surg Endosc 19, 643–649 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8921-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8921-y

Keywords

Navigation