Abstract
New studies monitoring ambulatory esophageal pressures during food ingestion often compare results to normal values obtained from supine liquid swallows. We compared distal esophageal peristaltic and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures in 15 normal subjects during six liquid swallows in the upright and supine positions, and six solid (small marshmallow) swallows in upright position. LES pressures were significantly ( P <0.05) higher supine than upright but no differences were noted in LES pressure, relaxation, and duration of relaxation between upright solid and liquid swallows. Distal peristaltic wave velocities were faster upright than supine. Peristaltic wave amplitudes, durations, and DP/DT were significantly (P <0.05) greater in supine than in upright position. Atypical wave forms, defined as nontransmitted, simultaneous, and simultaneous/repetitive, increased in the upright position compared to supine (P <0.01), and during solid vs liquid swallows (P <0.05). These results indicate that body position substantially affects normal distal esophageal peristalsis and LES pressure and that “abnormal” wave forms occur more frequently during swallowing solids than liquids in the upright position. Conclusions regarding “abnormal” motility over prolonged periods and during food ingestion in patients should be tempered by these findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen ML, Orr WC, Mellow MH, Robinson MG: Water swallows versus food ingestion as manometric tests for esophageal dysfunction. Gastroenterology 95:831–833, 1988
Mellow MH: Esophageal motility during food ingestion: A physiologic test of esophageal motor function. Gastroenterology 85:570–577, 1983
Kaye MD, Wexler RM: Alteration of esophageal peristalsis by body position. Dig Dis Sci 26:897–901, 1981
Castell JA, Dalton CB, Castell DO: Upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal manometry in humans. Am J Physiol 258:6173–6178, 1990
Castell JA, Castell DO: Computer analysis of human esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter pressure II. An interactive system for on-line data collection and analysis. Dig Dis Sci 31:1211–1216, 1986
Castell JA, Dalton CB, Castell DO: On-line computer analysis of human lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Am J Physiol 255:G794-G799, 1988
Richter JE, Wu WC, John DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL, Castell JA, Castell DO: Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers: Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci 32:583–592, 1987
Humphries TJ, Castell DO: Pressure profile of esophageal peristalsis in normal humans as measured by direct intraesophageal transducers. Am J Dig Dis 22:641–645, 1977
Castell DO: The lower esophageal sphincter: Physiologic and clinical aspects. Ann Intern Med 83:390–401, 1975
Babka JC, Hager GW, Castell DO: The effect of body position on lower esophageal sphincter. Am J Dig Dis 18:441–442, 1973
Lind JF, Woman WG, Wankling WJ: Responses of gastroesophageal functional zone to increases in abdominal pressure. Can J Surg 9:32–40, 1966
Fyke FE, Code CF, Schlegel JF: The gastroesophageal sphincter in healthy human beings. Gastroenterologia 86:135–150, 1956
Dooley CP, Schlossmacher B, Vanezuela JE: Effects of alterations in bolus viscosity on esophageal peristalsis in humans. Am J Physiol 254:G8-G11, 1988
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sears, V.W., Castell, J.A. & Castell, D.O. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Digest Dis Sci 35, 857–864 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536799
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536799