Abstract
The theory of measurement of flow and volume by indicator dilution techniques is given in conditions of time-variable flow rates. It is shown that the usual Hamilton (1932,Am. J. Physiol.,99, 534–551) methods can be misleading if the flow changes at a rate of close to that of the transport function.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Hamilton, W. F., J. M. Kinsman, J. W. Moore, and R. G. Spurling. 1932. “Studies of the Circulation: IV. Further Analysis of the Injection Method, and of Changes in Hemodynamics under Physiological and Pathological Conditions.”Am. J. Physiol.,99, 534–551.
Meier, P. and K. L. Zierler. 1954. “On the Theory of the Indicator-Dilution Method for Measurement of Blood Flow and Volume.”J. of Appl. Physiol.,12, 731–744.
Stephenson, J. L. 1948. “Theory of the Measurement of Blood Flow by the Dilution of an Indicator.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,10, 117–121.
Stephenson, J. L. 1958. “Theory of Measurement of Blood Flow by Dye Dilution Techniques.”IRE Transactions on Medical Electronics, PGME,12, 82–88.
Stewart, G. N. 1897. “Researches on the Circulation Time and on the Influences Which Affect It: IV. The Output of the Heart.”J. Physiol.,22, 159–183.
Zadeh, L. H. 1950. “Frequency Analysis of Variable Networks.”Proc. IRE,38, 291–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Operated with support from the United States Army, Navy, and Air Force.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sherman, H. On the theory of indicator-dilution methods under varying blood-flow conditions. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 22, 417–424 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476723
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476723