Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computed tomography in traumatology with special regard to the advances of three-dimensional display

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

There is a variety of methods to aid in the diagnosis of fractures requiring operative treatment. A computer program that produces pseudo-three-dimensional (3D) images from sets of axial computed tomograms is used for examining fractures in areas of complex skeletal anatomy. The resulting reconstructions, representing the surface in a form similar to that of anatomic preparations, can facilitate the process of diagnosis. They are also valuable for planning operations. The 3D information can be used to define the size, shape, and location of the various fracture types. We have used the technique in more than 500 patients with injuries to the skull, spine, acetabulum, sternoclavicular joint, shoulder, knee, and calcaneus and are able to demonstrate the benefit of special investigation protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Billet FPJ, Schmitt WGH, Gay B, Lang J (1990) Conventional computed tomography and 3D of the normal and fractured os calcis. In: Fuchs WA (ed) Advances in CT. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York pp 154–171

    Google Scholar 

  2. Billet FPJ, Schmitt WGH, Gay B, Hofmann M, Huber M (1990) 3D-Rekonstruktion in der Computertomographie als diagnostischer Gewinn in der Traumatologie? Röntgenpraxis 43:355–364

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burk DL Jr, Mears DC, Kennedy WH, Cooperstein LA, Herbert DL (1985) Three-dimensional computed tomography of acetabular fractures. Radiology 155:183–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carduck H-P, Vosshenrich R, Mäurer J, Helwig A, Grabbe E (1990) Dreidimensionale Darstellung von computertomographischen Skelettbefunden — eine kritische Wertung. Röntgen-praxis 43:142–150

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grodd W, Dannenmaier B, Petersen D, Gehrke (1987) Dreidimensionale (3-D) Bildrekonstruktion von Gesichtsschädel und Schädelbasis in der Computertomographie. Radiologe 27:502–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heuchemer Th, Friedich JM (1990) Sonographie des Kniegelenkes. In: Bargon G (ed) Einsatz moderner bildgebender Untersuchungsverfahren in der Diagnostik der großen Gelenke. Conscientia diagnostica-Byk Gulden, Konstanz, pp 74–82

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hill HA, Sachs MD (1940) The grooved defect of the humeral head. Radiology 35:690–700

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirschfelder H, Hirschfelder U, Beyer WF (1989) Die dreidimensionale Oberflächenrekonstruktion knöcherner Strukturen aus computertomographischen Schnittbildern röntgenologisch schwer zugänglicher Regionen. Electromedica 57:148–153

    Google Scholar 

  9. Imhof K (1989) Die dreidimensionale Darstellung von CT-Bildern: Methode und Möglichkeiten. Electromedica 57:154–159

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaulbach C, Heller M, Triebel H-J, Spielmann RP, Richartz-Heller M (1989) Radiologische Diagnostik der Azetabulumfrakturen. Radiologe 29:501–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Langen H-J, Daus H-J, Bohndorf K, Klose K (1989) Konventionelle Röntgenuntersuchung und Computertomographie bei der Diagnostik von Orbitafrakturen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 150:582–587

    Google Scholar 

  12. Menges V (1990) Die Arthrographie des Kniegelenkes. In: Bargon G (ed) Einsatz moderner bildgebender Untersuchungsverfahren in der Diagnostik der großen Gelenke. Conscientia diagnostica-Byk Gulden, Konstanz, pp 83–88

    Google Scholar 

  13. Müller-Färber J, Müller KH (1982) Präoperative Diagnostik bei rezidivierender Schultergelenkluxation. Unfallheilkd 85:369–376

    Google Scholar 

  14. Passariello R, Trecco F, dePaulis F, Masciocchi C, Bonnani G, Zobel B (1985) Meniscal lesions of the knee joint: CT diagnosis. Radiology 157:29–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pate D, Resnick D, Andre M, Sartoris DJ, Kursunoglu S, Bielecki D, Dev P, Vassiliadis A (1986) Three-dimensional imaging of the musculoskeletal system. AJR 147:545–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reiser M, Rupp N, Karpf M, Feuerbach St, Anacker H (1981) Evaluation of the cruciate ligaments by CT. Eur J Radiol 1:9–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmitt R, Schindler G, Gay B, Brendel H, Riemenschneider J (1987) Computertomographische Diagnostik bei Azetabulumfrakturen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 146:628–635

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmitt WGH, Pracher W, Medrea M, Kirikuta IC (1989) Manubrium sterni und seine gelenkige Verbindung mit der Clavicula und der ersten Rippe in Abhängigkeit vom Lebensalter. Röntgenpraxis 42:193–197

    Google Scholar 

  19. Totty WG, Vannier MW (1984) Complex musculoskeletal anatomy: Analysis using three dimensional surface reconstruction. Radiology 150:173–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vannier M, Marsch JL, Warren JO (1984) Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for cramofacial surgical planning and evaluation. Radiology 150:179–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Billet, F.P.J., Schmitt, W.G.H. & Gay, B. Computed tomography in traumatology with special regard to the advances of three-dimensional display. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111, 131–137 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388086

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388086

Keywords

Navigation