Skip to main content
Log in

Zeta Potential of Selected Bacteria in Drinking Water When Dead, Starved, or Exposed to Minimal and Rich Culture Media

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The zeta potentials of E. coli, GFP (green fluorescence protein)-labeled E. coli, Salmonella Newport, and Pseudomonas sp. in different states (nutrient-starved and dead) and grown in rich and minimal media were measured. Capillary electrophoresis experiments were conducted to measure the zeta potential of the different cells suspended in a drinking water sample. Salmonella Newport strain showed a lower zeta potential compared to E. coli, GFP-labeled E. coli, and Pseudomonas sp. Starved E. coli cells had a lower zeta potential compared to E. coli cells grown under rich media conditions. Salmonella Newport cells grown in minimal media also had a lower zeta potential compared to rich, starved, and dead cells. The different bacterial cell types exhibited differences in size as well. These results suggest that when bacterial cells are present in drinking water they can exhibit significant heterogeneity in the size and zeta potential, depending on their physiological state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with Image. ImageJ Biophoton Int 11(7):36–42

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buszewski B, Szumski M, Klodzinska E, et al. (2003) Separation of bacteria by capillary. J Sep Sci 26:1045–1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Codony F, Morato J, Mas J (2005) Role of discontinuous chlorination on microbial production by drinking water biofilms. Water Res 39:1896–1906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cowan MM, Van der Mei HC, Stokroos I, et al. (1992) Heterogeneity of surfaces of subgingival bacteria as detected by zeta potential measurements. J Dent Res 71(11):1803–1806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Endley S, Lu L, Vega E, et al. (2003) Male-specific coliphages as an additional fecal contamination indicator for screening fresh carrots. J Food Prot 66(1):88–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guan H, Schulze-Makuch D, Schaffer S, et al. (2003) The effect of critical pH on virus fate and transport in saturated porous medium. Groundwater 41:701–708

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayashi H, Tsuneda S, Hirata A, et al. (2001) Soft particle analysis of bacterial cells and its interpretation of cell adhesion behaviors in terms of DLVO theory. Colloids Surf B Biointerf 2:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones JF, Feick JD, Imoudu D, et al. (2003) Oriented adhesion of Escherichia coli to polystyrene particles. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(11): 6515–6519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karniadakis G, Beskok A, Aluru N (2005) Miroflows and nanoflows: fundamentals and simulation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kilian HG, Gruler H, Bartkowiak D, et al. (2005) Stationary cell size distributions and mean protein chain length distributions of Archaea, Bacteria and Eukaryotes described with an increment model in terms of irreversible thermodynamics. Eur Phys J E 17:307–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kourkine IV, Mirjana RP, Davis E, et al. (2003) Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 bacteria by a combination of immunofluorescent staining and capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 24:655–661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JS, Ray RI, Lemieux EJ, Falster AU, et al. (2004) An evaluation of carbon steel corrosion under stagnant seawater conditions. Biofouling 20:237–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis PJ, Nwoguh CE, Barer MR, et al. (1994) Use of digitized video microscopy with a fluorogenic enzyme substrate to demonstrate cell- and compartment-specific gene expression in Salmonella enteritidis and Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 13(4):655–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyman R, Longnecker M (2001) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. 5th ed. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lytle DA, Rice EW, Clifford H, et al. (1999) Electrophoretic mobilities of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and wild-type Escherichia coli strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(7):3222–3225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Truesdail SE, Lukasik J, Farrah SR, et al. (1998) Analysis of bacterial deposition on metal (hydr)oxide-coated sand filter media. J. Colloid Interf Sci 203:369–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van Merode AEJ, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, et al. (2006) Influence of culture heterogeneity in cell surface charge on adhesion and biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 188(7):2421–2426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson K, Walker J (2005) Principles and techniques of biochemistry and molecular biology. 6th ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by NASA-AEMC program and the State of Texas Advanced Technology Programs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh D. Pillai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soni, K.A., Balasubramanian, A.K., Beskok, A. et al. Zeta Potential of Selected Bacteria in Drinking Water When Dead, Starved, or Exposed to Minimal and Rich Culture Media. Curr Microbiol 56, 93–97 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-9046-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-9046-z

Keywords

Navigation