Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pelvic floor ultrasound in prolapse: what’s in it for the surgeon?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pelvic reconstructive surgeons have suspected for over a century that childbirth-related trauma plays a major role in the aetiology of female pelvic organ prolapse. Modern imaging has recently allowed us to define and reliably diagnose some of this trauma. As a result, imaging is becoming increasingly important, since it allows us to identify patients at high risk of recurrence, and to define underlying problems rather than just surface anatomy. Ultrasound is the most appropriate form of imaging in urogynecology for reasons of cost, access and performance, and due to the fact that it provides information in real time. I will outline the main uses of this technology in pelvic reconstructive surgery and focus on areas in which the benefit to patients and clinicians is most evident. I will also try and give a perspective for the next 5 years, to consider how imaging may transform the way we deal with pelvic floor disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schubert E (1929) Topographie des Uterus und der Harnblase im Roentgenprofilbild. Zentralbl Gynäkol 53:1182–1193

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffcoate TNA, Roberts H (1952) Observations on stress incontinence of urine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 64:721–738

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Richter K (1987) Die Bedeutung der radiologischen Beckenviszerographie fuer eine rationelle Therapie der weiblichen Stressinkontinenz. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 47:509–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kohorn EI, Scioscia AL, Jeanty P, Hobbins JC (1986) Ultrasound cystourethrography by perineal scanning for the assessment of female stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 68:269–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grischke EM, Dietz HP, Jeanty P, Schmidt W (1986) A new study method: the perineal scan in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultraschall Med 7:154–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinn MJ, Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Smith PJ (1988) Transvaginal endosonography: a new method to study the anatomy of the lower urinary tract in urinary stress incontinence. Br J Urol 62:414–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dohke M, Mitchell DG, Vasavada SP (2001) Fast magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse. Tech Urol 7:133–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz HP, Wilson PD (1999) The influence of bladder volume on the position and mobility of the urethrovesical junction. Int Urogynecol J 10:3–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reich A, Kohorst F, Kreienberg R, Flock F (2010) Influence of bladder volume on pelvic organ prolapse quantification results. Gynecol Obstet Investig 70:82–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oerno A, Dietz H (2007) Levator co-activation is a significant confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva maneuver. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:346–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Velde J, Laan E, Everaerd W (2001) Vaginismus, a component of a general defensive reaction. an investigation of pelvic floor muscle activity during exposure to emotion-inducing film excerpts in women with and without vaginismus. Int Urogynecol J 12:328–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Orejuela F, Shek K, Dietz H (2010) The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning. Int Urogynecol J 21:S365–S367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz H, Lanzarone V (2005) Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 106:707–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kearney R, Miller J, Ashton-Miller J, Delancey J (2006) Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 107:144–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DeLancey J, Morgan D, Fenner D, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller J et al (2007) Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 109:295–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2006) The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 113:225–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dietz H, Simpson J (2008) Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 115:979–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steensma A, Konstantinovic ML, Burger C, De Ridder D, Timmermann D, Deprest J (2010) Prevalence of major levator abnormalities in symptomatic patients with an underactive pelvic floor contraction. Int Urogynecol J 21:861–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kearney R, Miller JM, Delancey JO (2006) (2006) Interrater reliability and physical examination of the pubovisceral portion of the levator ani muscle, validity comparisons using MR imaging. Neurourol Urodyn 25:50–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dietz HP, Shek KL (2008) Validity and reproducibility of the digital detection of levator trauma. Int Urogynecol J 19:1097–1101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gainey HL (1943) Post-partum observation of pelvic tissue damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 46:457–466

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dietz H, De Leon J, Shek K (2008) Ballooning of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:676–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Franco A, Shek K, Kirby A, Fynes M, Dietz H (2009) Avulsion injury and levator hiatal ballooning: two independent risk factors for prolapse? Int Urogynecol J 20(2):169–170

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dietz H, Shek K, Clarke B (2005) Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:580–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang J, Yang S, Huang W (2006) Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus in nulliparous Chinese women. Ultrsound Obstet Gynecol 26:710–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kruger J, Heap X, Murphy B, Dietz H (2008) Pelvic floor function in nulliparous women using 3-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 111:631–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoff Braekken I, Majida M, Ellstrom Engh M, Dietz HP, Umek W, Bo K (2008) Test- retest and intra-observer repeatability of two-, three- and four-dimensional perineal ultrasound of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function. Int Urogynecol J 19:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kruger J, Heap S, Murphy B, Dietz H (2010) How best to measure the levator hiatus: evidence for the non-Euclidean nature of the ‘plane of minimal dimensions’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:755–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong V, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2009) A simplified method for the determination of levator hiatal dimensions. Int Urogynecol J 20:S145–S146

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dietz H (2007) Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bernardo M, Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Does partial avulsion of the levator ani matter for symptoms or signs of pelvic floor dysfunction? Int Urogynecol J 21:S100–S101

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dietz HP, Chantarasorn V, Shek KL (2010) Levator avulsion is a risk factor for cystocele recurrence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:76–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Model A, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Levator defects are associated with prolapse after pelvic floor surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 153:220–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kashihara H, Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Can we identify the limits of the puborectalis muscle on tomographic translabial ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J 21:S370–S372

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA (1991) Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 179:25–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bo K, Larson S, Oseid S, Kvarstein B, Hagen R, Jorgensen J (1988) Knowledge about and ability to do correct pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urinary stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 7:261–262

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dietz HP, Wilson PD, Clarke B (2001) The use of perineal ultrasound to quantify levator activity and teach pelvic floor muscle exercises. Int Urogynecol J 12:166–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Eisenberg V, Chantarasorn V, Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Does levator ani injury affect cystocele type? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:618–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Green TH (1968) The problem of urinary stress incontinence in the female: an appraisal of its current status. Obstet Gynecol Surv 23:603–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chantarasorn V, Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Diagnosis of cystocele type by POP-Q and pelvic floor ultrasound. ICS/IUGA Joint Scientific Meeting. Toronto, In

    Google Scholar 

  41. Giannitsas K, Athanasopoulos A (2010) Femle urethral diverticula: from pathogenesis to management. An update. Exp Rev Obstet Gynecol 5:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dietz HP (2011) Pelvic floor imaging in incontinence: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1402-7

    Google Scholar 

  43. Feiner B, Jelovsek J, Maher C (2009) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 116:15–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Velemir L, Amblard J, Fatton B, Savary D, Jacquetin B (2010) Transvaginal mesh repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse: a clinical and ultrasonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(4):474–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Svabik K, Martan A, Masata J, Elhaddad R (2009) Vaginal mesh shrinking- ultrasound assessment and quantification. Int Urogynecol J 2009:S166

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dietz H, Erdmann M, Shek K (2011) Mesh contraction: myth or reality? Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(2):173.e1–173.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shek K, Rane A, Goh J, Dietz H (2008) Perigee versus anterior prolift in the treatment of cystocele. Int Urogynecol J 19(S1):S88

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wong V, Shek K, Goh J, Rane A, Dietz H (2011) Should mesh be used for cystocele repair? Long-term outcomes of a case- control series, IUGA, Lisbon, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dietz H, Shek C, Rane A (2006) Perigee transobturator mesh implant for the repair of large and recurrent cystocele. Int Urogynecol J 17:S139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Shek K, Rane A, Goh J, Dietz H (2009) Stress urinary incontinence after transobturator mesh for cystocele repair. Int Urogynecol J 20:421–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2005) Posterior compartment prolapse on two-dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dietz HP, Korda A (2005) Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele? Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 45:505–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rodrigo N, Shek K, Dietz H (2011) Rectal intussusception is associated with abnormal levator structure and morphometry. Tech Coloproctol 15(1):39–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Perniola G, Shek K, Chong C, Chew S, Cartmill J, Dietz H (2008) Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:567–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Steensma AB, Oom DMJ, Burger C, Schouten W (2010) Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound. Colorectal Dis 12:533–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP (2004) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:60–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zbar A, Beer-Gabel M (2008) Dynamic transperineal ultrasonography. In: Zbar A, Pescatori M, Regadas F, Murad Regadas S (eds) Imaging atlas of the pelvic floor and anorectal diseases. Springer Italia, Milan, pp 189–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S (2003) The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 101:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Intrapartum risk factors of levator trauma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 17:1485–1492

    Google Scholar 

  60. Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner-Celnikier D et al (2009) Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:91.e91–91.e97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA (2004) Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 103:31–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dietz H, Gillespie A, Phadke P (2007) Avulsion of the pubovisceral muscle associated with large vaginal tear after normal vaginal delivery at term. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 47:341–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wallner C, Wallace C, Maas C, Lange M, Lahaye M, Moayeri N et al (2009) A high resolution 3D study of the female pelvis reveals important anatomical and pathological details of the pelvic floor. Neurourol Urodyn 28:668–670

    Google Scholar 

  64. Abdool Z, Shek K, Dietz H (2009) The effect of levator avulsion on hiatal dimensions and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:89.e81–89.e85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dietz H, Shek K, Chantarasorn V, Langer S (2011) Do women notice the effect of childbirth-related pelvic floor trauma? IUGA, Lisbon, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  66. Moegni F, Shek K, Dietz H (2010) Diagnosis of levator avulsion injury: a comparison of three methods. Int Urogynecol J 21:S215–S216

    Google Scholar 

  67. Dietz HP, Shek K (2009) Tomographic ultrasound of the pelvic flooor: which levels matter most? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:698–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Adi Suroso T, Shek K, Dietz H (2011) Tomographic imaging of the pelvic floor in nulliparous women: limits of normality. IUGA, Lisbon, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  69. Falkert A, Endress E, Ma W, Seelbach-Göbel B (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound of the pelvic floor 2 days after first delivery: influence of constitutional and obstetric factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:583–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Shek K, Dietz H (2011) Does levator trauma heal? IUGA, Lisbon, In press

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tincello DG (2009) The use of synthetic meshes in vaginal prolapse surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 116:1–2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Shobeiri S, Chimpiri A, Allen AC, Nihira M, Quiroz LH (2009) Surgical reconstitution of a unilaterally avulsed symptomatic puborectalis muscle using autologous fascia lata. Obstet Gynecol 114:480–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Dietz H, Bhalla R, Chantarasorn V, Shek K (2011) Avulsion of the puborectalis muscle causes asymmetry of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. doi:10.1002/uog.8969

    Google Scholar 

  74. Dietz HP, Shek KL, Korda A (2011) Can levator avulsion be corrected surgically? Neurourol Urodyn; in print

  75. Brieger GM, Korda AR, Houghton CR (1996) Abdomino perineal repair of pulsion enterocele. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 22:151–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Andrew B, Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Dietz HP (2011) Enlargement of the levator hiatus in female pelvic organ prolapse: cause or effect? Neurourol Urodyn; in print

  77. Dietz HP, Shek KL, Korda A (2011) Can ballooning of the levator hiatus be corrected surgically? Abstract, ICS Glasgow

  78. Dietz HP (2010) The role of two- and three-dimensional dynamic ultrasonography in pelvic organ prolapse. J Min Invas Gynecol 17:282–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. De Lee J (1938) The principles and practice of obstetrics, 7th edn. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  80. Dietz HP (2011) Pelvic floor ultrasound. In: Fleischer AC, Toy EC, Wesley L, Manning FA, Romero R (eds) sonography in obstetrics and gynaecology: principles and practice, 7th edn. Mc Graw Hill, New York

  81. Dietz HP (2007) Pelvic floor ultrasound. Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine Bulletin 10:17–23

  82. Dietz HP, Hoyte L, Steensma A (2007) Pelvic floor ultrasound. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The author has received honoraria as a speaker from GE Medical, Astellas and AMS and has in the past acted as consultant for CCS, AMS and Materna Inc. He has also received equipment loans from GE, Toshiba and Bruel and Kjaer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Peter Dietz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, H.P. Pelvic floor ultrasound in prolapse: what’s in it for the surgeon?. Int Urogynecol J 22, 1221–1232 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1459-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1459-3

Keywords

Navigation