Abstract
The growing demand for long-term care (LTC) causes the relationship between children and their parents to gain increased importance for society. Parents may create incentives for children to provide LTC through bequests, or they may purchase LTC insurance. While these instruments have been analyzed separately in the literature, this article shows that optimal LTC insurance must be small in the presence of bequests. Thus, the failure of private LTC insurance to diffuse into middle-class households may be explained by the fact that the bequest instrument is fully available to the current generation of parents, who for the first time since 1914 are in a position to bequeath an intact stock of capital in major industrialized countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, Gary S. (1965). “A Theory of the Allocation of Time,” Economic Journal 75, 493–517.
Becker, Gary S. (1974). “Theory of Social Interactions,” Journal of Political Economy 82, 1063–1093.
Bernheim, B. Douglas, Andrei Shleifer, and Lawrence H. Summers. (1985). “The Strategic Bequest Motive,” Journal of Political Economy 93, 1045–1076.
Cutler, David M. (1993). “Why Doesn't the Market Fully Insure Long-Term Care?” NBER Working Paper No. 4301.
Friedman, Benjamin M., and Mark J. Warshawsky. (1990). “The Cost of Annuities: Implications for Saving Behavior and Bequests,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 135–154.
OECD. (1988). Ageing Populations. The Social Policy Implications. Paris: OECD.
Pauly, Mark V. (1990). “The Rational Nonpurchase of Long-Term-Care Insurance,” Journal of Political Economy 98, 153–168.
Richter, Wolfram F. (1993). “Bequeathing Like a Principal,” Discussion Papers in Economics No. 93-01, University of Dortmund.
Scanlon, William J. (1992). “Possible Reforms for Financing Long-Term Care,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 43–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zweifel, P., Strüwe, W. Long-term care insurance and bequests as instruments for shaping intergenerational relationships. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12, 65–76 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353331
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353331