Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement in tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life and psychological comorbidities by cochlear implantation in single-sided deaf patients

Verbesserung von Tinnitusdistress, Lebensqualität und psychologischen Komorbiditäten durch Cochleaimplantation einseitig ertaubter Patienten

  • Original articles
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) lack the ability localize sound sources and have difficulty with speech-in-noise hearing. In addition, there is a high prevalence of tinnitus distress. These problems may result in reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological comorbidities. This study aimed to investigate the influence of treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) on HRQoL, tinnitus distress, psychological comorbidities, and audiological parameters in SSD patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included 20 patients with postlingually acquired SSD (13 women, 7 men, mean age 57.0 years). Data on HRQoL were collected with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 Survey (SF-36). Tinnitus distress was assessed with the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), psychological comorbidities were evaluated with validated questionnaires, and speech perception and hearing ability were measured with validated speech tests.

Results

Postoperatively, the mean total NCIQ score (p < 0.0001) and four subscores improved significantly, as did tinnitus distress (p < 0.05). Anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire, GAD-7) decreased significantly after CI. Speech perception improved significantly, particularly “hearing with background noise” (p < 0.05, Oldenburg Inventory, OI) and “localization” (p < 0.001, OI), as well as the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OlSa) scores for with vs. without CI when speech was presented from the SSD side and noise was presented from the normal hearing side (SSSDNNH; p < 0.005).

Conclusion

CI in SSD patients is a powerful procedure to improve HRQoL, reduce tinnitus distress, and improve psychological comorbidities. Additionally, it is beneficial for hearing improvement, particularly in noise and for directional hearing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Andersson G, Freijd A, Baguley DM, Idrizbegovic E (2009) Tinnitus distress, anxiety, depression, and hearing problems among cochlear implant patients with tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol 20(5):315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R et al (2010) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and Tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arndt S, Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Hassepass F, Beck R, Wesarg T (2017) Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss. HNO 65(Suppl 2):98–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-016-0297-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arts RA, George EL, Stokroos RJ, Vermeire K (2012) Review: cochlear implants as a treatment of tinnitus in single-sided deafness. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 20(5):398–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blasco MA, Redleaf MI (2014) Cochlear implantation in unilateral sudden deafness improves tinnitus and speech comprehension: meta-analysis and systematic review. Otol Neurotol 35(8):1426–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buechner A, Brendel M, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Wenzel G, Frohne-Buechner C, Jaeger B, Lenarz T (2010) Cochlear implantation in unilateral deaf subjects associated with ipsilateral tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 31(9):1281–1285

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cabral F Jr, Hausen Pinna M, Dourado Alves R, Felice dos Santos Malerbi A, Ferreira Bento R (2016) Cochlear implantation and single-sided deafness: a systematic review of the literature. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 20(1):69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carver CS (1997) You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med 4(1):92–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Erbele ID, Bernstein JG, Schuchman GI, Brungart DS, Rivera A (2015) An initial experience of cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness after prior osseointegrated hearing device. Otol Neurotol 36(1):e24–e29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fliege H, Rose M, Arck P, Walter OB, Kocalevent RD, Weber C, Klapp BF (2005) The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples. Psychosom Med 67(1):78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gardell IS, Adresen K, Faber CE, Wanscher JH (2015) Bone-anchored hearing aids are effective and associated with a high degree of satisfaction. Dan Med J 62(7):A5108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gartrell BC, Jones HG, Kan A, Buhr-Lawler M, Gubbels SP, Litovsky RY (2014) Investigating long-term effects of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a best practice model for longitudinal assessment of spatial hearing abilities and Tinnitus handicap. Otol Neurotol 35(9):1525–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goebel G, Hiller W (1994) The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire. HNO 42(3):166–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassepass F, Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Wesarg T (2016) Cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation in single-sided deafness after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(9):2373–2383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3801-8 (Epub 2015 Oct 23)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hautzinger M, Bailer M (1993) Allgemeine Depressions Skala. Manual. Beltz, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM (1993) The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 2(3):217–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):756–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Holube BK (1994) Examination of a modified version of a questionnaire to assess subjective hearing handicap and its relation to the Monosyllabic Rhyme Test. Audiol Akust 33:22–35

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jacob R, Stelzig Y, Nopp P, Schleich P (2011) Audiologische Ergebnisse mit Cochleaimplantat bei einseitiger Taubheit. HNO 59(5):453–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kitterick PT, Lucas L (2016) Predicting speech perception outcomes following cochlear implantation in adults with unilateral deafness or highly asymmetric hearing loss. Cochlear Implants Int 17(Suppl 1):51–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2016.1155806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kitterick PT, O’Donoghue GM, Edmondson-Jones M, Marshall A, Jeffs E, Craddock L, Riley A, Green K, O’Driscoll M, Jiang D, Nunn T, Saeed S, Aleksy W, Seeber BU (2014) Comparison of the benefits of cochlear implantation versus contralateral routing of signal hearing aids in adult patients with single-sided deafness: study protocol for a prospective within-subject longitudinal trial. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 14:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitterick PT, Smith SN, Lucas L (2016) Hearing instruments for unilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Ear Hear 37(5):495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knopke S, Szcezepek AJ, Häussler SM, Gräbel S, Olze H (2017) Cochlear implantation of bilaterally deafened patients with Tinnitus induces sustained decrease of Tinnitus-related distress. Front Neurol 8:158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kollmeier B, Wesselkamp M (1997) Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 102(4):2412–2421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Laske RD, Röösli C, Pfiffner F, Veraguth D, Huber AM (2015) Functional results and subjective benefit of a Transcutaneous Bone conduction device in patients with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 36(7):1151–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Levenstein S, Prantera C, Varvo V et al (1993) Development of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: a new tool for psychosomatic research. J Psychosom Res 37(1):19–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lucas L, Katiri R, Kitterick PT (2017) The psychological and social consequences of single sided deafness in adulthood. Int J Audiol 13:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mertens G, Kleine Punte A, De Ridder D, Van de Heyning P (2013) Tinnitus in a single-sided deaf ear reduces speech reception in the nontinnitus ear. Otol Neurotol 34(4):662–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Olze H, Szczepek AJ, Haupt H et al (2011) Cochlear implantation has a positive influence on quality of life, tinnitus, and psychological comorbidity. Laryngoscope 121(10):2220–2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Olze H, Gräbel S, Haupt H, Förster U, Mazurek B (2012) Extra benefit of a second cochlear implant with respect to health-related quality of life and Tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 33(7):1169–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Punte AK, Vermeire K, Hofkens A, De Bodt M, De Ridder D, Van de Heyning P (2011) Cochlear implantation as a durable tinnitus treatment in single-sided deafness. Cochlear Implants Int 12(Suppl 1):26–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD‑7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Távora-Vieira D, Marino R, Krishnaswamy J, Kuthbutheen J, Rajan GP (2013) Cochlear implantation for unilateral deafness with and without tinnitus: a case series. Laryngoscope 123(5):1251–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Usami SI, Kitoh R, Moteki H, Nishio SY, Kitano T, Kobayashi M, Shinagawa J, Yokota Y, Sugiyama K, Watanabe K (2017) Etiology of single-sided deafness and asymmetrical hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 137(sup565):S2–S7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D (2008) Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(9):645–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Van de Heyning P, Távora-Vieira D, Mertens G, Van Rompaey V, Rajan GP, Müller J, Hempel JM, Leander D, Polterauer D, Marx M, Usami SI, Kitoh R, Miyagawa M, Moteki H, Smilsky K, Baumgartner WD, Keintzel TG, Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A, Arndt S, Wesarg T, Zirn S, Baumann U, Weissgerber T, Rader T, Hagen R, Kurz A, Rak K, Stokroos R, George E, Polo R, Medina MDM, Henkin Y, Hilly O, Ulanovski D, Rajeswaran R, Kameswaran M, Di Gregorio MF, Zernotti ME (2016) Towards a Unified Testing Framework for Single-Sided Deafness Studies: A Consensus Paper. Audiol Neurootol 21(6):391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P (2009) Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 14(3):163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Häußler MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. M. Häußler S. Knopke, S. Dudka, S. Gräbel, M. C. Ketterer, R.-D. Battmer, A. Ernst and H. Olze declare that they have no competing interests.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Häußler, S.M., Knopke, S., Dudka, S. et al. Improvement in tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life and psychological comorbidities by cochlear implantation in single-sided deaf patients. HNO 68 (Suppl 1), 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-019-0705-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-019-0705-8

Keywords

Navigation