Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors influencing the outcome of operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

96 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were operated on after two to sixteen years of disabling symptoms. There were 50 women and 46 men with a mean age of 59 years. 33 of the patients had been previously operated on for spinal complaints. A laminectomy was performed in 61 patients; at one level in 31 patients, at two levels in 23 patients, and at three levels in seven patients. A hemilaminectomy was performed in 35 patients; at one level in 28 patients, at two levels in five patients, and at three levels in two patients. There were neither internal fixation devices used, nor spondylodesis performed in these operations. Special attention was focused on the effect of age, sex, body mass index and smoking, as well as previous surgery and extent of surgical intervention on the outcome of operative treatment. The follow-up time was 3–11 years (5.5 mean).

Laminectomy at one level resulted in significantly most acceptable results of operative treatment methods. Younger patients and women were more prone to inferior results of operative treatment. Also the extent of surgical intervention, overweight and smoking seemed to have a tendency to worsen the result of operative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Echeverria T, Lockwood RC (1979) Lumbar spinal stenosis: experience at a community hospital. N Y State J Med 79: 872–873

    Google Scholar 

  2. Getty CJM (1980) Lumbar spinal stenosis. The clinical spectrum and the results of operation. J Bone Joint Surg 62 B: 481–485

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grabias S (1980) The treatment of spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg 62 A: 308–313

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herron L, Mangelsdorf C (1991) Lumbar spinal stenosis: results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 4: 26–33

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson K-E, Willner S, Johnson K (1986) Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 11: 107–110

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson K, Rosen I, Uden A (1990) The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthop Scand 61 [Suppl] 237: 24

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge HJ, Young-Hing K, Reilly J (1978) Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine 3: 319–328

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mauersberger W, Nietgen T (1989) Surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis: long-term results. Neurosurg Rev 12: 291–295

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paine KWE (1976) Clinical features of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 115: 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Verbiest H (1954) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg 36 B: 230–237

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wiltse LL (1977) Surgery for intervertebral disc disease of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 129: 22–45

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zdeblick TA (1993) A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine 18: 983–991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehto, M.U.K., Honkanen, P. Factors influencing the outcome of operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta neurochir 137, 25–28 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02188775

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02188775

Keywords

Navigation