Skip to main content
Log in

The prognostic role of the DNA ploidy pattern in colorectal cancer analysis using paraffin-embedded tissue by an improved method

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the prognostic value of DNA ploidy in colorectal cancer, compared with the histopathological findings, paraffin-embedded surgical specimens from 330 patients who underwent resection for primary adenocarcinoma were studied using a new modified method of flow cytometry. Of these specimens, 141 were DNA diploid and 189, DNA aneuploid, among which there were 3 DNA hypodiploid lesions. Of the ten variables studied in curative resection, DNA ploidy ranked fourth in prognostic significance according to the linear trend by the χ2 test, after nodal status, grade of cellular differentiation, and degree of invasive growth, if the DNA ploidy pattern was classified into three categories. Conversely, DNA ploidy was the sixth most significant factor if DNA hypodiploidy was included in the DNA aneuploidy. The Cox multivariate analysis showed that DNA ploidy was one of the five significant factors independently determining prognosis; however, if adjustment for the modified Dukes' stage was made by the Mantel-Haenszel test, the survival difference between the diploid and aneuploid groups did not reach a statistically significant level. Thus, we conclude that from a practical point of view, DNA ploidy is not an essential factor which must be combined with histopathological variables for a better prediction of patient outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hedley DW (1989) Flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissue: Five years on. Cytometry 10:229–241

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armitage NC, Robins RA, Evans DF, Turner DR, Baldwin RW, Hardcastle JD (1985) The influence of tumour cell DNA abnormalities on survival in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 72:828–830

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kokal W, Sheibani K, Terz J, Harada R (1986) Tumor DNA content in the prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. JAMA 255: 3123–3127

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scott NA, Weiland HS, Moertel CG, Cha SS, Beart RW, Lieber MM (1987) Colorectal cancer, Dukes' stage, tumor site, preoperative plasma CEA level, and patient prognosis related to tumor DNA ploidy pattern. Arch Surg 122:1375–1379

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW, Rugg CA, Musgrove EA (1984) DNA flow cytometry of paraffin-embedded tissue. Cytometry 5:660

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vindeløv LL, Christensen IJ, Nissen NI (1983) A detergenttrypsin 1 method for the preparation of nuclei for flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry 3:323–327

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sickle-Santanello BJ, Farrar WB, DeCenzo JF, Keyhani-Rofagha S, Mein J, Pearl D, Laufman H, Otoole RV (1988) Technical and statistical improvements for flow cytometric DNA analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue. Cytometry 9:594–599

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mantel N (1963) Chi-square tests with one-degree of freedom: Extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. J Amer Stat Assoc 58:690–700

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pete R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, Mantel N, McPherson K, Peto J, Smith PG (1977) Design and analysis of randomized clinical trial requiring prolonged observation of each patient. Analysis of examples. Br J Cancer 35:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Roy Stat Soc B 34:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  11. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 1033–1055

    Google Scholar 

  12. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Contr AC-19:716–723

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turnbull RB Jr, Kyle K, Watson FR, Spratt J (1967) Cancer of the colon: The influence of the no-touch isolation technique on survival rate. Ann Surg 166:420–427

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Tayler IW, Rugg CA, Musgrove EA (1983) Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 31:1333–1335

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shutte B, Reynders MMJ, Bosman FT, Blijham GH (1985) Flow cytometric determination of DNA ploidy level in nuclei isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue. Cytometry 6:26–30

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Driel-Kulker AMJ, Mesker WE, van Velzzen I, Tanke HJ, Feichtinger TJ, Ploem JS (1985) Preparation of monolayer smears from paraffin-embedded tissue for image cytometry. Cytometry 6:268–272

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oud PS, Hanselaar TGJM, Reubsaet-Veldhuizen JAM, Meijer JWR, Gemmink AH, Pahlplatz MMM, Beck HLM, Vooijs GP (1986) Extraction of nuclei from selected regions in paraffinembedded tissue. Cytometry 7:595–600

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan RJ, Gonchoroff JNJ, Katzmann JA, Witzig TE, Kyle RA, Greipp PR (1989) Detection of hypodiploidy using multiparameter flow cytometric analysis: A prognostic indicator in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 30:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sasaki K, Takahashi M, Hashimoto T, Kawachnino K (1989) Flow cytometric DNA measurement of gastric cancers. Clinicopathological implication of DNA ploidy. Path Res Pract 184:561–566

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salvati F, Teodori L, Gagliardi L, Signora M, Aquilini M, Storniello G (1989) DNA flow cytometric studies of 66 human lung tumors analyzed before treatment. Prognostic implications. Chest 96:1092–1098

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pui C, Carroll AJ, Raimondi SC, Land VJ, Crist WM, Shuster JJ, Williams DL, Pullen DJ, Borowitz MJ, Behn FG, Look AT (1990) Clinical presentation, karyotypic characterization, and treatment outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with a near-haploid or hypodiploid <45 line. Blood 75:1170–1177

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quirke P, Dyson JED, Dixon MF, Bird CC, Joslin CAF (1985) Heterogeneity of colorectal adenocarcinomas evaluated by flow cytometry and histopathology. Br J Cancer 51:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scott NA, Grande JP, Weiland LH,Pemberton JH, Beart RW, Lieber MM (1987) Flow cytometric DNA patterns from colorectal cancers — How reproducible are they? Mayo Clin Proc 62:331–337

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamazoe, Y., Maetani, S., Nishikawa, T. et al. The prognostic role of the DNA ploidy pattern in colorectal cancer analysis using paraffin-embedded tissue by an improved method. Surg Today 24, 30–36 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676881

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676881

Key Words

Navigation