Skip to main content
Log in

On the concept of remission in schizophrenia

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Criteria for remission in schizophrenia have recently been presented. It is unclear how many acutely ill patients meet these criteria and how they compare with previously suggested definitions.

Objectives and methods

We re-analysed seven anti-psychotic drug trials (n = 1,708) of patients with schizophrenia to find out how many met the new remission criteria and their single components, how many met two previously used remission criteria, and how many met simpler measures of response (at least 50% Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [BPRS] reduction, a Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] improvement score of at least ‘much better’ or a CGI severity score of ‘mild or better’).

Results

Thirty-seven percent/41% (last observation carried forward [LOCF]/completer analysis [CO]) of the initially acutely ill patients with positive symptoms met the severity criteria of remission at 4 weeks, and 27%/52% (worst case/CO) met the severity and time criteria at 1 year. Only 13%/21% (LOCF) met the severity criteria at 4 weeks/1 year when an item threshold ‘at best very mild symptoms’ was applied, and almost no patients were absolutely symptom-free. The psychotic symptoms component was more difficult to achieve than the negative component. The criteria were more stringent than ‘at least 50% BPRS reduction’ and than ‘CGI improvement score of at least much better.’ However, the definition ‘CGI severity score mild or better’ was of a stringency similar to the new remission criteria, which probably explains why fewer patients met previously defined criteria that included this scale.

Conclusion

The new remission criteria proved to be an achievable goal for clinical trials. A consensus on the application of their time component is still needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders, third revision, revised (DSM-III-R). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen NC (1989) Scale for the assessment of negative symptoms. Br J Psychiatry 155(Suppl 7):53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen N, Carpenter W, Kane J, Lasser R, Marder S, Weinberger D (2005) Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry 62:441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis LA, Miller BG, Seroquel Trial 13 Study Group (1997) Multiple fixed doses of “seroquel” (quetiapine) in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: a comparison with haloperidol and placebo. Biol Psychiatry 42:233–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley CM, Tollefson GD, Tran P, Satterlee W, Sanger T, Hamilton S, Olanzapine HGAD Study Group (1996) Olanzapine versus haloperidol and placebo. Acute phase results of the american double-blind olanzapine trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 14:111–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer P, Lecrubier Y, Puech AJ, Dewailly J, Aubin F (1995) Treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia with amisulpride. Br J Psychiatry 166:68–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carrière P, Bonhomme D, Lempérière T (2000) Amisulpride has superior benefit: risk profile to haloperidol in schizophrenia: results of a multicentre, double-blind study (the Amisulpride study group). Eur Psychiatr 15:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colonna L, Saleem P, Dondey-Nouvel L, Rein W, Amisulpride Study Group (2000) Long-term safety and efficacy of amisulpride in subchronic or chronic schizophrenia. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 15:13–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa e Silva JA (1989) Comparative double-blind study of amisulpride versus haloperidol in the treatment of acute psychotic states. Amisulpride. Expansion Scientifique Francaise, Paris, pp 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Danion JM, Rein W, Fleurot O (1999) Improvement of schizophrenic patients with primary negative symptoms treated with amisulpride. Am J Psychiatry 156:610–616

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Hert M, van Winkel R, Wampers M, Kane J, van Os J, Peuskens J (2007) Remission criteria for schizophrenia: evaluation in a large naturalistic cohort. Schizophr Res 92:68–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delcker A, Schoon ML, Oczkowski B, Gaertner HJ (1990) Amisulpride versus haloperidol in treatment of schizophrenic patients- results of a double-blind study. Pharmacopsychiatry 23:125–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty JP, Bossle CA, Lachaux B, Bouhours P, Zhu Y, Lasser R, Gharabawi GM (2007) Patient-based and clinician-based support for the remission criteria in schizophrenia. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 22:51–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle AC, Pollack MH (2003) Establishment of remission criteria for anxiety disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 64:40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emsley R, Rabinowitz J, Medori R, Early Psychosis Global Working Group (2007) Remission in early psychosis: rates, predictors, and clinical and functional outcome correlates. Schizophr Res 89:129–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guy W (1976) Clinical Global Impressions. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised (DHEW Publ. no. ADM 76-338). National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD, pp 218–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding CM, Brooks GW, Ashikaga T, Strauss JS, Breier A (1987) The Vermont longitudinal-study of persons with severe mental-illness. 1. Methodology, study sample, and overall status 32 years later. Am J Psychiatr 144:718–726

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haro JM, Kamath SA, Ochoa S, Novick D, Rele K, Fargas A, Rodriguez MJ, Rele R, Orta J, Kharbeng A, Araya S, Gervin M, Alonso J, Mavreas V, Lavrentzou E, Liontos N, Gregor K, Jones PB (2003) The Clinical Global Impression—Schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 107:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haro JM, Edgell ET, Novick D, Alonso J, Kennedy L, Jones PB, Ratcliffe M, Breier A (2005) Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia: 6-month results of the Pan-European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 111:220–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haro JM, Ochoa S, Gervin M, Mavreas V, Jones P (2007) Assessment of remission in schizophrenia with the CGI and CGI-SCH scales. Acta Psychiatr Scand 115:163–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison G, Hopper K, Craig T, Laska E, Siegel C, Wanderling J, Dube KC, Ganev K, Giel R, An der Heiden W, Holmberg SK, Janca A, Lee PWH, Leon CA, Malhotra S, Marsella AJ, Nakane Y, Sartorius N, Shen Y, Skoda C, Thara R, Tsirkin SJ, Varma VK, Walsh D, Wiersma D (2001) Recovery from psychotic illness: a 15- and 25-year international follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry 178:506–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helldin L, Kane JM, Karilampi U, Norlander T, Archer T (2006) Remission and cognitive ability in a cohort of patients with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 40:738–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helldin L, Kane JM, Karilampi U, Norlander T, Archer T (2007) Remission in prognosis of functional outcome: a new dimension in the treatment of patients with psychotic disorders. Schizophr Res 93:160–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber G, Gross G, Schuttler R, Linz M (1980) Longitudinal-studies of schizophrenic-patients. Schizophr Bull 6:592–605

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kane JM, Honigfeld G, Singer J, Meltzer H, Clozaril Collaborative Study Group (1988) Clozapine for the treatment-resistant schizophrenic. A double-blind comparison with chlorpromazine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45:789–796

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA (1987) The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 13:261–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kissling S, Heres S, Lloyd K, Sacchetti E, Bouhours P, Medori R, Llorca PM (2005) Direct transition to long-acting risperidone- analysis of long-term efficacy. J Psychopharmacol 19:15–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein HE, Dieterle D, Rüther E, Eben E, Nedopil N, Hippius H (1985) A double-blind comparison of amisulpride vs. haloperidol in acute schizophrenic patients. In: Pichot P, Berner P, Wolf R, Thau K (eds) Psychiatry, the state of the art. Plenum, New York, pp 687–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasser RA, Bossie CA, Gharabawi GM, Kane JM (2005) Remission in schizophrenia: results from a 1-year study of long-acting risperidone injection. Schizophr Res 77:215–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leucht S, Engel RR (2006) The relative sensitivity of the clinical global impressions scale and the brief psychiatric rating scale in antipsychotic drug trials. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:406–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leucht S, Lasser R (2006) The concepts of remission and recovery in schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry 39:161–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leucht S, Pitschel-Walz G, Engel R, Kissling W (2002) Amisulpride—an unusual atypical antipsychotic. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Psychiatry 159:180–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leucht S, Kane JM, Kissling W, Hamann J, Etschel E, Engel RR (2005a) Clinical implications of BPRS scores. Br J Psychiatry 187:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leucht S, Kane JM, Kissling W, Hamann J, Etschel E, Engel RR (2005b) What does the PANSS mean? Schizophr Res 79:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leucht S, Kane JM, Etschel E, Hamann J, Kissling W, Engel RR (2006) Linking the PANSS, BPRS and CGI. Clinical implications. Neuropsychopharmacology 3:2318–2325

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman R, Kopelowicz A, Ventura J, Gutkind D (2002) Operational criteria and factors related to recovery from schizophrenia. Int Rev Psychiatry 14:256–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman JA, Phillips M, Gu H, Stroup S, Zhang P, Kong L, Ji ZKG, Hamer RM (2003) Atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in treatment-naive first-episode schizophrenia: a 52-week randomized trial of clozapine vs chlorpromazine. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:995–1003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marder SR, Meibach RC (1994) Risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 151:825–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ, Boyer P, Fleurot O, Rein W (1997) Improvement of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia with amisulpride: a comparison with haloperidol. Psychopharmacology 132:396–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer A, Martin S, Loo H, Peuskens J (2004) A double-blind, randomized comparative trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine for 6 months in the treatment of schizophrenia. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 19:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overall JE, Gorham DR (1962) The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Rep 10:790–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Peuskens J, Link CGG (1997) A comparison of quetiapine and chlorpromazine in the treatment of schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 96:265–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peuskens J, Bech P, Möller HJ, Bale R, Fleurot O, Rein W, Amisulpride Study Group (1999) Amisulpride vs. risperidone in the treatment of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 88:107–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pichot P, Boyer P (1988) Etude multicentrique controlée en double insu: amisulpride (Solian 200) versus halopéridol à forte dose dans les états psychotiques aigus. Ann Psychiatr 3:326–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Puech A, Fleurot O, Rein W (1998) Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic, in the treatment of acute episodes of schizophrenia: a dose-ranging study vs. haloperidol. Acta Psychiatr Scand 98:65–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sechter D, Peuskens J, Fleurot O, Rein W, Lecrubier Y (2002) Amisulpride vs. risperidone in chronic schizophrenia: results of a 6-month double-blind study. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:1071–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sethuraman G, Taylor CC, Enerson M, Dunayevich E (2005) A retrospective comparison of cumulative time spent in remission during treatment with olanzapine or risperidone among patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 79:337–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Small JG, Hirsch SR, Arvanitis LA, Miller BG, Link CGG, Seroquel Study Group (1997) Quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia. A high- and low-dose comparison with placebo. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:549–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speller JC, Barnes TRE, Curson DA, Pantelis C, Alberts JL (1997) One-year, low-dose neuroleptic study of in-patients with chronic schizophrenia characterised by persistent negative symptoms—amisulpride vs. haloperidol. Br J Psychiatry 171:564–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Os J, Burns T, Cavallaro R, Leucht S, Peuskens J, Helldin L, Bernardo M, Arango C, Fleischhacker W, Lachaux B, Kane JM (2006a) Standardized remission criteria in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 113:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Os J, Drukker M, Campo JA, Meijer J, Bak M, Delespaul P (2006b) Validation of remission criteria for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 163:2000–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlbeck K, Tuunainen A, Ahokas A, Leucht S (2001) Drop-out rates in randomised antipsychotic drug trials. Psychopharmacology 155:230–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel H, Grunder G, Hillert A, Philipp M, Gattaz WF, Sauer H, Adler G, Schroder J, Rein W, Benkert O (1998) Amisulpride versus flupentixol in schizophrenia with predominantly positive symptomatology—a double-blind controlled study comparing a selective D-2-like antagonist to a mixed D-1-/D-2-like antagonist. Psychopharmacology 137:223–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler B (1989) Study of the efficacy of a substituted benzamide amisulpride, versus haloperidol, in productive schizophrenia. Amisulpride. Expansion Scientifique Francaise, Paris, pp 73–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to SanofiAventis for allowing us to analyse individual patient data from their databases. The study was supported by the American Psychiatric Association/AstraZeneca Young Minds in Psychiatry Award 2004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Leucht.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material

Supplement 1

(DOC 205 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leucht, S., Beitinger, R. & Kissling, W. On the concept of remission in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology 194, 453–461 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0857-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0857-1

Keywords

Navigation