Abstract
Background and aims: The effectiveness of community-based fall assessment programs in older people is unclear. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of community-based fall assessment compared with hospital-based assessment. Methods: A randomized un-blind study was conducted in 369 older adults aged 65 years and over at high risk of falling. Participants were drawn from a larger cohort of community-dwelling older people. Eligible participants were identified by means of a simple five-item screening tool. A randomly chosen subset population of people at high risk of falling was then randomized into two arms, community-based and hospital-based fall assessments. The total number of falls in both groups was recorded by following up subjects’ diaries and telephone interviews at 3, 6 and 12 months. Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) for the rate of falls at 12 months between community- and hospital-based assessments were analysed as primary outcome, by intention-to-treat analysis. Results: A total of 349 participants completed the study. Attendance to community-based assessment was significantly higher compared with hospital-based assessment in this older population (p=0.012). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in total number of falls at the 12 month follow-up. According to Negative Binomial regression, the adjusted IRR of falls in the communitybased arm was not significantly different from the hospital-based one (IRR 0.95; 95% CI 0.58–1.45, p=0.83). Conclusion: This study showed the increased risk of falling according to community-based fall assessment program with respect to a traditional hospital-based one in community-dwelling older adults at high risk of falling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Department of Health. Standard 6-Falls. In: National Services Framework for older people, March 2001. Available at: www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyandGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/OlderPeoplesServices/fs/en/PolicyandGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/OlderPeoplesServices/fs/en
Houghton S, Birks V, Whitehead CH, Crotty M. Experience of a falls and injuries risk assessment clinic. Aust Health Rev 2004; 28: 374–81.
Nandy S, Parson S, Cryer C et al. Development and preliminary examination of the predictive validity of the Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) for use in primary care. J Public Health (Oxf) 2005; 27: 129–30.
Feder G, Cryer C, Donovan S, Carter Y. Guidelines for the prevention of falls in people over 65. BMJ 2000; 321: 1007–11.
Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G et al. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. New Engl J Med 1994; 331: 821–7.
Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, Glucksman E, Jackson S, Swift C. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 93–7.
Day L, Fildes B, Gordon I, Fitzharris M, Flamer H, Lord S. Randomised factorial trial of falls prevention among older people living in their own homes. BMJ 2002; 325: 128.
Gates S, Fisher JD, Cooke MW, Carter YH, Lamb SE. Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 336: 130–3.
Cwikel JG, Fried AV, Biderman A, Galinsky D. Validation of a fallrisk screening test, the Elderly Fall Screening Test (EFST), for community- dwelling elderly. Disabil Rehabil 1998; 20: 161–7.
Maly RC, Hirsch SH, Reuben DB. The performance of simple instruments in detecting geriatric conditions and selecting community- dwelling older people for geriatric assessment. Age Ageing 1997; 26: 223–31.
Perell KL, Nelson A, Goldman RL, Luther SL, Prieto-Lewis N, Rubenstein LZ. Fall risk assessment measures: an analytic review. J Gerontol Med Sci 2001; 56: M761–6.
O’Loughlin JL, Robitaille Y, Boivin JF, Suissa S. Incidence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the communitydwelling elderly. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137: 342–54.
Lamb SE, Jørstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, Becker C; Prevention of Falls Network Europe and Outcomes Consensus Group. Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 1618–22.
Overstall PW. Falls. Rev Clin Gerontol 1992; 2: 31–8.
Lightbody E, Watkins C, Leathley M, Sharma A, Lye M. Evaluation of a nurse-led falls prevention programme versus usual care: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing 2002; 31: 203–10.
Hauer K, Lamb SE, Jorstad EC, Todd C, Becker C, PROFANEGroup. Systematic review of definitions and methods of measuring falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials. Age Ageing 2006; 35: 5–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suman, S., Myint, P.K., Clark, A. et al. Community-based fall assessment compared with hospital-based assessment in community-dwelling older people over 65 at high risk of falling: a randomized study. Aging Clin Exp Res 23, 35–41 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324951
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324951