Teilergebnisse der Arbeit wurden als Poster mit dem Titel „Die offene operative Therapie des rupturierten Aneurysmas der Aorta abdominalis – Prädiktoren für das Überleben in den ersten 30 postoperativen Tagen“ Grotemeyer D, Strauß K, Balzer KM, Drabik A und Sandmann W auf dem 22. Jahreskongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie, 6.–9. September 2006, Mülheim an der Ruhr und als Vortrag mit dem Titel „Rupturiertes AAA: Pro offene Operationen“ Weis-Müller BT, Strauß K, Grotemeyer D und Sandmann W beim 15. Gefäßchirurgisches Symposium 2006, Hotel Renaissance Hamburg, 20.–22. Januar 2006, vorgestellt.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund und Zielsetzung
Das rupturierte Bauchaortenaneurysma (rBAA) stellt nach wie vor eine lebensbedrohliche vaskuläre Erkrankung dar und ist trotz verbesserter Diagnostik und perioperativem Patientenmanagement mit einer hohen Sterblichkeit behaftet. Ziel der Studie war es, perioperative Prädiktoren nach offen-konventioneller Behandlung für das Überleben bzw. Versterben an einer Bauchaortenruptur zu ermittelt.
Patientenkollektiv und Methoden
Es wurden retrospektiv die Krankheits- und Behandlungsverläufe von 67 Patienten untersucht, die zwischen Januar 1985 und Dezember 2004 als Notfall an einem rupturierten Aneurysma der Aorta abdominalis in unserer Klinik operiert wurden. Insgesamt wurden 72 präoperative, 47 intraoperative und 39 postoperative Variablen erfasst und analysiert.
Ergebnisse
Patienten mit einem rBAA und einer prolongierten Schockphase, welche auf dem Boden der Mitbeteiligung der Beckengefäße eine Y-Prothese implantiert bekamen, hatten die prognostisch schlechteste Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit. Eine Auswirkung des Alters sowie bestehender Begleiterkrankungen auf die Mortalität konnte nicht bewiesen werden. Bezüglich der Rupturlokalisation, peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal, konnte ebenfalls keine Einflussnahme auf den postoperativen Verlauf gezeigt werden. In dem hier untersuchen Patientenkollektiv betrug die kumulative Überlebensrate 30 Tage nach Operation 59,7% und für das 1. Jahr noch 43,3%.
Fazit
Anhand dieser Studie konnte gezeigt werden, dass weder ein fortgeschrittenes Lebensalter noch bestehende Begleiterkrankungen einen Einfluss auf die Mortalität bei Patienten mit einem rBAA haben. Dem entsprechend sollte bei Patienten mit rBAA keine aufwändige Selektion nach Vorerkrankungen erfolgen, sondern u. E. eine schnellstmögliche konventionell operativ chirurgische Ausschaltung durchgeführt werden, um somit eine Überlebenschance zu erreichen.
Abstract
Objectives
Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) still represent a life-threatening vascular disease, with high mortality despite improved diagnostic tools and perioperative patient management. The aim of this study was to reveal predictors of perioperative mortality and survival after open (conventional) rAAA repair.
Patients and Methods
We analyzed data from our department containing 67 patient histories and clinical notes which were collected between January 1984 and December 2004. The study patients underwent emergent surgery for rAAA. In these cases we defined 72 preoperative, 47 intraoperative, and 39 postoperative variables for further analysis.
Results
Our results indicate that the worst survival prognosis could be defined in patients with rAAA and aneurysmatic inclusion of the iliac arteries with concomitant prolonged shock who received an aorto-iliac bypass. For these patients we calculated a cumulative 30-day survival rate of 59.7% and 1-year survival of 43.3%. An influence of age and comorbidity on the mortality rate could not be proven. Furthermore the conclusion cannot be drawn that postoperative course was influenced by intra- vs retroperitoneal rupture localization.
Conclusion
This study provides evidence that neither old patient age nor comorbidities influence the mortality of patients suffering from rAAA, for whom time-consuming case selection according to previous morbidities should therefore be omitted. Instead we recommend conventional surgical repair as soon as possible to maximize the chances of survival.
Literatur
Adam DJ, Mohan IV, Stuart WP et al. (1999) Community and hospital outcome from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm within the catchment area of a regional vascular surgical service. J Vasc Surg 30: 922–928
Alonso-Perez M, Segura RJ, Sanchez J et al. (2001) Factors increasing the mortality rate for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 15: 601–607
Barry MC, Merriman B, Wiley M et al. (1997) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm – can treatment costs and outcomes be predicted by using clinical or physiological parameters? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 14: 487–491
Blankensteijn JD (2000) Mortality and morbidity rates after conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Semin Interv Cardiol 5: 7–13
Brandt M, Walluscheck KP, Jahnke T et al. (2005) Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: feasibility and impact on early outcome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16: 1309–1312
Cao P, Verzini F, Parlani G et al. (2004) Clinical effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm endografting: 7-year concurrent comparison with open repair. J Vasc Surg 40: 841–848
Cervantes J (2003) Reflections on the 50th anniversary of the first abdominal aortic aneurysm resection. World J Surg 27: 246–248
Dillavou ED, Muluk SC, Makaroun MS (2006) A decade of change in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States: have we improved outcomes equally between men and women? J Vasc Surg 43: 230–238
Dubost C, Allery M, Oeconomos N (1952) Resection of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: reestablishment of the continuity by a perserved human arterial graft, with results after five months. Arch Surg 64: 405–408
Dueck AD, Kucey DS, Johnston KW et al. (2004) Long-term survival and temporal trends in patient and surgeon factors after elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg 39: 1261–1267
Gerassimidis TS, Papazoglou KO, Kamparoudis AG et al. (2005) Endovascular management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: 6-year experience from a Greek center. J Vasc Surg 42: 615–623; discussion 623
Glickman MH, Julian CC, Kimmins S, Evans WE (1982) Aortic aneurysm: to tube or not to tube. Surgery 91: 603–605
Halpern VJ, Kline RG, D’Angelo AJ, Cohen JR (1997) Factors that affect the survival rate of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 26: 939–945; discussion 945–938
Hans SS, Huang RR (2003) Results of 101 ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs from a single surgical practice. Arch Surg 138: 898–901
Harris LM, Faggioli GL, Fiedler R et al. (1991) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: factors affecting mortality rates. J Vasc Surg 14: 812–818; discussion 819–820
Hejazi SN (2001) Gefäßchirurgie – ein historischer Überblick. Hessisches Ärzteblatt 8: 379–381
Hertzer NR, Mascha EJ, Karafa MT et al. (2002) Open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the Cleveland Clinic experience from 1989 to 1998. J Vasc Surg 35: 1145–1154
Hinchliffe RJ, Bruijstens L, MacSweeney ST, Braithwaite BD (2006) A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm – results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32: 506–513; discussion 514–505
Ingoldby CJ, Wujanto R, Mitchell JE (1986) Impact of vascular surgery on community mortality from ruptured aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 73: 551–553
Larzon T, Lindgren R, Norgren L (2005) Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a shift of the paradigm? J Endovasc Ther 12: 548–555
Marty-Ane CH, Alric P, Picot MC et al. (1995) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of intraoperative management on surgical outcome. J Vasc Surg 22: 780–786
May J, White GH, Stephen MS, Harris JP (2004) Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm: concurrent comparison of outcome of those occurring after endovascular repair versus those occurring without previous treatment in an 11-year single-center experience. J Vasc Surg 40: 860–866
Mealy K, Salman A (1988) The true incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Surg 2: 405–408
Mehta M, Darling RC 3rd, Roddy SP et al. (2005) Factors associated with abdominal compartment syndrome complicating endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 42: 1047–1051
Noel AA, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ Jr et al. (2001) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: the excessive mortality rate of conventional repair. J Vasc Surg 34: 41–46
Ohki T, Veith FJ, Sanchez LA et al. (1999) Endovascular graft repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. J Am Coll Surg 189: 102–112; discussion 112–103
Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD (1991) Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 5: 491–499
Peppelenbosch N, Cuypers PW, Vahl AC et al. (2005) Emergency endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and the risk of spinal cord ischemia. J Vasc Surg 42: 608–614
Pfeiffer T, Reiher L, Grabitz K, Sandmann W (2000) [Results of conventional surgical therapy of abdominal aortic aneurysms since the beginning of the „endovascular era“]. Chirurg 71: 72–79
Pfeiffer T, Sandmann W (2003) Infarenales Aortenaneurysma. Diagnostik und Therapie. Chirurg 74: 482–496; quiz 496–487
Provan JL, Falkov JA, Ameli FM (1988) Is ‚tube‘ prosthetic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm followed by postoperative dilatation of the common iliac arteries? In: 36th Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Cardiovascular Surgery. Chicago
Reichart M, Geelkerken RH, Huisman AB et al. (2003) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular repair is feasible in 40% of patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26: 479–486
Richardson JD, Main KA (1991) Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A statewide experience. Arch Surg 126: 614–616
Rigberg DA, Zingmond DS, McGory ML et al. (2006) Age stratified, perioperative, and one-year mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a statewide experience. J Vasc Surg 43: 224–229
Ritter R, Grabitz K, Godehardt E, Sandmann W (1997) Langzeitergebnisse nach Operation eines Bauchaortenaneurysmas im Alter über 80 Jahre. Gefässchirurgie 2: 5–10
Souza VC, Strachan DP (2005) Relationship between travel time to the nearest hospital and survival from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: record linkage study. J Public Health (Oxf) 27: 165–170
Stuhmeier KD, Mainzer B, van Poppelen R et al. (1987) Abdominal aortic aneurysm – is a conservative attitude still justified? Experiences with 56 emergency and 128 elective surgical patients from the anesthesiological and vascular surgery viewpoints]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 112: 1930–1935
Tambyraja AL, Murie JA, Chalmers RT (2005) Outcome and survival of patients aged 65 years and younger after abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. World J Surg 29: 1245–1247
Vaddineni SK, Russo GC, Patterson MA et al. (2005) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a retrospective assessment of open versus endovascular repair. Ann Vasc Surg 19: 782–786
van Dongen HP, Leusink JA, Moll FL et al. (1998) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: factors influencing postoperative mortality and long-term survival. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 15: 62–66
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grotemeyer, D., Strauß, K., Weis-Müller, B. et al. Rupturiertes Bauchaortenaneurysma. Chirurg 79, 745–752 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-008-1524-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-008-1524-8