Skip to main content
Log in

Thin is “in” and stout is “out”: What animated cartoons tell viewers about body weight

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relying upon a content analysis of one specific type of medium to which young people are exposed beginning at an early age, on a regular basis, and for many years (i.e., animated cartoons), the present study examines what types of messages are provided about being underweight, overweight and normal weight. This research examines the following issues: (1) How prevalent is weight-related content in animated cartoons? (2) Has this prevalence changed over time? (3) What “types” of characteristics tend to be associated with being thinner-than-normal or heavier-than normal? Results indicate that the prevalence of both underweight and overweight characters has changed dramatically over the course of the past several decades. These relationships are both curvilinear in nature, but in recent decades have demonstrated a significant increase in the proportion of all cartoons showing characters that are underweight and a simultaneous decrease in the prevalence of characters that are overweight. Many variables were found to differ based on cartoon characters’ body weight, including gender, age, intelligence, physical attractiveness, emotional states experienced, prosocial behaviors, antisocial behaviors, and overall goodness/badness. Whenever differences were found, the overriding tendency was for cartoons to provide positive messages about being thin and negative messages about being overweight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malkin A.R., Wornian K., Chrisler J.C.: Women and weight: Gendered messages on magazine covers. Sex Roles, 40, 647–655, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nemeroff C.J., Stein R.I., Diehl N.S., Smilack K.M.: From the Cleavers to the Clintons: Role choices and body orientation as reflected in magazine article content. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 16, 167–176, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Petrie T.A., Austin L.J., Cowley B.J., Helmcamp A., et al.: Sociocultural expectations of attractiveness for males. Sex Roles, 35, 581–602, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spitzer B.L., Henderson K.A., Zivian M.T.: Gender differences in population versus media body sizes: A comparison over four decades. Sex Roles, 40, 545–565, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stice E.: Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull., 128, 825–848, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fouts G., Vaughan K.: Television situation comedies: Male weight, negative references, and audience reactions. Sex Roles, 46, 439–442, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fouts G., Burggraf K.: Television situation comedies: Female weight, male negative comments, and audience reactions. Sex Roles, 42, 925–932, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pratt C.A., Pratt C.B., Montague S.N., Salazar J.C., Graves M.C.: Do popular magazines promote weightcontrol messages? Implications of weight-control advertisements for the health of African American women. Howard Journal of Communications, 7, 349–364, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guillen E.O., Barr S.I.: Nutrition, dieting, and fitness messages in a magazine for adolescent women, 1970–1990. J. Adolesc. Health, 15, 464–472, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen A.E., DiDomenico L.: Diet vs. shape content of popular male and female magazines: A doseresponse relationship to the incidence of eating disorders? Int. J. Eat. Disord., 11, 283–287, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paik H., Comstock G.: The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 21, 516–546, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shrum L.J., Wyler R.S. Jr., O’Guinn T.C.: The effects of television consumption on social perceptions: The use of priming procedures to investigate psychological processes. J. Consumer Research, 24, 447–458, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singer M.I., Slovak K., Frierson T., York P.: Viewing preferences, symptoms of psychological trauma, and violent behaviors among children who watch television. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 37, 1041–1048, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Akers R.L.: Deviant behavior. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bandura A.: Social learning theory. New York, General Learning Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kunkel D., Wilson B.J., Linz D., Potter J., Donnerstein E., Smith S.L., Blumenthal E., Gray T.: Violence in television programming overall: University of California Santa Barbara Study (pp. I1–I172). In: Mediascope, Inc. National Television Violence Study 1994–1995. Studio City, CA, Mediascope, Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gerbner G., Gross L.: Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Signorielli N., Morgan M.: Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenberg B.: Television and role socialization: An overview. In: Pearl D., Bouthilet L., Lazar J. (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties–Volume II: Technical reviews. Rockville, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tiggeman M., Pickering A.S.: Role of television in adolescent women’s body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 20, 199–203, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenberg J.: The encyclopedia of animated cartoons. New York, Facts on File, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maltin L.: Of mice and magic: A history of American animated cartoons. New York, Plume, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Henderson-King D., Henderson-King E., Hoffman L.: Media images and women’s self-evaluations: Social context and importance of attractiveness as moderators. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 27, 1407–1416, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilcox K., Laird J.D.: The impact of media images of super-slender women on women’s self-esteem: Identification, social comparison, and self-perception. J. Res. Person., 34, 278–286, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Durkin S.J., Paxton S.J.: Predictors of vulnerability to reduced body image satisfaction and psychological wellbeing in response to exposure to idealized female media images in adolescent girls. J. Psychosom. Res., 53, 995–1005, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin L.F., Kulik J.A.: Social comparison and women’s body satisfaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 115–123, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Murray S.H., Touyz S.W., Beumont P.J.V.: Awareness and perceived influence of body ideals in the media: A comparison of eating disorder patients and the general community. Eat. Disord., 4, 33–46, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stice E.: Modeling of eating pathology and social reinforcement of the thin-ideal predict onset of bulimic symptoms. Behav. Res. Ther., 36, 931–944, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomsen S.R., McCoy J.K., Williams M.: Internalizing the impossible: Anorexic outpatients’ experiences with women’s beauty and fashion magazines. Eat. Disord., 9, 49–64, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pinhas L., Toner B.B., Ali A., Garfinkel P.E., Stuckless N.: The effects of the ideal of female beauty on mood and body satisfaction. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 25, 223–226, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Eberhardt M.S., Ingram D.D., Makuc D.M., et al.: Urban and rural health chartbook. Health, United States. Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Troiano R.P., Flegal K.M.: Overweight children and adolescents: Description, epidemiology, and demographics. Pediatrics, 101, 497–504, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Menashe C.L., Siegel M.: The power of a frame: An analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues-United States, 1985–1996. Journal of Health Communication, 3, 307–325, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams J.R.: Increasingly artful: Applying commercial marketing communication techniques to family planning communication. Integration, 33, 70–72, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Power J.G., Murphy S.T., Coover G.: Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counter-stereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among ingroups and outgroups. Human Communication Research, 23, 36–58, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Klein Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, H., Shiffman, K.S. Thin is “in” and stout is “out”: What animated cartoons tell viewers about body weight. Eat Weight Disord 10, 107–116 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327532

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327532

Key words

Navigation