Abstract
Background: The success of lumpectomy and radiotherapy is dependent on minimizing the residual tumor burden in the breast. Histologic margin status is one measure of the extent of residual tumor. This study was undertaken to determine the success rate of a single conservative lumpectomy in obtaining negative margins and to evaluate the incidence of residual tumor after biopsies with positive or unknown margins.
Methods: This is a retrospective study covering a 5-year period (June 1988–June 1993).
Results: Three hundred sixteen women had lumpectomies. In 239, lumpectomy was the initial operation after a positive fine-needle aspiration or as a diagnostic procedure. Thirteen cases had positive margins. Reexcision was performed in 90 cases. The indication for reexcision was a positive margin in 42 cases (4 with gross tumor) and unknown margin status in 48. Nineteen of the reexcisions for positive margins and 20 of the reexcisions for unknown margins contained residual tumor. Eighty-six (96%) of the 90 reexcised patients underwent breast preserving surgery. Patient age, menopausal status, histologic tumor type, tumor size, and clinical presentation were not predictive of residual tumor.
Conclusions: The need for reexcision does not preclude breast preservation. Because single-stage lumpectomy is successful in achieving negative margins in 95% of patients, diagnostic biopsy without margin evaluation should be abandoned to avoid routine reexcision.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Khettry U, Mazoujian G, Brenner M, Silver B, Recht A, et al. Pathologic findings on reexcision of the primary site in breast cancer patients considered for treatment by primary radiation therapy.Cancer 1987;59:675–81.
Anscher MS, Jones P, Prosnitz LR, Blackstock W, Hebert M, Reddick R, Tucker A, et al. Local failure and margin status in early stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.Ann Surg 1993;218:22–28.
Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DL, Goodman RL. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21:279–87.
Schmidt-Ullrich R, Wazer DE, Tercilla O, Safaii H, Marchant DJ, Smith TJ, Homer MA, et al. Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:733–8.
Winchester DP, Cox JD. Standards for breast conserving surgery.CA 1992;42:134–62.
Vicini FA, Eberlein TJ, Connolly JL, Recht A, Abner A, Schnitt S, Silen W, et al. The optimal extent of resection for patients with stage I or II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy.Ann Surg 1991;214:200–5.
Solin LJ, Fowble B, Martz K, Pajak TF, Goodman RL. Results of reexcisional biopsy of the primary tumor in preparation for definitive irradiation of patients with early stage breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986;12:721–5.
Stotter AT, McNeese MD, Ames FC, Oswald MJ, Ellerbroek NA. Predicting the rate and extent of locoregional failure after breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer.Cancer 1989;64:2217–25.
Gwin JL, Eisenberg BL, Hoffman JP, Ottery FD, Borass M, Solin LJ. Incidence of gross and microscopic carcinoma in specimens from patients with breast cancer after reexcision lumpectomy.Ann Surg 1993;218:729–34.
Morrow M, Quiet C, Hellman S. Treatment selection in breast cancer: are our biases correct?Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1994;13:99.
Healy EA, Osteen RT, Schnitt SJ, Gelman R, Stomper P, Connolly J, Harris J. Can technical and mammographic findings at presentation predict the presence of an extensive intraductal component in early stage breast cancer?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:1217–21.
Wolberg WH. Surgical options in 424 patients with primary breast cancer without systemic metastases.Arch Surg 1991;126:817–20.
Pezner RD, Patterson MP, Lipsett JA, OdonMaryon T, Vora N, Wong J, Luk K. Factors affecting cosmetic outcome in breast conserving cancer treatment objective quantitative assessment.Br Ca Res Treat 1991;20:85–92.
Veronisi U, Volterrani F, Luini A, Saccozzi R, DelVecchio M, Zucali R, Galimberti V, et al. Quadrantectomy vs. lumpectomy for small size breast cancer.Eur J Cancer 1990;26:671–3.
Olivotto IA, Rose MA, Osteen RT, Love S, Cady B, Silver B, Recht A, et al. Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:747.
Wazer DE, DiPetrillo T, Schmidt-Ulrich R, Weld L, Smith T, Marchant D, Robert N. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early stage breast carcinoma.J Clin Oncol 1992;10:356–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kearney, T.J., Morrow, M. Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2, 303–307 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307061
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307061