Skip to main content
Log in

Neutralizing marginally deviant behavior: Bingo players and superstition

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bingo is one of the most popular and most accepted forms of gambling in the United States today. Yet, despite its popularity, many bingo players are not completely comfortable with the moral “rightness” of their actions. This participant observation and interview study spanning a 5 year period shows how bingo players use superstitious strategies, such as feelings, hunches and psi, attitudes, and luck to neutralize their marginally deviant behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abt, V., Smith, J., & Christiansen, E. (1985).The business of risk. Lawrence: Kansas University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callois, R. (1961).Man, play and games. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M.P. & LaFleur, T. (1988, July 15). U.S. and Canadian Gaming at a Glance.Gaming and Wagering Business, (pp. 22–23).

  • Hayano, D. (1978). Strategies for the management of luck and action in an urban poker parlor.Urban Life, 7, 475–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henslin, J. (1967). Craps and magic.American Journal of Sociology, 73, 316–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J.P. & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers.American Sociological Review, 40, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, D. (1979, April 21). Bingo kindles heat in general assembly.The News and Observer. Raleigh, N.C.

  • Kallick, M., Suits, D., Dielman, T., and Hybels, J. (1976). A survey of American gambling attitudes and behavior. In Commission on the Review of National Policy Toward Gambling.Gambling in America: Appendix. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, K.M. (1985).Gambling for God: Charity and self-interest in the bingo parlor. Unpublished Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, K.M. (1987). Normative contingencies: Charity and moderation.Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 8, 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1979).The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive.American Sociological Review, 22, 667–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldman, D. (1974). Chance and skill: A study of roulette.Sociology, 8, 407–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold, R. (1985, December 13). Bingo issue pits Creek Indians against Oklahoma.The New York Times.

  • Rumbolz, M. (1988). Indian gambling. In W.R. Eadington (ed.)Gambling research: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on gambling and risk taking. Bureau of Business and Economic Research: University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts.American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, E. (1984, April 15). High stakes being wagered on Indians' bingo.The Plain Dealer.

  • Sykes, G. & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization.American Sociological Review, 22, 667–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman, M. (1982). Magic: A theoretical reassessment.Current Anthropology, 23, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, K.M. Neutralizing marginally deviant behavior: Bingo players and superstition. J Gambling Stud 6, 43–61 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015748

Keywords

Navigation