Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental evaluation of peritoneum and pericardium as dural substitutes

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Research in Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Although many substances have been tested in the search for an ideal dural substitute, an entirely satisfactory material has still not been found. The authors report an experimental study involving the closure of dural defects in rabbits with biomaterials developed from pig peritoneum and pericardium. Macroscopic and histologic examination, performed over a period between 15 and 45 days after implantation showed slight or no adhesion between the graft material and the cortex. No infection, CSF leakage, fistula or toxicity was noticed. The results demonstrated that these biomaterials could be used as satisfactory dural substitutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott WM, Dupree EL (1970) The procurement, storage and transplantation of lyophilised human cadaver dura mater. Surg Gynecol Obstet 130:112–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adegbite AB, Paine KWE, Rozdilsky B (1983) The role of neomembranes in formation of hematoma around silastic dura substitute. J Neurosurg 58:295–297

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bang-Zong X, Hong-xue P, Ke-Ming L, Xi-Jin C, Ying-Dei T, Yong-Lin L, Jian L (1988) Study and clinical application of a porcine biomembrane for the repair of dural defects. J Neurosurg 69:707–711

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chao Yi-C, Humphreys S, Penfield W (1940) A new method of preventing adhesions. The use of amnioplastin after craniotomy. Br M J 30:517–519

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen AR, Aleksic S, Ransohoff J (1989) Inflammatory reaction to synthetic dural substitute. J Neurosurg 70:633–635

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Delustro F, Dash J, Keefe J, Elingsworth L (1990) Immune response to allogenic and xenogenic implants of collagen and collagen derivatives. Clin Orthop 260:263–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huertas J (1955) The use of orlon for dural replacement. J Neurosurg 12:550–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleine DG, Arbor A (1965) Dural replacement resorbable collagen. Arch Surg 91:924–929

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laquerriere A, Yun J, Tiollier J, Hemet J, Tadie M (1993) Experimental evaluation bilayered human collagen as a dural substitute. J Neurosurg 78:487–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Laun A, Tonn C, Jerusalem C (1990) Comparative study of lyophized human dura mater and lyophilized bovine pericardium as dural substitutes in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 107:16–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehman RAW, Hayes GJ, Martins AN (1967) The use of adhesive and lyophilized dura in the treatment of cerebrospinal rhinorhea. Technical note. J Neurosurg 26:92–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JF, Odom GL, Tindall GT (1967) Experimental evaluation of silicone-coated Dacron and collagen fabric-film laminate as dural substitutes. J Neurosurg 27:558–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Macfarlane MR, Symon L (1979) Lyophilised dura mater: experimental implantation and extended clinical neurosurgical use. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42:854–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maurer PK, McDonald JV (1985) Vicryl (Polyglactin 910) mesh as a dural substitute. J Neurosurg 63:448–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan A, Disant F, Truy E (1989) Experimental study of collagen as eardrum graft support in dogs. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 107:450–455

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nussbaum CE, Maurer PK, McDonald JV (1989) Vicryl (Polyglactin 910) mesh as a dural substitute in the presence of pia arachnoid injury. J Neurosurg 71:124–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Neill P, Booth A (1984) Use of porcine dermis as a dural substitute in 72 patients. J Neurosurg 61:351–354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson RCL, Peacher WG (1945) The use of tantalium foil in the subdural space. J Neurosurg 2:281–284

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson D, Robson A (1984) Recurrent subaarchnoid bleeding in association with dural substitute. J Neurosurg 60:408–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thadani V, Penar PL, Partington J, Kalb R, Janssen R, Schonberger LB, Rabkin CS, Prichard JW (1988) Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease probably acquired from cadaveric dura mater graft. J Neurosurg 69:766–769

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gök, A., Zorludemir, S., Polat, S. et al. Experimental evaluation of peritoneum and pericardium as dural substitutes. Res. Exp. Med. 195, 31–38 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02576771

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02576771

Key words

Navigation