Abstract
This pilot study was designed to evaluate the usefulness of the Functional Limitations Profile (FLP), a validated interval measure of self-report of disability, in studies of multiple sclerosis (MS). It is compared with the standard measure of disability in MS, the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and the Illness Severity Score (ISS), which is an interval score derived from the EDSS. Inherent problems of all measures are discussed. On two occasions separated by 6 months, 50 MS patients were assessed prospectively by a neurologist and a psychologist, using the above measures. Validity was reflected in correlation and in agreement between measures. The FLP Physical dimension correlated significantly with the EDSS for both visits (at visit 1:r = 0.77; at visit 2:r = 0.77). Agreement between the interval measures, FLP and ISS, was satisfactory (mean difference +0.18, SD 6.8). The reliability of FLP was assessed by comparing FLP Physical dimension scores in the 30 patients who had not changed clinically between visits (EDSS change < 1.0, ISS change < 3.8). For this unchanged group the mean difference was +0.56 (SD 6.2); the 95% confidence interval (CI) was −2.87 to +1.75. For sensitivity of the FLP the 20 MS patients who had clinically changed between visits were assessed (EDSS =/> 1.0, ISS =/> 3.8). For this changed group the mean difference was −8.0 (SD 9.21); 95% CI was −12.3 to −3.69. The FLP Physical dimension in this pilot study seems to be a valid, reliable and sensitive measure of MS disability. If confirmed by larger studies it would be useful in prospective clinical studies of treatments for MS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amato MP, Fratiglioni L, Groppi C, Siracusa G, Amaducci L (1988) Interrater reliability in assessing Functional Systems and disability on the Kurtzke scale in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 45:746–748
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gibson BS (1981) The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:789–805
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two measures of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310
Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary PD, et al (1991) Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients. Ann Intern Med 114:451–454
Charlton JRH (1989) Measuring disability in a longtitudinal survey. In: Patrick DL, Peach H (eds) Disablement in the community. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 62–80
Editorial (1991) Recognising disability. Lancet 338:154–155
Francis DA, Bain P, Swan AV, Hughes RAC (1991) An assessment of disability rating scales used in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 48:299–301
Gardner MJ, Gardner SB, Winter PD (1989) Confidence Interval Analysis (CIA). British Medical Journal, London
Goodkin DE, Hertsgaard D, Seminary J (1988) Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine-hole peg tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:850–854
Goodkin DE, Cookfair D, Wende K, et al (1992) Inter- and intrarater scoring agreement using grades 1.0 to 3.5 of the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 42:859–863
Kurtzke JF (1955) A new scale for evaluating disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 5:580–583
Kurtzke JF (1961) On the evaluation of disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 11:686–694
Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452
Kurtzke JF (1989) The Disability Status Scale for multiple sclerosis: apologia pro DSS sua. Neurology 39:291–301
Mickey MR, Ellison GW, Myers LW (1984) An illness severity score for multiple sclerosis. Neurology 34:1343–1347
Noseworthy JH, Vandervoort MK, Wong CJ, Ebers GC (1990) Interrater variability with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Functional Systems (FS) in a multiple sclerosis clinical trial. Neurology 40:971–975
Patrick DL, Peach H (1989) Disablement in the community. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13:277–231
Rao SM, Leo GJ, Ellington L, et al (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology 41:692–696
Spiegel JS, Hirshfield MS, Spiegel TM (1985) Evaluating self-care activities: comparison of a self-reported questionnaire with an occupational therapist interview. Br J Rheumatol 24:357–361
The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) Interferon beta-lb is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. 1. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 43:655–661
Wade DT (1992) Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GPA, et al (1989) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 1. Clinical course and disability. Brain 112:133–146
Weinshenker BG, Rice GPA, Noseworthy JH, Carriere W, Baskerville J, Ebers GC (1991) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 4. Applications to planning and interpretation of clinical therapeutic trials. Brain 114:1057–1067
Willoughby EW, Paty DW (1988) Scales for rating impairment in multiple sclerosis: a critique. Neurology 38:1793–1798
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Judith Hutchinson died on the 4 March 1995
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hutchinson, J., Hutchinson, M. The functional limitations profile may be a valid, reliable and sensitive measure of disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 242, 650–657 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866915
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866915