Skip to main content
Log in

Spinale Tumoren

Spinal tumors

  • CME - Weiterbildung - Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Spinale Tumoren können intramedullär, innerhalb der Meningen (intradural), zwischen Meningen und Knochen (extradural) auftreten oder von anderen Lokalisationen sekundär zu einer Beteiligung der Wirbelsäule führen. Das Wirbelkörperhämangiom ist der häufigste gutartige Tumor der Wirbelsäule. Zu den häufigsten malignen spinalen Tumoren gehören Metastasen, das Lymphom und das multiple Myelom. Primäre Knochentumoren der Wirbelsäule sind im Vergleich dazu eher selten und zeigen auch oft charakteristische Bildbefunde. Für die Differenzialdiagnostik spielen das Patientenalter, die Lokalisation des Tumors und die magnetresonanz- und computertomographischen Befunde eine wichtige Rolle.

Abstract

Spinal tumors can be intramedullary, intradural (within the meninges), or extradural (between the meninges and the bones), or they may extend secondary to the spine from other locations. Vertebral hemangioma represents the most common benign tumor of the spine. Metastases, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma are the most frequent malignant spinal tumors. Primary osseous tumors of the spine, in contrast, are rare conditions but may demonstrate typical imaging findings. For the differential diagnosis, the patient’s age, the topographic localization of the mass, and morphologic features of the lesion as depicted by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging play important roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Balerieux DLF (1999) Spinal cord tumors. Eur Radiol 9:1252–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beall DP, Googe DJ, Emery RL et al (2007) Extramedullary intradural spinal tumors: a pictorial review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36(5):185–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Block F (2006) Klinik spinaler Raumforderungen. Radiologe 46(12):1025–1028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulsara KR, Zomorodi AR, Villavicencio AT et al (2001) Clinical outcome differences for lipomyelomeningoceles, intraspinal lipomas, and lipomas of the filum terminale. Neurosurg Rev 24(4):192–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Conti P, Pansini G, Mouchaty H et al (2004) Spinal neurinomas: retrospective analysis and long-term outcome of 179 consecutively operated cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 61(1):34–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Daltrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM et al (2001) Whole body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG-PET. Am J Roentgenol 177:229–236

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Verdelhan O, Haegelen C, Carsin-Nicol B et al (2005) MR imaging features of spinal schwannomas and meningiomas. J Neuroradiol 32(1):42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fries P, Runge VM, Kirchin MA et al (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine at 3 Tesla. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 12(3):238–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasegawa M, Fujisawa H, Hayashi Y et al (2001) Surgical pathology of spinal schwannomas: a light and electron microscopic analysis of tumor capsules. Neurosurgery 49(6):1388–1392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Howman-Giles R, Shaw PJ, Uren RF, Chung DK (2007) Neuroblastoma and other neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med 37(4):286–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahan H, Sklar EM, Post MJ, Bruce JH (1996) MR characteristics of histopathologic subtypes of spinal ependymoma. Am J Neuroradiol 17(1):143–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lichy MP, Wietek BM, Mugler JP 3rd et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab, 3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling efficiency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiences. Invest Radiol 40(12):754–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphey MD, Andrews CL, Flemming DJ et al (1996) Primary tumors of the spine: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 16:1131–1158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mut M, Schiff D, Shaffrey ME (2005) Metastasis to nervous system: spinal epidural and intramedullary metastases. J Neurooncol 75(1):43–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park JC, Chung CK, Kim HJ (2003) Iatrogenic spinal epidermoid tumor. A complication of spinal puncture in an adult. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 105(4):281–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodallec MH, Feydy A, Larousserie F et al (2008) Diagnostic imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say. Radiographics 28(4):1019–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodegerdts EA, Boss A, Riemarzik K et al (2006) 3D imaging of the whole spine at 3 T compared to 1.5 T: initial experiences. Acta Radiol 47(5):488–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross JS, Brant-Zawadzki M, Moore KR et al. (2004) Spine, 1st edn. Amyrsis. Elsevier Saunders, Amsterdam

  19. Runge VM (2009) SNR at 3 T. In: Runge VM, Nitz WR, Schmeets SH (eds) The physics of clinical MRI taught through images. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 220–221

  20. Shapiro MD (2006) MR imaging of the spine at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14(1):97–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Goethem JWM, Van den Hauwe L, Ozsarlak O et al (2004) Spinal tumors. Eur J Radiol 50:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang C (2008) Spinal hemangioblastoma: report on 68 cases. Neurol Res 30(6):603–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wetzel SG, Johnson G, Tan AG et al (2002) Three-dimensional, T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the brain with a volumetric interpolated examination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(6):995–1002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F.J. Ahlhelm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahlhelm, F., Fries, P., Nabhan, A. et al. Spinale Tumoren. Radiologe 50, 165–180 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-009-1841-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-009-1841-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation