Skip to main content
Log in

Terminal ballistics of 7.62 mm NATO bullets: experiments in ordnance gelatin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Military rifle bullets are assumed to tumble 180° in the target and end up facing backwards, but intact. It has been claimed, however, that a German version of the 7.62 mm × 51 (7.62 mm NATO) bullet may fragment at ranges up to 100 m. A lack of strength in the jacket, causing it to break at the cannelure when hitting the target at high impact velocity, has been held responsible for this behaviour. The Danish Armed Forces use a 7.62 mm × 51 bullet, produced by Ammunitionsarsenalet (AMA), which is similar in design. Since the legality of this and similar bullets may be questioned in view of the Hague Declaration of 1899, we decided to supplement an investigation of actual fatal cases with an investigation using ordnance gelatin. In order to compare various makes of bullets on an equal basis, they were fired into ordnance gelatin at various ranges and, consequently with various impact velocities. Bullets manufactured by the US Government, Bofors (Sweden), Raufoss (Norway) and AMA were used. The AMA bullet M/75 used previously was found to fragment at ranges up to approx. 100 m, corresponding to impact velocities of approx. 715 m/sec, while all the other 3 types of bullets were intact at ranges down to 2.5 m, corresponding to impact velocities of approx. 810 m/sec. The final prototype of an AMA bullet to answer this criticism proved capable of withstanding fragmentation as well as the foreign makes previously tested. It will enter series production in late 1995.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albreht M, Scepanovic D, Ceramilac A, Milivojevic V, Berger S, Tasic G, Tatic V, Todoric M, Popovic DJ, Nanusevic N (1979) Experimental soft tissue wounds caused by standard military rifles. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 489:185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin R (1977) Missile injury to live muscle tissue. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 480:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin R, Gelin LE, Janzon B, Lewis DH, Rybeck B, Sandegård J, Seeman T (1976) Local effects of assault rifle bullets in live tissues. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 459:1–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin R, Janzon B, Rybeck B, Sandegård J, Seeman T (1977) Local effects of assault rifle bullets in live tissue: Part II. Further studies in live tissue and relation to some simulant media. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 477:5–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin RH, Janzon B, Lidén E, Nordström G, Schantz B, Seeman T, Westling F (1988) Wound ballistics of Swedish 5.56-mm assault rifle AK 5. J Trauma 28 [Suppl]:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Bree JLMJ van (1993) Behaviour of 5.56 mm projectiles in gelatine. Proceedings 14th International Symposium on Ballistics, Quebec, Canada, 26–29 September 1993, pp 777–784

  • Cooper GJ, Ryan JM (1990) Interaction of penetrating missiles with tissues: some common misapprehensions and implications for wound management. Br J Surg 77:606–610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maio VJM (1985) Wounds from centerfire rifles. In: Di Maio VJM (ed) Gunshot Wounds. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York, pp 139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Fackler ML (1989) Wounding patterns of military rifle bullets. Int Defence Rev 225:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Fackler ML, Malinowski JA (1985) The wound profile; a visual method for quantifying gunshot wound components. J Trauma 25:522–529

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fackler ML, Malinowski JA (1988): Ordnance gelatin for ballistic studies. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 9:218–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granat MG (1993) Modern small-arms ammunition in international law. Neth Int Law Rev 40:149–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson DAW, Marshall TK (1967) Firearm injuries. Br J Surg 54:344–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen PJT, Sørensen OH (1994): The initial yaw of some commonly encountered military rifle bullets. Int J Legal Med 107:141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen PJT, Svender J (1994) Doppler radar velocity measurements for wound ballistics experiments. Int J Legal Med 107:1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen PJT, Theilade P (1993) Terminal ballistics of the 7.62 mm NATO bullet, autopsy findings. Int J Legal Med 106:61–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NATO (1976) STANAG 2310 small arms ammunition (7.62 mm), 3 edn. NATO, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrand I, Janzon B, Rybeck B (1979) Break-up behaviour of some small calibre projectiles when penetrating a dense medium. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 489:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdale BD, Sohn SS (1988) Comparison of the terminal ballistics of full metal jacket 7.62 mm M80 (NATO) and 5.56 mm M 193 military bullets: a study in ordnance gelatin. J Forensic Sci 33:676–696

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sellier K, Kneubuehl BP (1994a) Wound ballistics and the scientific background. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York, pp 131–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellier K, Kneubuehl BP (1994b) Wound ballistics and the scientific background. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York, p 313

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiefel D (1980) Die Wirkung von Vollmantelgeschossen gegen Weichteile (letter). Deutsche Waffen Journal, p 750

  • Torre J (1994) Target arrays and distributions, CRISAT: Technology Area 1 — “Target Definition”. Proceedings, European Small Arms Symposium, 28–29 June 1994, Shrivenham, UK

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knudsen, P.J.T., Vigsnæs, J.S., Rasmussen, R. et al. Terminal ballistics of 7.62 mm NATO bullets: experiments in ordnance gelatin. Int J Leg Med 108, 62–67 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01369906

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01369906

Key words

Navigation