Summary
-
1.
Middle ear muscle (MEM) activity in awakeChilonycteris p. parnelli was investigated by observing attenuations in cochlear microphonic potentials.
-
2.
The contracted MEMs were found to act as high pass filters that only attenuated the energy in frequencies below 57 kHz. The degree of attenuation was typically equivalent to sound pressure reductions of 20–25 dB.
-
3.
These results show that the MEMs do not attenuate the very loud 60 kHz constant frequency component of the emitted pulse. This, together with data indicative of a sharply tuned auditory system, suggest thatChilonycteris can favorably recieve the 60 kHz constant frequency component of Doppler shifted echoes even during periods of pulse-echo overlap when the MEMs are strongly contracted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Carmel, P. W., Starr, A.: Acoustic and nonacoustic factors modifying middle-ear muscle activity in waking cats. J. Neurophysiol.26, 598–616 (1963).
Desmedt, J. E., Monaco, P.: Mode of action of efferent olivo-cochlear bundle on the inner ear. Nature (Lond.)192, 1263–1265 (1961).
Fex, J.: Auditory activity in centrifugal and centripetal cochlear fibers in the cat: A study of a feedback system. Acta physiol. scand.55 (Suppl. 189) 1–68 (1962).
Galambos, R., Rupert, A.: Action of the middle ear muscles in normal cats. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.31, 349–355 (1959).
Grinnell, A. D.: Comparative auditory neurophysiology of neotropical bats employing different echolocation signals. Z. vergl. Physiol.68, 117–153 (1970).
Henson, O. W., Jr.: Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of Anatomy, Yale University 1965.
Henson, O. W., Jr.: The activity and function of the middle ear muscles in echolocating bats. J. Physiol. (Lond.)180, 871–887 (1965).
Henson, O. W., Jr.: The ear and audition. In: Biology of bats, (vol. II), ed. W. A. Wimsatt, p. 181–264. New York: Academic Press 1970.
Henson, O. W., Jr., Henson, M. M.: Middle ear muscle contractions and their relation to pulse and echo-evoked potentials in the bat,Chilonycteris parnellii. In: Animal orientation and navigation, eds. S. R. Galleret al., p. 355–363 Washington, D. C.: U.S. Govt. Printing Office (NASA special publication No 262) 1972.
Henson, O. W., Jr., Pollak, G.: A technique for chronic implantation of electrodes in the cochleae of bats. Physiol. Behav.8, 1185–1188 (1972).
Kuhl, W. C., Schödder, G. R., Schröder, F. K.: Condenser transmitters and microphones with solid dielectrics for airbone ultrasonics. Acoustica4, 519–532 (1954).
Novick, A.: Orientation in paleotropical bats. I. Michochiroptera. J. exp. Zool.138, 81–154 (1958).
Novick, A.: Orientation in neotropical bats. II. Phyllostomatidae and Desmodontidae. J. Mammal.44, 44–56 (1963).
Novick, A.: Echolocation in bats: some aspects of pulse design. Amer. Sci.59, 198–209 (1971).
Novick, A., Vaisnys, R.: Echolocation of flying insects by the bat,Chilonycteris parnellii. Biol. Bull.128, 297–314 (1964).
Pollak, G., Henson, O. W., Jr., Novick, A.: Cochlear microphonic audiograms in the “pure tone” batChilonycteris parnellii parnellii. Science176, 66–68 (1972a).
Pollak, G., Henson, O. W., Jr., Novick, A.: Cochlear potentials from flying bats. Physiologist15, 239 (1972b).
Schnitzler, H. U.: Die Ultraschall-Ortungslante der Hufeisen-Fledermaus (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen. Z. vergl. Physiol.57, 376–408 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Since the preparation of this report it has been shown thatChilonycteris p. parnellii belongs to the family Mormoopidae and not with the family Phylostomatidae as previously classified. The genusChilonycteris has been eliminated and replaced by the genusPteronotus. Thus,Chilonycteris p. parnellii is now known asPteronotus p. parnellii (Gray) [Smith, J. D., Systematics of the chiropteran family Mormoopidae, Mus. Nat. Hist., Univ. Kansas, Misc. Publ.56 (1972)].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollak, G., Henson, O.W. Specialized functional aspects of the middle ear muscles in the bat,Chilonycteris parnellii . J. Comp. Physiol. 84, 167–174 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00697604
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00697604