Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: Which technique discriminates fracture risk

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is considerable interest in predicting risk of hip fracture in order to allow targeting of preventive care. This study aimed to determine which of two methods best discriminates a hip fracture population from controls. Fifty women with fractured neck of femur, and 50 control subjects were scanned using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine and hip and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the os calcis. Significant differences between the two populations could be found for both DXA and BUA, with BUA showing the largest percentage difference (27%). The mean z-scores showed that BUA had the lowest, with the exception of DXA trochanter. However, no significant difference between BUA and DXA trochanter Z-scores was found. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that BUA has a superior sensitivity and specificity compared with DXA measurements, with DXA of the hip being better than the spine. This retrospective study shows that BUA is a better discriminator of hip fracture than DXA lumbar spine of DXA hip, which may have important implications for predicting those at risk of future hip fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dixon St JA (1992) Health of the nation and osteoporosis. Ann Rheum Dis 51:914–918

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grimley Evans J, Prudham D, Wandless I (1979) A prospective study of fractures of the proximal femur: incidence and outcome. Publ Hlth Lond 93:235–241

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller CW (1978) Survival and ambulation following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:930–934

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swanson AJG, Murdoch G (1983) Fractured neck of femur: pattern of incidence and implications. Acta Orthop Scand 54:348–355

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyce WJ, Vessey MP (1985) Rising incidence of fracture of the proximal femur. Lancet i:150–151

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spector TD, Cooper C, Fenton Lewis A (1990) Trends in admissions for hip fracture in England and Wales, 1968–85, BMJ 300:173–174

    Google Scholar 

  7. Law MR, Wald NJ, Meade TW (1991) Strategies for prevention of osteoporosis and hip fracture. BMJ 303:453–459

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiel DP, Felson DT, Anderson FF, Wilson PWF, Moskowitz MA (1987) Hip fracture and the use of oestrogens in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 317:1169–1174

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Gullberg B et al. (1992) Evidence for efficacy of drugs affecting bone metabolism in preventing hip fractures. BMJ 305:1124–1128

    Google Scholar 

  10. Recker RR (1989) Low bone mass may not be the only cause of skeletal fragility in osteoporosis. Proc Soc Exp Med 273–274

  11. Parfitt AM (1987) Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. Am J Med 82(suppl 1B):68–72

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper C, Barker DJP, Morris J, Briggs RSJ (1987) Osteoporosis, falls and age in fracture of the proximal femur. BMJ 295:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans JA, Tavakoli MB (1990) Ultrasonic attenuation and velocity in bone. Phys Med Biol 35:1387–1396

    Google Scholar 

  14. Langton CM, Evans GP, Hodgkinson R, Riggs CM (1990) Ultrasonic, elastic and structural properties of cancellous bone. In: Ring EFG (ed) Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement. British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porter RW, Miller C, Grainger S (1990) Prediction of hip fractures in elderly women: a prospective study. BMJ 301:638–641

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  17. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Sem Nucl Med 8(4):283–298

    Google Scholar 

  18. Truscott JG, Simpson M, Stewart SP, et al. (1992) Bone ultrasonic attenuation in women: reproducibility, normal variation and comparison with photon absorptiometry. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 13(1):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  19. Herd RJM, Ramalingham T, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I, Blake GM (1992) Measurements of broadband ultrasound attenuation in the calcaneus in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 2:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  20. Poll V, Cooper C, Cawley MID (1986) Broadband ultrasonic attenuation in the os calcis and single photon absorptiometry in the distal forearm: a comparative study. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 7(4):375–379

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schott AM, Hans D, Sornay-Rendu E, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ (1993) Ultrasound measurements on os calcis: precision and age-related changes in a normal female population. Osteoporosis Int 3:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chevalley T, Rizzoli R, Nydegger V et al. (1991) Preferential low bone density of femoral neck in patients with a recent fracture of the proximal femur. Osteoporosis Int 1:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aloia JF, McGowan D, Erens E, Miele G (1992) Hip fracture patients have generalized osteopenia with a preferential deficit in the femur. Osteoporosis Int 2:88–93

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vega E, Mautalen C, Gomez H, Garrido A, Melo L, Sahores AO (1991) Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Osteoporosis Int 1:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  25. Duboeuf F, Braillon P, Chapuy MC, et al. (1991) Bone mineral density of the hip measured with DXA in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int 1:242–249

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baran DT, Kelly AM, Karellas A, et al. (1988) Ultrasound attenuation of the os calcis in women with osteoporosis and hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 43:138–142

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agren M, Karellas A, Leahey D, Marks S, Baran D (1989) Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus: a sensitive and specific discriminator of osteopenia in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 44:228–232

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meltzer M, Lessig HJ, Siegel JA (1989) Bone mineral density and fracture in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 45:142–145

    Google Scholar 

  29. Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Mann T (1990) The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1202–1207

  30. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. (1990) Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA 263:865–868

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wasnich RD, Ross PD, Heilburn LK, Vogel JM (1987) Selection of the optimal skeletal site for fracture risk prediction. Clin Orthop Rel Res 216:262–269

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnick RD (1991) Preexisting fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Int Med 114:919–923

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, A., Reid, D.M. & Porter, R.W. Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: Which technique discriminates fracture risk. Calcif Tissue Int 54, 466–469 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334324

Key words

Navigation