Skip to main content
Log in

Experience with a physician-directed, clinic-based program for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in the USA

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The experience with 538 patients who received outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) in 1993 in a private institute in Tacoma, Washington, USA, is reviewed here. Clinical outcomes suggested a successful resolution of infection in 99 % of cases. Bacteriological outcomes showed that eradication of the organism had occurred in 92 % of patients by the end of therapy. The success of the program indicates that 91 % of properly selected patients can be treated without adverse events. Antibiotics were changed in 45 (8 %) instances, but only half of these changes were made because of an adverse event. The development of rash was the most frequent adverse event and resulted in hospitalization in only 1 instance. Hospitalization was necessary before the OPAT program was completed in 42 cases −20 of those were for surgery and 13 for medical reasons unrelated to the infection or antibiotic therapy. In 8 cases, patients were hospitalized because of failure of home care or inability to administer the antibiotics effectively. Three patients were taken off the program because of failure to comply. Patient satisfaction surveys suggested that 99 % of patients were satisfied with the program. With careful patient selection and a well-developed program, OPAT can be safe, effective and beneficial to patients and can save costs in healthcare services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balinsky W, Nesbitt S: Cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotics: a review of the literature. American Journal of Medicine 1989, 87: 301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poretz DM, Eron LJ, Goldenberg RI, Gilbert AF, Rising J, Sparks S, Horne CE: Intravenous antibiotic therapy in an outpatient setting. Journal of the American Medical Association 1982, 248: 336–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rehm SJ, Weinstein AJ: Home intravenous antibiotic therapy: a team approach. Annals of Internal Medicine 1983, 99: 388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tice AD: The team concept. Symposium on outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Hospital Practice 1993, 28, Supplement 1: 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tice AD: An office model of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1991, 13, Supplement 2: 184–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tice AD: Osteomyelitis. Symposium on outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Hospital Practice 1993, 28, Supplement 2: 36–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown RB: Selection and training of patients for outpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1991, 13, Supplement 2: 147.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown RB: Selecting the patient. Symposium on outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Hospital Practice 1993, 28, Supplement 2: 36–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tice, A.D. Experience with a physician-directed, clinic-based program for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in the USA. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14, 655–661 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690748

Keywords

Navigation