Abstract
This study reports on a systematic statewide effort to determine the residential needs and preferences of two important groups: primary consumers of mental health services and family members of consumers. Two comparable surveys regarding the residential needs of consumers were conducted. In all, 314 consumers and 459 family members participated in the survey. A comparison of the preferences of family members and consumers suggests that family members more often prefer congregate living situations and more staff support than do consumers. Consumers more often express a desire to reside by themselves without staff and without other persons who are mentally ill. While the direct comparison of preferences from these two constituencies has limitations, these data do suggest significant variability in needs and preferences voiced by consumers and their family members; discrepancies that need to be addressed by mental health policymakers and planners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. NASMHPD position paper on consumer contributions to mental health service delivery systems, 1989. (Available from NASMHPD, 1101 King St., Suite 160, Alexandria, VA 22314).
Rissmeyer DJ: Giving patients a voice.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1988 39(4):443.
Hollander R: A new service ideology: The third mental health revolution.Professional Psychology 1980; 11(4): 561–566.
Chamberlin J, Rogers J: Planning a community-based mental health system: Perspective of service recipients.American Psychologist 1990; 45(11):1241–1244.
Elbeck M, Fecteau G: Improving the validity of measures of patient satisfaction with psychiatric care and treatment.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 9:998–1000.
Tanzman B: Researching the preferences of people with psychiatric disabilities for housing and supports: A practical guide. Monograph, University of Vermont, Center for Community Change, 1990.
Skinner EA, Steinwachs DM, Kasper, JA: Family perspectives on the service needs of people with severe and persistent mental illness. Part I: Characterization of families and consumers.Innovations and Research 1992; 1(3):23–30.
Cromwell HS, Howe JW, O’Rear G: Autizon’s coalition on mental health advocacy: The Maryland experience.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1988; 39:959–962.
Dillman D:Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.
House AE, House BJ, Campbell MB: Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formulas and distribution effects.Journal of Behavioral Assessment 1981; 3(1):37–57.
Larson SA, Lakin KC: Parent attitudes about their daughter or son’s residential placement before and after deinstitutionalization.Policy Research Brief 1989; 1(2):1–15.
Lehigh S: DMH may quit group housing.Boston Globe, December 13, 1991.
Parrish J: Supported housing: A critical component of effective community support.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 1990; 13(4):9–10.
Brown MA, Ridgway P, Anthony WA, et al.: Comparison of outcomes for clients seeking and assigned to supported housing services.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1991; 42:1150–1153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogers, E.S., Danley, K.S., Anthony, W.A. et al. The residential needs and preferences of persons with serious mental illness: A comparison of consumers and family members. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 21, 42–51 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521344
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521344