Skip to main content
Log in

Primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection following orchiectomy for testicular germ cell tumors: a single-surgeon experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives were to evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node (R-RPLND) dissection for testicular germ cell tumors. A retrospective analysis was performed on all primary R-RPLND cases performed by a single surgeon, who performs both open and R-RPLND at a high-volume academic institution, between August 2013 and August 2019. Data on patient demographics, operative techniques, perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics were obtained. 28 men were identified who underwent primary R-RPLND. The majority of patients (N = 21, 75%) had clinical stage I disease, and a bilateral template was more commonly performed than either single side alone (N = 13, 46%). Of note, two cases involving clinical stage II disease were converted electively from robotic to open procedures at the discretion of the surgeon. R-RPLND patients experienced no intraoperative complications. The median follow-up time was 8 months (interquartile range 4–29 months). One (4%) patient developed a disease recurrence at 10 months after R-RPLND. Conclusion: primary R-RPLND is a safe and efficacious procedure for carefully selected men with stage I and II non-seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis. Long-term data are needed to evaluate the comparative oncologic efficacy with open surgery and the notably high rate of chylous ascites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer of the testis. Cancer Stat Facts. In: SEER. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/testis.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2019

  2. Diagnosis and treatment of early stage testicular cancer: AUA Guideline (2019) American Urological Association. https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/testicular-cancer-guideline. Accessed 21 Oct 2019

  3. Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N et al (2015) Testicular cancer, Version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13:772–799. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwen ZR, Gupta M, Pierorazio PM (2018) A review of outcomes and technique for the robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Adv Urol 2018:2146080. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2146080

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Werntz R, Pearce S, Eggener S (2018) Indications, evolving technique, and early outcomes with robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Curr Opin Urol 28:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Subramanian VS, Nguyen CT, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA (2010) Complications of open primary and post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 28:504–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.10.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davol P, Sumfest J, Rukstalis D (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology 67:199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearce SM, Golan S, Gorin MA et al (2017) Safety and early oncologic effectiveness of primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer. Eur Urol 71:476–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Calaway AC, Einhorn LH, Masterson TA et al (2019) Adverse surgical outcomes associated with robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection among patients with testicular cancer. Eur Urol 76:607–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.05.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rocco NR, Stroup SP, Abdul-Muhsin HM et al (2019) Primary robotic RLPND for nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: a two-center analysis of intermediate oncologic and safety outcomes. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02900-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nayan M, Jewett MAS, Sweet J et al (2015) Lymph node yield in primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminoma germ cell tumors. J Urol 194:386–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris KT, Gorin MA, Ball MW et al (2015) A comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. BJU Intern 116:920–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tselos A, Moris D, Tsilimigras DI et al (2018) Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in testicular cancer treatment: a systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28:682–689. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams SB, McDermott DW, Winston D et al (2010) Morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: contemporary perioperative data. BJU Int 105:918–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08888.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cary C, Foster RS, Masterson TA (2019) Complications of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urol Clin North Am 46:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2019.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baniel J, Foster RS, Rowland RG et al (1994) Complications of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol 152:424–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32754-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew D. Supron.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Andrew Supron, Joseph Cheaib, Michael Biles, Zeyad Schwen, Mohamad Allaf, and Phillip Pierorazio declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. A waiver of informed consent was obtained from our institutional review board (IRB) for this study.

Human and animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Supron, A.D., Cheaib, J.G., Biles, M.J. et al. Primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection following orchiectomy for testicular germ cell tumors: a single-surgeon experience. J Robotic Surg 15, 309–313 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01107-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01107-1

Keywords

Navigation