Summary
There are two kinds of justifications for advance directives. The first is that they extend patient autonomy into the future, allowing individuals to control or at least influence their care after they have lost the capacity to make decisions. The second is that they help physicians and family members make emotionally stressful decisions in difficult circumstances. Whether directives are written or unwritten is of secondary importance. The primary concern is that they are based on an adequate understanding of medical options. Two cases illustrate the relative importance of these features of advance directives.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Davidson KW, et al (1989) Physicians’ attitudes on advance directives. Journal of the American Medical Association 262: 2415–2419
King NMP (1996) Making sense of advance directives. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hackler, C. Communication through advance directives. Wien Klin Wochenschr 116, 427–430 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03040930
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03040930