Skip to main content
Log in

Human Liberation

Removing Biological and Psychological Barriers to Freedom

  • Articles
  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the author argues that there are psychological and biological constraints on our moral behaviour, rational decision-making and capacities to love. For example, low oxytocin levels can constrain our willingness to cooperate with others, and our capacity to maintain long-term loving relationships. There is also evidence that increasing iodine intake can improve a person’s general intelligence, while drugs such as Modafinil can enhance cognitive performance. Savulescu argues that we have a moral obligation to remove those constraints, and that we ought to accept these methods of improving our moral behaviour, decision-making, and cognitive functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Materials in This Article Are Drawn from the Following Texts

  • Savulescu, J. 2006. ‘Genetic interventions and the ethics of enhancement of human beings’. In The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, edited by Steinbock, B. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 516–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J. 2009. ‘Genetic enhancement’. In A Companion to Bioethics. 2nd ed. Edited by Kuhse, H.; Singer, P. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J; Kahane, G. 2009. ‘The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life’. Bioethics 23(5): 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J. 2001. ‘Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children’. Bioethics 15(5): 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References

  • American Psyciatric Association. 1987. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-III-R. 3rd ed., rev. Washington, D.C., American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. et al. 1995. The Literacy Proficiencies of GED Examinees: Results From the GED-NALS Comparison Study, Washington, DC: American Council on Education and Educational Testing. Quoted

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. 1997. ‘Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life’. Intelligence 24(1): 79–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A; McClay, J; Moffitt, T; Mill, J; Martin, J; Craig, I; Taylor, A; Poulton, R. 2002. ‘Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children’. Science 297: 851–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J; Herbert, J. 2008. ‘Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 6167–6172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L 1997. ‘Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life‘. Intelligence 24(1): 79–132. Accessed 3 July 2009. Available from

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. 1998. ‘The general intelligence factor’. Scientific American Presents 9(4): 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I S; Jungeblut, A; Jenkins, L; Kolstad, A. 1993. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, B. 2008. ‘Poll results: Look who’s doping’. Nature 452: 674–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W; Shoda, Y; Peake, P. 1988. ‘The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification’. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 54(4): 687–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J. 2006. ‘Genetic interventions and the ethics of enhancement of human beings’. In The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, edited by Steinbock, B. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.516–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J; Sandberg, A. 2007. ‘The neuroenhancement of love and marriage: The chemicals between us’. Neuroethics 1: 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walum, H; Westberg, L; Henningson, S; Neiderhiser, J; Reiss, D; Ganiban, J; Spotts, E; Pedersen, N; Eriksson, E; Lichtenstein, P 2008. ‘Genetic variations in the vasopressing receptior la gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair bonding behaviour in humans.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 105(37): 153–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Savulescu, J. Human Liberation. Monash Bioethics Review 29, 1–18 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351320

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351320

Keywords

Navigation