Skip to main content
Log in

Cytotoxic drug treatment of reactive amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis with special reference to renal insufficiency

  • Originals
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Twenty-two patients with amyloidosis secondary to rheumatoid arthritis were randomised and followed prospectively in order to determine whether treatment with cytotoxic drugs could postpone the development of end-stage renal failure. The diagnosis of amyloidosis was based on albuminuria, amyloid-positive rectal and/or abdominal fat aspiration and/or renal biopsies. Renal function was followed by repeated51Cr-EDTA measurements of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Urinary albumin and serum-creatinine were found unreliable as predictors of renal function. GFR declined more rapidly in the patient group receiving only symptomatic drugs and no cytotoxic drugs (NT-group). After an initial decline, the GFR in the cytotoxic drug treatment group (T-group), mean treatment quotient 79%, levelled off and remained constant for a considerable time. The mean observation time was 45.7 months in the NT-group and 53.5 months in the T-group. Seven out of eleven patients in the NT-group developed end-stage renal disease, compared to two out of eleven patients in the T-group. The cumulative proportion of survivors in the NT-group at 36 and 60 months was 71% and 27% respectively. The corresponding figures in the T-group were 89% and 89%. The difference in favour of the cytotoxic drug-treated group was significant (p<0.04).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glenner, G.G. Amyloidosis: Its nature and pathogenesis. Semin Hematol. 1973, 10, 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bywaters, E.G.L., Ansell, B.M., Smith, M.E. Amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis. In: Amyloidosis. Eds. E. Mandema, L. Ruinen, E.H. Schollen, M.S. Cohen, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam. 1968, pp. 391–399.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lender, M., Wolf, E. Incidence of amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1972, 1, 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhlbäck, B., Wegelius, O. Secondary amyloidosis. A study of clinical and pathological findings. Acta Med Scand 1966, 180, 737–745.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt, K., Cathcart, E.S., Cohen, A.S. A clinical analysis of the course and prognosis of forty-two patients with amyloidosis. Amer J Med 1968, 44, 955–969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Husby, G. Amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Clin Res 1975, 7, 154–167.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tribe, C.R., Mackenzie, J.C. Amyloidosis. In: The Kidney and Rheumatic Disease, Ed: P.A. Bacon, N.M. Hadler, Butterworth Scientific 1982, 297–322.

  8. Triger, D.R., Joekes, A.M. Renal amyloidosis—a fourteen-year follow-up. Q J Med, New Series XVII 1973, 165, 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parkins, R.A., Bywaters, E.G.L. Regression of amyloidosis secondary to rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J 1959, Feb 28, 536–540.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braun, H.J. Klinik, Diagnostik und Therapie der Amyloidosen. Med Klin. 1972, 40, 1271–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ropes, M.W., Bennett, G.A., Cobb, S.et al.: 1958 revision of diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Rheum Dis. 1958, Dec, 175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ritchie, D.M., Boyle, J.A., Mc Innes, J.M. et al. Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Q J Med 1968, 147, 393–406.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C.M., Batterman, R.C. Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoi arthritis. JAMA, 1949, 140, 659–662.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Waaler, E. On the occurrence of a factor in human serum activating the specific agglutination of sheep blood corpuscles. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1940, 17, 172–188.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rose, H.M., Ragan, C., Pearce, E., Lipman, M.O. Differential agglutination of normal and sensitized sheep erythrocytes by sera of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1948, 68, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Puchtler, H., Sweat, F., Levine, M. On the binding of Congo red by amyloid. J Histochem Cytochem 1962, 10, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stokes, G. An improved Congo red method for amyloid. Med Lab Sciences 1976, 33, 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arapakis, G., Tribe, C.R. Amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis investigated by means of rectal biopsy. Ann Rheum Dis 1963, 22, 256–262.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhlbäck, B. Renal biopsy in the diagnosis of amyloidosis. In Amyloidosis. Eds: O. Wegelius, A. Pasternack, Academic Press, 1976, 387–391.

  20. Westermark, P., Stenkvist, B. A new method for the diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis. Arch Intern Med 1973, 132, 522–523.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nived, O., Sturfelt, G., Westling, H., White, T. Is serum creatinine concentration a reliable index of renal function in rheumatic diseases? Br Med J 1983, 286, 684–685.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brøchner-Mortensen J.A. Simple method for determination of glomerular filtration rate. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1972, 30, 271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Granérus, G., Aurell, M. Reference values for51Cr-EDTA clearance as a measure of glomerular filtration rate. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1981, 41, 611–616.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Olhagen, B. Immunosuppressive treatment of rheumatological diseases. Sv Läkartidn 1976, 73, 1628–1633.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Berglund, K., Johansson, B.G., Laurell, A-B. et al. Inflammatory parameters in rheumatoid arthritis during and after administration of an anti-miotic agent (Podophyllum lignan derivatives) Scand J Rheumatol 1978, 7, 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bradley, J.V. A linear non-parametric permutation test for paired observations. In Distribution-free Statistical Tests, Prentice-Hall Inc. 1968, 68–86.

  27. Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P. Nonparametric estimations from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc 1958, 53, 457–481.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mantel, N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Reports 1966, 50, 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Browning, M.J., Banks, R.A., Tribe, C.R. et al. Ten years' experience of an amyloid clinic — a clinico-pathological survey. Q J Med, New Series 54 1985, 215, 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ahlmén, M., Bjelle, A., Svalander. Diagnostic biopsy methods of secondary amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Abstract. Svenska Läkaresällskapets Riksstämma, 1982.

  31. Westermark, P., Sletten, K., Eriksson, M. Morphological and chemical variation of the kidney lesions in amyloidosis secondary to rheumatoid arthritis. Lab Invest 1979, 41, 427–341.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Husby, G., Natvig, J.B., Sletten, K. Immunologic and chemical properties of human amyloid fibril proteins and structurally related serum components: Application in clinical medicine. In: Amyloidosis. Eds: O. Wegelius, A. Pasternack, Academic Press, 1976, 299–310.

  33. Husebekk, A., Skogen, B., Husby, G. et al. Transformation of amyloid precursor SAA to protein-AA and incorporation in amyloid fibrils in vivo. Scand J Immunol 1985, 21, 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maury, C.P.J. Serum amyloid A protein — current status. Scand J Rheumatol (Editorial) 1981, 13, 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Falck, H.M., Maury, C.P.J., Teppo, A-M., Wegelius, O. Persistently high serum amyloid A protein and C-reactive protein levels correlate with rapid progression of secondary amyloidosis. Br Med J 1983, 286, 1391–1393.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Treatment of renal amyloidosis. Lancet 1980, May 17, 1062–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fuks, A., Zucker-Franklin, D. Impaired Kupffer cell function precedes development of secondary amyloidosis. J Exp Med 1985, 161, 1013–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schnitzer, T.J., Ansell, B.M. Amyloidosis in juvenile chronic polyarthritis. Arthritis Rheum (Suppl) 1977, 20, 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wegelius, O., Wafin, F., Falck, H.M., Törnroth, T. Follow-up study of amyloidosis secondary to rheumatic disease In Amyloid and Amyloidosis. Eds: G.G. Glenner, P.P. e Costa, A.F. de Frettas, Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1980, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wright, J.R., Calkins, E. Clinical-pathologic differentiation of common amyloid syndromes. Medicine (Baltimore) 1981, 6, 429–448.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Berglund, K., Laurell, A.B., Nived, O. et al. Complement activation, circulating C1q-binding substances and inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: relation and changes on suppression of inflammation. J Clin Lab Immunol 1980, 4, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Norberg, B., Berglund, K., Edström, U.B. et al. Effects on bone marrow cells of oral treatment with podophyllotoxin derivatives in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1985, 14, 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cove-Smith, R. Analgesic nephropathy: pathogensis, clinical features and association with rheumatoid arthritis. In: The Kidney and Rheumatic Disease. Eds: P.A. Bacon, N.M. Hadler, Butterworth Scientific 1982, 228–245.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahlmen, M., Ahlmen, J., Svalander, C. et al. Cytotoxic drug treatment of reactive amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis with special reference to renal insufficiency. Clin Rheumatol 6, 27–38 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02200997

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02200997

Key words

Navigation