Zusammenfassung
Ziel
Vergleich der immunhistochemischen Expression des Somatostatinrezeptor- (SSTR-)Subtyps 2 mit der quantitativen 68Ga-DOTATATE-PET bei neuroendokrinen Tumoren (NET).
Patienten und Methoden
Bei 27 Patienten mit metastasierten NET wurde die immunhistochemische Expression des SSTR-Typs 2 anhand einer Graduierung (0–3) bestimmt. Zusätzlich konnte bei 25/27 Patienten der Proliferationsindex Ki-67 ermittelt werden. Damit verglichen wurde die Speicherung von 68Ga-DOTATATE anhand des SUVmax (SUV „standardized uptake value“).
Ergebnisse
NET ohne SSTR-Expression wiesen einen signifikant (p <0,05) niedrigeren SUVmax auf als Tumoren mit nachgewiesener Expression von SSTR. Es zeigte sich eine signifikante Korrelation zwischen der SSTR-Expression (Grad 0 fehlend, Grad 1 mäßig, Grade 2 und 3 deutlich) und dem SUVmax (r=0,40, p <0,05). Der Ki-67 korrelierte signifikant invers mit der SSTR-Expression (r=−0,42, p <0,05) und nicht signifikant invers mit dem SUVmax (r=−0,33, p=0,11).
Schlussfolgerung
Die 68Ga-DOTATATE-Speicherung in der PET korreliert mit der immunhistochemischen SSTR-Expression. Jedoch können auch immunhistochemisch SSTR-negative NET in der 68Ga-DOTATATE-PET eine Speicherung aufweisen.
Abstract
Purpose
The immunohistochemical expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtype 2 was compared to quantitative 68Ga-DOTATATE PET in neuroendocrine tumors (NET).
Material and methods
In 27 patients suffering from metastatic NET the expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR, score 0–3) and the Ki-67 index were assessed. The immunohistochemical findings were compared with the 68Ga-DOTATATE PET uptake in these tumors using the SUVmax (standardized uptake value). Both values were compared with the Ki-67 proliferation index.
Results
The SUVmax in NET without SSTR expression was significantly lower compared to those with SSTR expression (p <0.05), even though 3 out of 5 NETs with a score of 0 showed a high uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE. The SUVmax correlated significantly (r=0.40, p <0.05) with the score of immunohistochemical SSTR expression (negative, score 0, moderate, score 1 and high, scores 2 and 3). The Ki-67 index correlated inversely with the SSTR expression score (r=−0.42, p <0.05), but not significantly with the SUVmax (r=−0.33, p=0.11).
Conclusion
68Ga-DOTATATE uptake was moderately correlated with the results of immunohistochemical SSTR analyses. However, SSTR negative NET may show high uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE.
Literatur
Asnacios A, Courbon F, Rochaix P et al (2008) Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy and somatostatin receptor subtype 2 expression: new prognostic factors for malignant well-differentiated endocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol 26:963–970
Beuthien-Baumann B, Strumpf A, Zessin J et al (2007) Diagnostic impact of PET with 18F-FDG, 18F-DOPA and 3-O-methyl-6-[18F]fluoro-DOPA in recurrent or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1604–1609
Breeman WA, de Jong M, de Blois E et al (2005) Radiolabelling DOTA-peptides with 68 Ga. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:478–485
Buchmann I, Henze M, Engelbrecht S et al (2007) Comparison of 68-Ga-DOTATOC PET and 111-In-DTPAOC (octreoscan) SPECT in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1617–1626
De Jong M, Kwekkeboom D, Valkema R, Krenning EP (2003) Radiolabelled peptides for tumour therapy: current status and future directions. Plenary lecture at the EANM 2002. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:463–469
Decristoforo C, Mather SJ, Cholewinski W et al (2000) 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC: a new 99mTc-labelled radiopharmaceutical for imaging somatostatin receptor-positive tumours; first clinical results and intra-patient comparison with 111In-labelled octreotide derivatives. Eur J Nucl Med 27:1318–1325
Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D et al (2007) 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med 48:508–518
Garin E, Le Jeune F, Devillers A et al (2009) Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with metastatic endocrine tumors. J Nucl Med 50:858–864
Hartmann H, Zophel K, Freudenberg R et al (2009) Radiation exposure of patients during 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT examinations. Nuklearmedizin 48:201–207
Haug A, Auernhammer CJ, Wangler B et al (2009) Intraindividual comparison of (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (18)F-DOPA PET in patients with well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:765–770
Kauhanen S, Seppanen M, Minn H et al (2007) Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA) positron emission tomography as a tool to localize an insulinoma or beta-cell hyperplasia in adult patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1237–1244
Kayani I, Bomanji JB, Groves A et al (2008) Functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with combined PET/CT using 68Ga-DOTATATE (DOTA-DPhe1,Tyr3-octreotate) and 18F-FDG. Cancer 112:2447–2455
Miederer M, Seidl S, Buck A et al (2009) Correlation of immunohistopathological expression of somatostatin receptor 2 with standardised uptake values in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:48–52
Montravers F, Grahek D, Kerrou K et al (2006) Can fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET replace somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with digestive endocrine tumors? J Nucl Med 47:1455–1462
Papotti M, Bongiovanni M, Volante M et al (2002) Expression of somatostatin receptor types 1–5 in 81 cases of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors. A correlative immunohistochemical and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis. Virchows Arch 440:461–475
Prasad V, Ambrosini V, Hommann M et al (2009) Detection of unknown primary neuroendocrine tumours (CUP-NET) using (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC receptor PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:67–77
Ruf J, Heuck F, Schiefer J et al (2010) Impact of multiphase Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT on therapy management in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 91:101–109
Seemann MD (2007) Detection of metastases from gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: prospective comparison of 18F-TOCA PET, triple-phase CT, and PET/CT. Technol Cancer Res Treat 6:213–220
Timmers HJ, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA et al (2009) Comparison of 18F-fluoro-L-DOPA, 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose, and 18F-fluorodopamine PET and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in the localization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:4757–4767
Volante M, Brizzi MP, Faggiano A et al (2007) Somatostatin receptor type 2A immunohistochemistry in neuroendocrine tumors: a proposal of scoring system correlated with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Mod Pathol 20:1172–1182
Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A et al (2008) One hundred years after „carcinoid“: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 26:3063–3072
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dieser Beitrag ist als eine Originalpublikation anzusehen und aus formalen Gründen im Leitthema dieser Ausgabe eingeordnet.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haug, A., Assmann, G., Rist, C. et al. Quantifizierung der Somatostatinrezeptorexpression neuroendokriner Tumoren mit der 68Ga-DOTATATE-PET/CT. Radiologe 50, 349–354 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-009-1972-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-009-1972-2
Schlüsselwörter
- Somatostatinrezeptor (SSTR)
- Neuroendokrine Tumoren (NET)
- Positronenemissionstomographie (PET)
- „Standardized uptake value“ (SUV)
- Gallium-68 (68Ga)