Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rigid and flexible control of eating behavior and their relationship to dieting status

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined whether or not rigid and flexible dimensions of restraint could differentiate between women who self-identified as dieting to lose weight versus those who self-identified as dieting to maintain weight. Four hundred thirty-three women responded to dichotomous questions regarding their dieting status and completed the Eating Inventory and Rigid and Flexible Control Scales (RC16 and FC12, respectively). Logistic regressions were conducted using dieting status as the dependent variable and RC16 scores, FC12 scores, susceptibility to overeating, and BMI as the independent variables. Scores on the RC16 and BMI correctly identified 73.6% of women as dieting to lose weight; scores on the RC16 and FC12 correctly identified 52.6% of women as dieting to maintain weight. Susceptibility to overeating was unrelated to dieting status. Results indicate that rigid control over eating is strongly related to dieting to lose weight and that both rigid and flexible control are related to dieting to maintain weight. This latter relationship is in need of further exploration. Results of this study support the contention that restraint and dieting are related, however, they are not equivalent constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Herman C.P., Polivy J.: A boundary model for the regulation of eating. In: Stunkard A.J., Stellar E. (Eds.), Eating and its disorders. New York, Raven Press, 1984, pp. 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herman C.P., Polivy J.: Restrained eating. In: Stunkard A.J. (Ed.), Obesity. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1980, pp. 208–225.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heatherton T.F., Herman C.P., Polivy J., King G.A., McGree S.T.: The (Mis)measurement of restraint: An analysis of conceptual and psychometric issues. J. Abnorm. Psychol., 97, 19–28, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowe M.R.: The effects of dieting on eating behavior: A three-factor model. Psychol. Bull., 114, 100–121, 1993. 5_Lehrke S., Hubel R., Laessle R.G.: Essverhalten und psychosoziale Belastung von Personen mit hoher und niedriger wahrgenommener Diäthäufigkeit. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 13, 21–28, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dritschel B., Cooper P.J., Charnock D.: A problematic counter-regulation experiment: Implications for the link between dietary restraint and overeating. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 13, 297–304, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe M.R., Whitlow J.W., Bellwoar V.: Eating regulation: The role of restraint, dieting, and weight. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 10, 461–471, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowe M.R., Timko C.A.: What a difference a diet makes: Toward an understanding of differences between restrained dieters and restrained nondieters. Eat. Behav., 5, 199–208, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stice E., Fisher M., Lowe M.R.: Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of acute dietary restraint? Unobtrusive data suggest not. Psychol. Assess., 16, 51–59, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Westenhoefer J.: Dietary restraint and disinhibition: Is restraint a homogeneous construct? Appetite, 16, 45–55, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Westenhoefer J., Broeckmann P., Munch A., Pudel V.: Cognitive control of eating behavior and the disinhibi-tion effect. Appetite, 23, 27–41, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Westenhoefer J., Stunkard A.J., Pudel V.: Validation of the flexible and rigid control dimensions of dietary restraint. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 26, 53–64, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stunkard A.J., Messick S.: The three factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. J. Psychosom. Res., 29, 71–81, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Westenhoefer J.: Gezügeltes Essen und Störbarkeit des Eßverhaltens (2. Auflage). Göttingen, Verlag für Psychologie, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lowe M.R.: Putting restrained and unrestrained non dieters on short-term diets: Effects on eating. Addict. Behav., 16, 349–356, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe M.R.: Restrained eating and dieting: Replication of their divergent effects on eating regulation. Appetite, 25, 115–118, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Putterman E., Linden W.: Appearance versus health: Does the reason for dieting affect dieting behavior? J. Behav. Med., 27, 185–196, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. French S.A., Jeffery R.W., Wing R.A.: Food intake and physical activity: A comparison of three measures of dieting. Addict. Behav., 19, 401–409, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ogden J.: The measurement of restraint: Confounding success and failure? Int. J. Eat. Disord., 13, 69–76, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Counseling and Student Development, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

    C. A. Timko Ph.D

  2. Department of Counseling & Psychological Services, West Chester University, West Chester, PA, USA

    J. Perone

Authors
  1. C. A. Timko Ph.D
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Perone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. A. Timko Ph.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timko, C.A., Perone, J. Rigid and flexible control of eating behavior and their relationship to dieting status. Eat Weight Disord 11, e90–e95 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327564

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327564

Keywords

Search

Navigation