Abstract
Vertical mammaplasty has been perfected and popularized by Madeline Lejour; this technique is one of the most versatile methods of manunaplasty today. The vertical scar from the nipple areola to the submammary line is often much longer and distorted than the conventional mammaplastys. The length of the vertical scar can be reduced by 2–3 cm by combining the skin pattern of the periareolar and vertical mammaplasty. The aesthetic result can be improved by shortening the vertical scar.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auclair E, Mitz V: Repair of mammary ptosis by insertion of an internal absorbable support and periareolar scar. Ann Plast Surg38:107, 1993
Benelli L: A new periareolar mammaplasty: The “round block” technique. Aesth Plast Surg14:93, 1990
Hinderer UT: Plastia mamaria modelante e dermopexia superficial y retromamaria. Rev Esp Cir Plast5:521, 1972
Hinderer UT: Evolution of technique in mammaplasty and personal choice. Worldplast1:11, 1995
Lejour M, Abboud M: Vertical mammaplasty without inframammary scar and with liposuction. Perspect Plast Surg4:67, 1990
Lejour M: Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction. Quality Medical Publishing, Inc. 1994
Marchac D, Olarte G: Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis with a short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg69:1, 1982 Lejour M, Abboud M, Declety A, Kertesz P. Réduction des cicatrices de plastie mammarire: De l'ancere courte à la verticale. Ann Chir Plast Esth35:369, 1989
Marchioni E: Surgical treatment of tuberous breasts with bilateral mega-areola with a periareolar scar technique. Ann Plast Surg30:363, 1993
Peled I, Zagher U, Wexler MR: Purse-string suture for reduction and closure of skin defects. Ann Plast Surg14:465, 1985
Pickford MA: Early experience with the Lejour vertical scar reduction mammaplasty technique. Br J Plast Surg46:516, 1993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gulyás, G. Combination of the vertical and periareolar mammaplasty. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 20, 369–375 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390310
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390310