Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the social psychological health states of ambulatory chronically ill patients: Hyper tension and diabetes as tracer conditions

  • Research Reports
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measures of social psychological health states were developed and tested for dimensionality, internal consistency, and generalizability on samples of ambulatory hypertensive and diabetic patients. Despite the existence of several measures of health status, none had been tested solely on ambulatory chronically ill patients. Therefore, to insure that sensitive, reliable measures were available to measure patients' responses to nursing interventions designed to increase ambulatory chronically ill patients' participation in their care of themselves, these measures were developed. The two scales were found to be reliable, generalizable, and valid, in that they were correlated with existing measures of symptom severity, psychological, and functional health status. The question of whether disease specific measures of health status are preferrable to more general measures is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berg RL (ed): Health status indexes.Chicago Hospital Research and Educational Trust, 1973.

  2. Navarro V (ed): Sociomedical health indicators.International Journal of Health Services 6:393–537, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elinson J et al:Health Goals and Health Indicators: Policy Planning and Evaluation. Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jette AM: Health status indicators: Their utility in chronic disease evaluation research.Journal of Chronic Disease 33:567–579, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen M, Bryant B: The measurement of health—A critical and selective overview.Journal of Epidemiology 4(4):257–264, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bice T: Comments on health indicators: Methodological perspectives.International Journal of Health Services 6(3):509–519, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boruch R, & Gomez H: Sensitivity bias and theory in impact evaluation.Professional Psychology:411–434, 1977.

  8. Mechanic D:Future Issues in Health Care, Social Policy and the Rationing of Medical Services. Collier Mac-Millan Publishers, 1979, pp 146–158.

  9. Mechanic D: Sociocultural and social-psychological factors affecting personal responses to psychological disorder.Journal of Health and Social Behavior 16:393–404.

  10. Hyman M: Social psychological factors affecting disability among ambulatory patients.Journal of Chronic Disease 28:199–216, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Renne KS: Measurement of social health in a general population survey.Social Science Research 3:25–44, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenblatt HN:Measurement of Social Well-Being in a General Population Survey. Berkeley, California, California State Department of Health, Human Population Laboratory, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lerner M: Conceptualization of health and social well-being.Health Services Research 8:6–12, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leighton AH:Foundations for a Theory of Man in Relation to Culture. New York, Basic Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Donald CA et al:Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study (Vol 4) (Social Health R-1987/4-HEW). Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Katz MM, Lyerly SB: Methods for measuring adjustment and social behavior in the community: I: Rationale, description, discriminative validity and scale development.Psychological Reports 13:503–535, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paykel ES, Weissman M, Prusoff BA et al: Dimensions of social adjustment in depressed women.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 152:158–172, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gurland BJ, Yorkston NJ, Stone AR, et al: The structured and scaled interview to assess maladjustment (SSIAM).Archives of General Psychiatry 27:259–267, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dohrenwend BS, Dohrenwend BP, Cook D: Ability and disability in role functioning in psychiatric patient and non-patient groups. In JD Wing, H Hafner (eds),Roots of Evaluation. London, Oxford University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Corter WB, et al: The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure.Medical Care 19:787–805, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parkerson GR, Gelbach SH, Wagner EH, et al: The Duke—UNC health profile: An adult health status instrument for primary care.Medical Care 19:806–828, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brook RH, et al: Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand's health insurance study.Medical Care 17:1–55, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ware JE, Jr: Scale for measuring general health perceptions.Health Services Research 11:396–415, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goldberg D, et al: A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests.British Journal of Psychiatry 29:61–67, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldberg D:The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. London, Oxford University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tennant C: The general health questionnaire: A valid index of psychological impairment in Australian populations.Medical Journal of Australia 2:392–394, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Derogatis L, et al: SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale—a preliminary report.Psychopharmacology Bulletin 9:13–18, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guttman L: Multiple group methods for common-factor analysis: Their basis, computation, and interpretation.Psychometrika 17:209–222, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guttman L: Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis.Psychometrika 19:149–161, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen Frances: Personality, Stress and the Development of Physical Illness in George C Stone et al, (eds).Health Psychology, Jessey-Bass Publishers, Washington, 1979, pp 77–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Given, C.W. Measuring the social psychological health states of ambulatory chronically ill patients: Hyper tension and diabetes as tracer conditions. J Community Health 9, 179–195 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326699

Keywords

Navigation