Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic parenchymal preserving hepatic resections in semiprone position for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

All patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resections in the posterosuperior segments (LPSS) at our center were positioned in semiprone since August 2011. The aims of this study were to assess differences in perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomies (LLLS) performed in supine position and LPSS in semiprone position.

Methods

We reviewed our prospectively collected database of all liver resections performed between January 2012 and January 2015. LLLS and LPSS were compared with respect to demographics and perioperative outcomes.

Results

Forty-five patients underwent LLLS (n = 20) or LPSS (n = 25). There were no differences in patient demographics or tumor diameter (p = 0.946). There were no conversions. Pringle maneuver was not used in both groups. There was no difference in peroperative central venous pressure (p = 0.511). The median operative time in the LLLS group was 100 min (60–260) and 160 min (95–270) in the LPSS group (p = 0.002) with median intraoperative blood loss in the LLLS group of 50 ml (0–550) versus a larger 150 ml (50–700) (p = 0.010) for patients receiving LPSS. No patients required transfusion. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar in both groups. Median hospital stay was 6 days in both groups (p = 0.554).

Conclusion

LPSS in semiprone can be performed with similar clinical outcomes as a minor laparoscopic liver resection except for longer operative time and larger intraoperative blood loss without the need for transfusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J (1992) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor (abstract). Surg Endosc 6:99

    Google Scholar 

  2. Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F, Valleix D, Paineau J, Hamy A et al (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surg Endosc 17:23–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gamblin TC, Holloway SE, Heckman JT, Geller DA (2008) Laparoscopic resection of benign hepatic cysts: a new standard. J Am Coll Surg 207:731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC et al (2009) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 250:856–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, Lainas P, Smadja C, Franco D (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 198:173–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gayet B, Cavaliere D, Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H, Denet C et al (2007) Totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy. Am J Surg 194:685–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitta N, Sasaki A, Fujita T, Itabashi H, Hoshikawa K, Takahara T et al (2010) Laparoscopy-assisted major liver resections employing a hanging maneuver. Ann Surg 251:450–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) World consensus conference on laparoscopic surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Azagra JS, Goergen M, Brondello S, Calmes MO, Philippe P, Schmitz B (2009) Laparoscopic liver sectionectomy 2 and 3 (LLS 2 and 3): towards the “gold standard”. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 16:422–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hashimoto T, Kokudo N, Orii R, Seyama Y, Sano K, Imamura H et al (2007) Intraoperative blood salvage during liver resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 245:686–691

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Sabilini C, Berticelli J, Mahajna A (2005) Laparoscopic liver resections: a single center experience. Surg Endosc 19:886–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laurent A, Cherqui D, Lesurtel M, Brunetti F, Tayar C, Fagniez PL (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 138:763–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Troisi RI, Montalti R, Van Limmen JG, Cavaniglia D, Reyntjens K, Rogiers X et al (2014) Risk factors and management of conversions to an open approach in laparoscopic liver resection: analysis of 265 consecutive cases. HPB (Oxford) 16(1):75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ikeda T, Yonemura Y, Ueda N, Kabashima A, Shirabe K, Taketomi A et al (2011) Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy in the semi-prone position using the intrahepatic Glissonian approach and a modified hanging maneuver to minimize intraoperative bleeding. Surg Today 41(12):1592–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ikeda T, Mano Y, Morita K, Hashimoto N, Kayashima H, Masuda A et al (2013) Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy in semiprone position for right hepatic major resection. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 20(2):145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dagher I, Proske JM, Carloni A, Richa H, Tranchart H, Franco D (2007) Laparoscopic liver resections: results of 70 patients. Surg Endosc 21:619–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H, Denet C, Shahri NK, Gayet B (2006) Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 93:67–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kokudo N, Tada K, Seki M, Ohta H, Azekura K, Ueno M et al (2001) Anatomical major resection versus nonanatomical limited resection for liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 181(2):153–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Jong MC, Mayo SC, Pulitano C, Lanella S, Ribero D, Strub J et al (2009) Repeat curative intent liver surgery is safe and effective for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis: results from an international multi-institutional analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2141–2151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Viganò L, Russolillo N, Ferrero A, Langella S, Sperti E, Capussotti L (2012) Evolution of long-term outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases: analysis of actual 5-year survival rates over two decades. Ann Surg Oncol 19(6):2035–2044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomlinson JS, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Kornprat P, Gonen M et al (2007) Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. J Clin Oncol 25(29):4575–4580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. von Heesen M, Schuld J, Sperling J, Grünhage F, Lammert F, Richter S et al (2012) Parenchyma-preserving hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 397(3):383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher SB, Kneuertz PJ, Dodson RM, Patel SH, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM et al (2013) A comparison of right posterior sectorectomy with formal right hepatectomy: a dual-institution study. HPB 15(10):753–762

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu D’Hondt.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None

Conflicts of interest

None

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Institutinal Review Board approval (AZGS2015036 B396201524308).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Hondt, M., Yoshihara, E., Vansteenkiste, F. et al. Laparoscopic parenchymal preserving hepatic resections in semiprone position for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 255–262 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1375-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1375-6

Keywords

Navigation