Skip to main content
Log in

Die Serumproteinbindung von Fentanyl

Einfluß der postoperativen Akut-Phase-Reaktion mit Anstieg von saurem α1-Glykoprotein und methodische Probleme bei der Bestimmung mittels Gleichgewichtsdialyse

Serum protein binding of fentanyl: influence of postoperative acute phase reaction with elevated concentrations of α1-acid glycoprotein and possible errors in determination by equilibrium dialysis

  • ORIGINALIEN
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Zahlreiche basische Arzneimittel werden an das Akut-Phase-Protein saures α 1 -Glykoprotein (sα 1 GP) gebunden. Für Fentanyl (F) liegen dazu widersprüchliche Ergebnisse vor. Bei 13 Patienten mit Baucheingriffen wurde deshalb die postoperative Akut-Phase-Reaktion mit den entsprechenden Veränderungen der Serumproteine bis zum 3. postoperativen Tag verfolgt und untersucht, ob der Anstieg von sα 1 GP von einem Anstieg der Serumproteinbinderate (SPB) von F begleitet wird. Die SPB wurde mittels Gleichgewichtsdialyse bestimmt. Dabei auftretende methodische Probleme wurden im zweiten Teil der Studie untersucht. Während die Serumkonzentration von sα 1 GP postoperativ anstieg, blieb die SPB von F unverändert, tendenziell fiel sie geringfügig. Die Konzentrationen von Albumin, Gesamteiweiß und Apolipoprotein B nahmen tendenziell, z.T. sogar signifikant ab. Für diese drei Eiweißfraktionen konnte auch eine positive Korrelation mit der SPB nachgewiesen werden. Damit ergeben sich weitere Hinweise darauf, daß Albumin, Gesamteiweiß und Apolipoprotein B für die Proteinbindung von F von Bedeutung sind. Eine Bindung an sα 1 -GP ist zwar grundsätzlich denkbar, quantitativ ist sie aber im Vergleich zu anderen basischen Arzneimitteln nur von untergeordneter Bedeutung. Während der Gleichgewichtsdialyse kommt es zu Volumenverschiebungen vom Pufferkompartiment zum Serumkompartiment und zu Veränderungen des pH-Werts, die bei der Berechnung der Proteinbinderate und der Auswahl des Puffers zu berücksichtigen sind.

Abstract

Numerous basic drugs are extensively bound to α1-acid glycoprotein. Fentanyl, with a pKa value of 8.43, is also a basic drug. Protein binding studies have yielded contradictory results concerning binding of fentanyl to α1-acid glycoprotein. In this study we investigated time courses of serum protein concentrations and serum protein binding of fentanyl during postoperative acute phase reaction, assuming that an increase of α1-acid glycoprotein is accompanied by an increase of serum protein binding, if fentanyl is extensively bound to α1-acid glycoprotein. Fentanyl protein binding measurements using equilibrium dialysis can be affected by volume shifts and pH changes. Therefore, volume shifts from buffer to serum and the influence of various phosphate buffers on increasing pH due to loss of CO2 were also evaluated. Methods. Thirteen patients with no history of renal or hepatic disease undergoing an operation with a significant acute phase reaction were studied. Preoperatively and on the first 3 postoperative days serum concentrations of α1-acid glycoprotein, albumin, total protein and apolipoprotein A and B were determined by rocket immunoeolectrophoresis, biuret method and laser nephelometry, respectively. Corresponding serum protein binding of fentanyl was measured by adding 40 ng of fentanyl to 1 ml serum followed by equilibrium dialysis at 37° C for 4 h. A 0.167 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.27), which gave a final pH of 7.40, was used. Volume shifts from buffer to serum were measured. Fentanyl concentration in serum before dialysis (FS) was determined by gas chromatography, and fentanyl concentration in buffer after dialysis (FB) was determined by radioimmunoassay. Serum protein binding (SPB) was calculated by the formula:

where c is a correction factor. Ten randomly selected patient sera were dialyzed against four phosphate buffers of different pH values and molarities, and the serum pH at the end of equilibrium dialysis was measured. Results. Postoperatively, the serum concentration of α1-acid glycoprotein rose to 151% of the control value. In contrast, serum protein binding of fentanyl did not change significantly, with a slight decrease to 96% of control value. There was a significant decrease in serum concentrations of albumin (3rd postoperative day), total protein (2nd postoperative day) and apolipoprotein B (1st–3rd postoperative day) to 85%, 90% and 75% of control values, respectively. Changes in apolipoprotein A concentration were not significant. Protein binding of fentanyl did not correlate with α1-acid glycoprotein and apolipoprotein A, but there was a positive linear relationship between protein binding of fentanyl and albumin, total protein and apolipoprotein B. At the end of equilibrium dialysis the mean volumes of the serum and buffer compartments were 1114±72 and 834±68 μl, respectively. The two phosphate buffers, with pH 7.30 (0.15 M) and pH 7.27 (0.167 M), gave final serum pH of 7.42 and 7.40, respectively. Conclusions. Present findings suggest that in contrast to other basic drugs, fentanyl binding to α1-acid glycoprotein is of minor importance. In agreement with the findings of former studies, protein binding of fentanyl depended on albumin, total protein and apolipoprotein B concentrations. Due to unspecific binding of fentanyl by hydrophobic interactions, a major role of albumin, which amounts to about 60% of total protein, seems to be evident. Determining fentanyl protein binding by equilibrium dialysis, volume shifts must be taken into account if calculation is based on fentanyl concentrations in plasma (serum) and buffer after dialysis, and an appropriate buffer must be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Eingegangen am 18. September 1995 Angenommen am 27. November 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiesner, G., Taeger, K. & Peter, K. Die Serumproteinbindung von Fentanyl . Anaesthesist 45, 323–329 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050267

Navigation