Skip to main content
Log in

Ploidity and cell cycle progression during treatment with gold chloride, auranofin and sodium aurothiomalate

Studies on a human epithelial cell line and its sub-strains made resistant to the antiproliferative effects of these gold compounds

  • Published:
Virchows Archiv B

Summary

The possible influence of gold(III) chloride and the two gold(I)-containing anti-arthritic drugs, auranofin and sodium aurothiomalate, on cellular ploidity and cell cycle progression was investigated on cultured human epithelial cells. Four different cell lines were used: the parent line (HE) and three sub-strains which previously had acquired resistance to the antiproliferative effects of either 350 μmol gold chloride/1 culture medium (HEAu350), 2 μmol auranofin/1 (HEAF) or 300 μmol sodium aurothiomalate/1 (HEMyo). DNA-histograms were obtained by flow cytometry examinations during a 9-days’ exposure to either of these gold-containing compounds and concentrations. The HE, HEAF and HEMyo cells had similar ploidities, close to tetraploid. The HEAu350 cells had altered ploidity to distinct tetraploid. The distribution of the resistant cells with the cell cycle phases was not different from that of untreated HE cells. The HE cells, when treated with auranofin or sodium aurothiomalate, accumulated in the G2-phase of the cell cycle. In addition, a new cedecoploid peak appeared. No such changes were observed on gold chloride exposure or in HE controls grown without drug supplement. The effects of auranofin and sodium aurothiomalate on cell cycle progression of the HE cells possibly indicate a tendency to polyploidity, and furthermore that inhibition of cellular mitosis is one mechanism of the antiproliferative effect common to the two drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkhan E (1972) DNA-Messung von Zellen aus Vaginalabstrichen. Einfache Färbmethode für die impulszytophotometrische Messung. Ärtzl Lab 18: 77–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bøyum A (1976) Isolation of lymphocytes, granulocytes and macrophages. Scand J Immunol 5:[suppl 5]9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa M, Cantoni O, de Mars M, Swartzendruber DE (1982) Toxic metals produce an S-phasespecific cell cycle block. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 38: 405–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das HR, Lavin M, Sicuso A, Young DL (1983) The uncoupling of macromolecular synthesis from cell division in SV3T3 cells by glucocorticoids: The imposition of a G2 block. J Cell Physiol 117: 241–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eigsti OJ, Dustin Jr, P (1957) Colchisine — in agriculture, medicine, biology and chemistry. The Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein AE, Burrone OR, Walz DT, Misher A (1977) Effect of auranofin on DNA and protein synthesis in human lymphocytes. J Rheumatol 4: 245–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glennås A, Bakka A, Rugstad HE (1983) Cultured human cells with a high content of metallothionein show resistance against gold-chloride. Scand J Rheumatol 12: 321–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glennås A, Rugstad HE (1985) Acquired resistance against gold(III)-chloride in cultured human cells. Scand J Rheumatol 14: 25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glennås A, Rugstad HE (1985 a) Acquired resistance against auranofin in cultured human cells. Scand J Rheumatol [in press]

  • Glennås A, Rugstad HE (1985 b) Cultured human cells with high levels of cytosolic gold binding metallothionein are not resistant to the antiproliferative effect of sodium aurothiomalate. Ann Rheum Dis [in press]

  • Goldberg RL, Parrott DP, Kaplan SR, Fuller GC (1980) Effect of gold sodium thiomalate on proliferation of human rheumatoid synovial cells and on collagen synthesis in tissue culture. Biochem Pharmacol 29: 869–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill BT (1978) Cancer chemotherapy. The relevance of certain concepts of cell cycle kinetics. Biochim Biophys Acta 516: 389–417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabelli CK, Crooke ST (1983) Pharmacology of auranofin — a review and future perspective. In: Capell HA, Cole DS, Manghani KK, Morris RW (eds) Auranofin. Current clinical practice series 7. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirabelli CK, Johnson RK, Sung CM, Faucette L, Muirhead K, Crooke ST (1985) Evaluation of thein vivo antitumor activity andin vitro cytotoxic properties of auranofin, a coordinated gold compound, in murine tumor models. Cancer Res 45: 32–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips HJ (1973) Dye Exclusion Test for Cell Viability. In: Kruse, Jr, PF, Patterson Jr, MK (eds) Tissue culture. Methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 406–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Ree K, Johnsen AS, Rugstad HE, Bakka A, Hovig T (1981) Characterization of a human epithelial cell line with special reference to its ultrastructure. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [Sect A] 89: 73–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simon TM, Kunishima DH, Vibert GJ, Lorber A (1979) Cellular antiproliferative action exerted by auranofin. J Rheumatol 6: [suppl 5]91–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glennås, A., Rugstad, H.E. Ploidity and cell cycle progression during treatment with gold chloride, auranofin and sodium aurothiomalate. Virchows Archiv B Cell Pathol 49, 385–393 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912115

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912115

Key words

Navigation