Skip to main content
Log in

Immune defense and eosinophilia in congenitally IgE-deficient SJA/9 mice infected withAngiostrongylus costaricensis

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The roles of IgE in protective immunity and eosinophilia inAngiostrongylus costaricensis infection were examined by comparing IgE-deficient SJA/9 mice and IgE-producing SJL/J mice. In primary infection, mean total IgE levels increased to a maximum of 390 ng/ml, which was more than 10 times greater than the 29 ng/ml measured preinfection in SJL/J mice but less than the 10 ng/ml found in SJA/9 mice throughout the experiment. Immune defense as determined by recovery of adult worms and eosinophilia were similar in SJL/J and SJA/9 mice. Protective immunity was induced by infection withA. costaricensis followed by treatment with levamisole for 4–6 days postinfection. After the challenge infection, the numbers of adult worms and eosinophils in SJA/9 mice were not significantly different from those in SJL/J mice. Anti-A. costaricensis IgE antibody was not detected in either strain of mice during the experiment. These results indicate thatA. costaricensis infection induced the production of IgE not specific for parasite antigens in IgE-producing mice. Potentiated nonspecific IgE played no significant role in immune defense and eosinophilia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Capron A, Dessaint JP (1985) Effector and regulatory mechanisms in immunity to schistosomes: a heuristic view. Annu Rev Immunol 3:455–476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman RL, Seymour BWJ, Hudak S, Jackson J, Rennick D (1989) Antibody to interleukin-5 inhibits helminth-induced eosinophilia in mice. Science 245:308–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dessein AJ, Parker WL, James SL, David JR (1981) IgE antibody and resistance to infection; I. Selective suppression of the IgE antibody response in rats diminishes the resistance and the eosinophil response toTrichinella spiralis infection. J Exp Med 153:423–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano T, Miyajima H, Kitagawa H, Watanabe N, Azuma M, Taniguchi O, Hashimoto S, Hirose S, Yagita H, Furusawa S, Ovary Z, Okumura K (1988) Studies on murine IgE with monoclonal antibodies; I. Characterization of rat monoclonal anti-IgE antibodies and use of these antibodies for determinations of serum IgE levels and for anaphylactic reactions. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 85:47–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida K, Yoshimura K (1990) Differences in responses of rat- and guinea-pig-eosinophils to eosinophil chemotactic factors derived fromAngiostrongylus cantonensis. Parasite Immunol 12:269–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett EEE, Miller HRP (1982) Production and activities of IgE in helminth infection. Prog Allergy 31:178–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko S (1988) Induction of protective immunity in mice against heterologous and homologous challenge infection ofAngiostrongylus costaricensis andA. siamensis by larval infection and by adult worm transplantation. Jpn J Vet Res 36:158

    Google Scholar 

  • Key AB, Austen KF (1971) The IgE-mediated release of an eosinophil leukocyte chemotactic factor from human lung. J Immunol 107:899–902

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kigoni EP, Elsas PPX, Lenzi HL, Dessein AJ (1986) IgE antibody and resistance to infection: II. Effect of IgE suppression on the early and late skin reaction and resistance of rats toSchistosoma mansoni infection. Eur J Immunol 16:589–595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai Y, Hirano T, Watanabe N, Okumura K, Ovary Z (1983) Studies on IgE production in mice: I. Spontaneous suppression of IgE production in SJA/9 mice. Immunogenetics 18:147–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loria-Cortes R, Lobo-Sanahuja JF (1980) Clinical abdominal angiostrongylosis. A study of 116 children with intestinal eosinophilic granuloma caused byAngiostrongylus costaricensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 29:538–544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez O, Lastre M, Capron M, Neyrinck JL, Jouault T, Bazin H, Capron A (1989) Total and specific IgE in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of rats and guinea pigs infected withAngiostrongylus cantonensis. Parasitol Res 75:476–481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe N, Ovary Z (1977) Antigen and antibody detection by in vivo methods: a reevaluation of passive cutaneous anaphylactic reactions. J Immunol Methods 14:381–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe N, Kobayashi A, Miyajima H, Hirano T, Ovary Z (1987) Detection of IgE antibody-forming cells by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis using extract from lymphoid organs. J Immunol Methods 96:41–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe N, Katakura K, Kobayashi A, Okumura K, Ovary Z (1988) Protective immunity and eosinophilia in IgE-deficient SJA/9 mice infected withNippostrongylus brasiliensis andTrichinella spiralis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4460–4462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura K, Aiba H, Oya H, Fukuda Y (1980)Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Development following pulmonary arterial transfer into permissive and nonpermissive hosts. Exp Parasitol 49:339–352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research (03454179) from The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. The experiments were done under the regulation of the Guideline for Animal Experiments, The Jikei University School of Medicine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, N., Ishiwata, K., Kaneko, S. et al. Immune defense and eosinophilia in congenitally IgE-deficient SJA/9 mice infected withAngiostrongylus costaricensis . Parasitol Res 79, 431–434 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931835

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931835

Keywords

Navigation