Abstract
Feminist scholarship seeks to identify and purge androcentric bias in traditional disciplines, to reshape dominant paradigms so that women's needs, interests, activities, and concerns can be analyzed and understood systematically, and to develop research methodologies that are neither gender-biased nor gender-blind. This essay provides an overview of feminist scholarship in the field of policy studies. In particular, it considers feminist studies of substantive policy domains and of the policy-making process, as well as feminist critiques of research paradigms, methods, and results that have structured policy studies for the past 50 years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitz, Mimi (1988).Regulating the Lives of Women. Boston: South End Press.
Ackelsberg, Martha (1992). ‘Feminist analyses of policy,’Comparative Politics 24: 477–493.
Anthony, Katherine (1915).Feminism in Germany and Scandinavia. New York: Henry Holt.
Bologh, R. W. (1990).Love or Greatness: Max Weber and Masculine Thinking: A Feminist Inquiry. London: Unwin Hyman.
Boneparth, Ellen, ed. (1982a).Women, Power and Policy. New York: Pergamon.
Boneparth, Ellen (1982b). ‘A framework for policy analysis,’ in Ellen Boneparth, ed.,Women, Power and Policy. New York: Pergamon, pp. 1–14.
Boneparth, Ellen and Emily Stoper (1988).Women, Power and Policy: Toward the Year 2000. New York: Pergamon.
Brown, Wendy (1988).Manhood and Politics. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Connell, R. W. (1987).Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Conway, Margaret, David Ahern and Gertrude Steuernagel (1994).Women and Public Policy: A Revolution in Progress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Cornell, Drucilla (1991).Beyond Accommodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction and the Law. New York: Routledge.
Diamond, Irene, ed. (1983).Families, Politics, and Public Policy. New York: Longman.
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia and Rita Mae Kelly, eds. (1995).Gender, Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Durst, Samantha and Ryan Rusek (1993). ‘Different genders, different votes? An examination of voting behavior in the U.S. House of Representatives,’ a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, D.C., September 2–5.
Eisenstein, Hester (1991).Gender Shock: How Australian Feminists Make the System Work and What American Women Can Learn From Them. Boston: Beacon Press.
Evans, Sarah and Nelson, Barbara (1989).Wage Justice: Comparable Worth and the Paradox of Technocratic Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ferguson, Kathy (1984).The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Flammang, Janet (1985). ‘Female officials in the feminist capital: The case of Santa Clara County,’Western Political Quarterly 38: 94–118.
Fraser, Nancy (1989).Unruly Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fraser, Nancy (1991). ‘Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracies,’Social Text 26: 56–80.
Freeman, Jo (1975).Women: A Feminist Perspective. Palo Alto, CA.: Mayfield Publishing Co.
Freeman, Jo (1979).Women: A Feminist Perspective. 2nd ed., Palo Alto, CA.: Mayfield Publishing Co.
Freeman, Jo (1982). ‘Women and Public Policy: An Overview,’ in Ellen Boneparth, ed.,Women, Power and Policy. New York: Pergamon.
Freeman, Jo (1989).Women: A Feminist Perspective. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co, 4th ed.
Frug, Mary Jo (1992).Postmodern Legal Feminism. New York: Routledge.
Gehlen, Frieda L. (1977). ‘Women members of Congress: A distinctive role’ in Marianne Githens and Jewell Prestage, eds.,A Portrait of Marginality. New York: McKay.
Gelb, Joyce and Marian Lief Palley (1982).Women and Public Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gelb, Joyce and Marian Lief Palley (1987).Women and Public Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, rev. ed.
Grant, Judith (1993).Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge.
Guy, Mary Ellen, ed. (1992).Men and Women of the States. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Haraway, Donna (1991). ‘Gender for a Marxist dictionary: The sexual politics of a word,’ in herSymians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routldege.
Harding, Sandra (1986).The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Harding, Sandra (1991).Whose Science, Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Harding, Sandra (1992). ‘After the neutrality ideal: Science, politics, and strong objectivity,’Social Research 59 (3): 567–587.
Hawkesworth, M. E. (1985). ‘Workfare and the imposition of discipline,’Social Theory and Practice 11 (2): 163–181.
Hawkesworth, M. E. (1990).Beyond Oppression: Feminist Theory and Political Strategy. New York: Continuum.
Hawkesworth, M. E. (1991). ‘From objectivity to objectification: Feminist objections,’Annals of Scholarship 8 (3/4): 451–477.
Hill, David (1982). ‘Women state legislators and party voting on the E.R.A.,’Social Science Quarterly 64: 318–326.
Jaggar, Alison (1983).Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.
Jaggar, Alison and Paula Rothenberg (1993).Feminist Frameworks. New York: McGraw Hill, 3rd ed.
Jones, Kathleen B. and Anna Jonasdottir, eds. (1988).The Political Interests of Gender: Developing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. London: Sage.
Kantor, Rosabeth M. (1977).Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kaplan, Gisela (1992).Contemporary Western European Feminism. New York: New York University Press.
Kathlene, Lyn (1995). ‘Position power versus gender power: Who holds the floor?’ in Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly, eds.,Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kay, Herna Hill (1974).Sex Based Discrimination. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 3rd ed.
Leader, Susan Gilbert (1977). ‘The policy impact of elected women officials,’ in Louis Maisel and Joseph Cooper, eds.,The Impact of the Electoral Process. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications.
Longino, Helen (1990).Science As Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lindgren, J. Ralph and Nadine Taub (1988).Sex Discrimination. St. Paul, MN.: West Publishing Co.
Lovenduski, Joni (1986).Women and European Politics: Contemporary Feminism and Public Policy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine (1979).The Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine (1987).Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine (1993).Only Words. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Minow, Martha (1990).Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion and American Law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Mouffe, Chantal (1992). ‘Feminism, citizenship, and radical democratic politics,’ in Judith Butler and Joan Scott, eds.,Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge, pp. 369–384.
Mumby, Dennis K. and Linda L. Putnam (1992). ‘The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality,’Academy of Management Review 17 (3): 465–486.
Nelson, Barbara (1984). ‘Women's poverty and women's citizenship: Some political consequences of economic marginality,’Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 10 (2): 209–231.
Newman, Meredith Ann (1995). ‘The gendered nature of Lowi's typology: Or who would guess you could find gender here?’ in Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly, eds.,Gender, Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Rhode, Deborah (1989).Justice and Gender. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Rinehart, Sue Tolleson (1992).Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.
Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina (1974).Women and Social Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Sapiro, Virginia (1986). ‘The gender basis of American social policy,’Political Science Quarterly 101 (2): 221–238.
Savage, A. and Witz, M. (1992). ‘The gender of organizations,’ in theirGender and Bureaucracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Schneider, Anne and Helen Ingram (1993). ‘Social constructions of target populations: Implications of politics and policy,’American Political Science Review 87 (2): 332–347.
Scott, Hilda (1984).Women Work their Way to the Bottom: The Feminization of Poverty. Boston: Pandora Press.
Scott, Joan (1986). ‘Gender: A useful category for historical analysis,’American Historical Review 91 (5): 1053–1075.
Stanton, Elizabeth Cady, Susan B. Anthony, and Matilda J. Gage, eds. ([1881] 1969)The History of Women's Suffrage. New York: Arno Press.
Stetson, Dorothy McBride (1991).Women's Rights in the U.S.A.: Policy Debates and Gender Roles. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Stiehm, Judith Hicks (1994). ‘Different is not opposite,’ a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association. Albuquerque, NM, March 10–13.
Stivers, Camilla (1993).Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications.
Tamerius, Karin L. (1995). ‘Sex, gender, and leadership in the representation of women,’ in Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly, eds.Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Thomas, Sue (1989). ‘Voting patterns in the California Assembly: The role of gender,’Women and Politics 9: 45–53.
Tronto, Joan (1993). ‘Social welfare policy and the ethic of care,’ a paper presented at the Feminist Ethics and Social Policy Conference, University of Pittsburgh, November 5–7.
Vianello, Mino, Renata Siemienska, Natalia Darmian, Eugen Lupri, Enzo D'Arcangelo and Sergio Bolasco (1990).Gender Inequality: A Comparative Study of Discrimination and Participation. Newberry Park, CA.: Sage Publishing Co.
Walby, Sylvia (1986).Patriarchy at Work. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Weitzman, Lenore (1985).The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York: Free Press.
Winston, Kenneth and Mary Jo Bane (1993).Gender and Public Policy. Boulder: Westview Press.
Young, Iris (1990).Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hawkesworth, M. Policy studies within a feminist frame. Policy Sci 27, 97–118 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999883
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999883