Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of isometric force, maximum power and isometric heat rate as a function of sarcomere length in mouse skeletal muscle

  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The isometric force, maximum power and isometric heat rate have been measured at different sarcomere lengths (SL) between 1.40 and 3.63 μm in two types of mouse muscle, soleus and omohyoideus, at 25°C. The SL force relationship is different in the two muscles. At a SL above optimum filament overlap, 2.44 μm in omohyoideus muscles, maximum power declined while isometric force remained high. In soleus muscles this occurred above a SL of 2.33 μm. In parallel experiments, the isometric heat rate declined linearly with increasing SL above 2.33 μm in soleus muscles, while isometric force remained closer to its maximum. At short SL, between 2.33–1.75 μm in soleus and 2.44–2.15 μm in omohyoideus, maximum power remained at or near its maximum value as did heat rate (soleus) while isometric force fell. In both muscles at SL greater than optimum for force development maximum power output (unlike force) is proportional to filament overlap. The variation in heat rate over this SL range can be described as the sum of a constant rate and a rate proportional to filament overlap. These observations are compatible with the idea that maximum power and heat rate are less affected by non-uniformities in SL than is force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott BC, Aubert X (1951) Changes of energy in a muscle during very slow stretches. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 139:104–117

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bagni MA, Cecchi G, Colomo F, Tesi C (1988) Plateau and descending limb of the sarcomere length-tension relation in short length-clamped segments of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol (Lond) 401:581–595

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bressler BH, Clinch NF (1975) Crossbridges as the major source of compliance in contracting skeletal muscle. Nature 256:221–222

    Google Scholar 

  4. Close R (1972) The relations between sarcomere length and characteristics of isometric twitch contractions of frog sartorius muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 220:745–762

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curtin NA, Woledge RC (1981) Effect of muscle length on energy balance in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 316:453

    Google Scholar 

  6. Curtin NA, Phillips SK, Woledge RC (1987) An ergometer for isovelocity movement of small, isolated muscles. J Physiol (Lond) 387:3P

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edman KAP (1979) The velocity of unloaded shortening and it's relation to sarcomere length and isometric force in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol (Lond) 291:143–159

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edman KAP, Reggiani CR (1987) The sarcomere length-tension relation determined in short segments of intact muscle fibre of the frog. J Physiol (Lond) 385:709–732

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elzinga G, Peckham M, Woledge RC (1984) The sarcomere length dependence of the rate of heat production during isometric tetanic contraction of frog muscles. J Physiol (Lond) 357:495–504

    Google Scholar 

  10. Granzier HLM, Pollack GH (1990) The descending limb of the force-sarcomere length relation of the frog revisited. J Physiol (Lond) 421:595–615

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hill AV (1953) The mechanics of active muscle. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 141:104–117

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hill AV (1965) “Trails and trials in physiology”. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Homsher E, Kean CJ (1978) Skeletal muscle energetics and metabolism. Annu Rev Physiol 40:93–131

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huxley AF (1957) Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys 7:233–318

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huxley AF (1980) “Reflections on Muscle” The Sherrington Lecture XIV. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huxley AF, Peachey LD (1961) The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate striated muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 156:150–165

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jewell BR, Kretzschmar KM, Woledge RC (1967) Length and tension transducers. J Physiol (Lond) 191:10–12P

    Google Scholar 

  18. Julian FJ, Morgan DL (1981) Tension, stiffness, unloaded shortening and potentiation of frog muscle fibres at lengths below optimum. J Physiol (Lond) 319:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  19. McCarter R, Radicke D, Yu BP (1977) A model preparation for studying fast mammalian skeletal muscles. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 156:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pollack G (1990) Muscles and molecules: uncovering the principles of biological motion. Ebner, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rack PMH, Westbury DR (1969) The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 204:443–460

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rall JA (1982) Energetics of Ca2+ cycling during skeletal muscle contraction. Fed Proc 41:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rome LC, Morgan DL, Julian FJ (1985) Stimulation rate, potentiators, and sarcomere length-tension relationship of muscle. Am J Physiol C497–502

  24. Simmons R (1991) Moving story. Nature 351:452

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor SR (1974) Decreased activation in skeletal muscle fibres at short muscle length. Ciba Found Symp 24:93–115

    Google Scholar 

  26. Traeger L, Goldstein MA (1983) Thin filaments are not of uniform length in rat skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 96:100–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, S.K., Woledge, R.C. A comparison of isometric force, maximum power and isometric heat rate as a function of sarcomere length in mouse skeletal muscle. Pflugers Arch. 420, 578–583 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374636

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374636

Key words

Navigation