Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of repaglinide and glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients previously treated with sulphonylureas

  • CLINICAL TRIALS
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of repaglinide, a novel oral prandial glucose regulator, with that of glibenclamide, an oral hypoglycaemic agent, in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: This was a 14-week, double-blind, parallel-group trail in which a total of 195 type 2 diabetic patients treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents were randomized to receive either repaglinide, administered preprandially three times daily, or glibenclamide, given preprandially once or twice daily, as per manufacturer's recommendations.

Results: By the end of the study, the 2-h postprandial blood glucose values were lower in the repaglinide group than in the glibenclamide group, with the difference approaching statistical significance (repaglinide, 8.1 (0.6) mol · 1−1 vs glibenclamide, 9.1 (0.6) mmol · 1−1; P = 0.07). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean blood glucose level at the end of the study between the two groups (repaglinide, 7.1 (0.5) mmol · 1−1 vs glibenclamide, 7.4 (0.5) mmol·1−1; P = 0.42), and baseline HbA1C values had decreased to the same degree in both the repaglinide [7.8% (0.1%) to 7.5% 0.1%)] and the glibenclamide groups [8.0 (0.1%) to 7.6 (0.1%)]. There are no significant differences between the repaglinide and glibenclamide treatment groups in the levels of fasting blood glucose, fructosamine, fasting C-peptide, insulin and proinsulin. Neither treatment group showed any clinically significant changes in blood lipid profiles. Repaglinide and glibenclamide were both well tolerated. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to adverse events, including hypoglycaemic episodes and weight change. No accumulation of repaglinide was apparent during the maintenance period.

Conclusion: Repaglinide is as well tolerated as glibenclamide and is equally effective in the management of type 2 diabetes. Repaglinide may, however, offer an improvement in postprandial blood glucose control compared with glibenclamide, thereby helping to reduce the relative long-term risk of diabetic complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 14 January 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 3 December 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landgraf, R., Bilo, H. & Müller, P. A comparison of repaglinide and glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients previously treated with sulphonylureas. E J Clin Pharmacol 55, 165–171 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050613

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050613

Navigation