Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methods and problems in measuring quality of life

  • Special Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The US health-care transition demands increased accountability for medical care. This has contributed to increased interest in documenting valued medical outcomes including improvements in health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction. These data can only be obtained validly by asking patients directly about their current health state, perception of well-being, and satisfaction with care. A core set of well-validated instruments have been developed to measure health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. As these are employed with increasing frequency, rigorous quality assurance of data collection is critical. Because of the necessity of quality control, patient-reported data collection can be labor-intensive and prohibitively costly. However, time and cost-saving methods, such as centralized telephone survey methods or on-site direct data entry via interactive computer, can guarantee high-quality data while minimizing costs. Justification of the need for these methods and a brief description are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaronson NK, Beckman J (1987) The quality of life of cancer patients. (Monograph Series of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), vol 17) Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bullinger M, et al (1991) The EORTC Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: interim results of an international field study. In: Osoba D (ed) Effect of cancer on quality of life. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 185–203

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson JP, Kaplan RM, Berry CC, et al (1989) Interrater reliability of function assessment for a health status measure: the quality of well-being scale. Med Care 27:1076–1084

    Google Scholar 

  5. Apgar V (1953) Proposal for new methods of evaluation of newborn infants. Anesth Analg 32:260

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baum M, Priestman T, West RR, Jones EM (1980) A comparison of subjective responses in a trial comparing endocrine with cytotoxic treatment in advanced carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Cancer 16 [Suppl 1]:223–226

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barofsky I, Sugarbaker PH (1990) Cancer. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. Raven Press, New York, pp 419–439

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bergner J, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS (1981) The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:787–806

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boyd NF, Selby PJ, Sutherland HJ, Hogg S (1988) Measurement of the clinical status of patients with breast cancer: evidence for the validity of self assessment with linear analogue scales. J Clin Epidemiol 41:243–250

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Heasman KZ, et al (1990) Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making 10:58–67

    Google Scholar 

  11. Calman KC (1984) The quality of life in cancer patients — an hypothesis. J Med Ethics 10:124–125

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group (1990) Association between recombinant human erythropoietin and quality of life and exercise capacity of patients receiving hemodialysis. Br Med J 300:573–578

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cella DF, Cherin EA (1988) Quality of life during and after cancer treatment. Comprehensive Therapy 14:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cella DF, Tulsky DS (1990) Measuring quality of life today: methodological aspects. Oncology 4:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cella DF, Lee-Riordan D, et al (1989) Quality of life in advanced cancer: three new disease-specific measures. Proc ASCO 8:315

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale: development and validation of the general version. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coates A, Gebski V, Stat M, for the Australian-New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group (1987) Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 317:1490

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cox DR, Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher AE, et al (1992) Quality of life assessments: can we keep it simple? J R Statist Soc 155:353–393

    Google Scholar 

  19. DeHaes JCJM, Knippenberg FCE van, Neijt JP (1990) Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Br J Cancer 62:1034–1038

    Google Scholar 

  20. Donovan K, Sanson-Fisher RW, Redman S (1989) Measuring quality of life in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 7:959–968

    Google Scholar 

  21. Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1987) Methods for economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fayers PM, Jones DR (1983) Measuring and analysing quality of life in cancer clinical trials: a review. Statist Med 2:429–446

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feeny D, LaBelle R, Torrance GW (1990) Integrating economic evaluations and assessments. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life assessment in clinical trials. Raven Press, New York, pp 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrans CE (1990) Development of a quality of life index for patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 17 [Suppl]: 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fetting JH (1988) Evaluating quality and quantity of life in breast cancer adjuvant trials. J Clin Oncol 6:1795–1797

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ganz PA, Schag CAC, Lee JJ, Sim MS (1992) The CARES: a genetic measure of health-related quality of life for patients with cancer. Quality Life Res 1:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Cavalli F (1991) Quality-of-life adjusted evaluation of adjuvant therapies for operable breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 114:621–628

    Google Scholar 

  28. George L, Bearon L (1980) Quality of life in older persons: meaning and measurement. Human Sciences Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gotay CC, Korn EL, McCabe MS, et al (1992) Quality-of-life assesent in cancer treatment protocols: research issues in protocol development. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:575–579

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM (1993) The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ 2:217–227

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hays RD, Stewart AL (1990) The structure of self-reported health in chronic disease patients. Psychol Assess J Consult Clin Psychol 2:22–30

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jacobson NS, Truax P (1991) Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 59:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important differences. Control Clin Trials 10:407–415

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC (1976) Health status: types of validity and the Index of Well-Being. Health Serv Res 11:478–507

    Google Scholar 

  35. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Sutherland HJ, Tritchler DL, et al (1991) Benign and malignant breast disease: the relationship between women's health status and health values. Med Decis Making 11:180–188

    Google Scholar 

  36. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Rogers W, et al (1992) The validity and relative precision of MOS short-and long-form health status scales and Dart-mouth COOP charts: results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 30:MS253-MS265

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moinpour CM, Feigl P, Metch B, et al (1989) Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: review and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:485–495

    Google Scholar 

  38. Osoba D (ed) (1991) Effect of cancer on quality of life. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla

    Google Scholar 

  39. Padilla GV, Grant MM (1985) Quality of life as a cancer nursing outcome variable. Am Nurs Sci 8:45–60

    Google Scholar 

  40. Padilla GV, Presant C, Grant MM, et al (1983) Quality of life index for patients with cancer. Res Nurs Health 6:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  41. Priestman TJ, Baum M (1976) Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer. Lancet I:899–901

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sadura A, Pater J, Osoba D, et al (1992) Quality of life assessment: patient compliance with questionnaire completion. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1023–1026

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schag CAC, Ganz P, Heinrich RL (1991) Cancer rehabilitation evaluation system-short form: a cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument. Cancer 68:1406–1413

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schipper H, Levitt M (1985) Measuring quality of life: risks and benefits. Cancer Treat Rep 69:1115–1123

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M (1984) Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation. J Clin Oncol 2:472–483

    Google Scholar 

  46. Selby PJ, Chapman JAW, Etazadi-Amoli J, et al (1984) The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. Br J Cancer 50:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  47. Skeel RT (1989) Quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials-it's time to catch up. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:472–473

    Google Scholar 

  48. Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, et al (1988) Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 57:109

    Google Scholar 

  49. Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, et al (1981) Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-Index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis 34:585–597

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tannock IF (1991) Management of breast and prostate cancer: how does quality of life enter the equation? In: Tchekmedyian NS, Cella DF (eds) Quality of life in oncology practice and research. Dominus, Williston Park, NY, pp 81–88

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tannock IF, Boyd NF, DeBoer G, et al (1988) A randomized trial of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 6:1377

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tchekmedyian NS, Cella DF (eds) (1991) Quality of life in current oncology practice and research. Dominus, Williston Park, NY

    Google Scholar 

  53. Till JE, McNeil BJ, Busch RS (1984) Measurement of multiple components of quality of life. Cancer Treat Symp 1:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  54. Till JE, Sutherland HJ, Meslin EM (1992) Is there a role for preference assessments in research on quality of life in oncology. Qual Life Res 1:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  55. Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilites for economic appraisal: a review article. J Health Econ 5:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tsevat J, Goldman L, Soukup JR, Lee TH, (1990) Stability of utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction. Med Decis Making 10:323

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tsevat J, Cook EF, Soukop JR, et al (1991) Utilities of the seriously ill (abstract). Clin Res 39:589A

  58. US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health (1990) Quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials: report of the Workshop on Quality of Life Research in Cancer Clinical Trials. Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ware J (1991) Measuring functioning, well-being and other generic health concepts. In: Osoba D (ed) Effect of cancer on quality of life. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 7–23

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI (1991) The Spitzer Quality-of-Life Index: it performance as a measure. In: Osoba D (ed) Effect of cancer on quality of life. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 169–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Rush Medical Center, 1653 West Congress Parkway, 60612-3833, Chicago, IL, USA

    David F. Cella

Authors
  1. David F. Cella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cella, D.F. Methods and problems in measuring quality of life. Support Care Cancer 3, 11–22 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343916

Key words

Search

Navigation